Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, I agree with what you are saying, I only mentioned the governing body code of practice as a nod to the fact that I wasn't dismissing the BPA or whoever out of hand, thought that would go in my favour before a judge. I wrote a long post about the BPA CoP earlier but then deleted it because I realised I wasn't talking about points of law but a set of guidelines drawn up by one bunch of charlatans for another bunch of charlatans. It is ludicrous that the 5 minute consideration period doesn't apply if the motorist parks, such nonsense. As for legislation, I was referring to the government legislation (if it is legislation?) document which has been withdrawn. Does that stand until it has been reintroduced? In the explanatory document it is quite clear. Otherwise, how does one hold them to the consideration and grace periods? Or is that at the discretion of the judge?
    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2162 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HELP!!!!!! Please .......

My 16yr old son went through a bus lane back in November 2017 on his motorcycle, the first we knew about it was when we received an notice of enforcement totalling £175 through the post from Marston’s on 29th March 2018 but the letter was giving us until 25th March to get in touch for a payment arrangement.

 

We rang them and explained that this had been received after the date to come to an arrangement and this is the first time we had known about the fine. They were most unhelpful saying that the full amount needed to be paid to stop further action. I asked for evidence of the offence and they did not have this and suggested I speak to SWindon Bpurough Council.

 

This we did and also they were inhelpful saying this was now passed to marstons who were dealing with it now. We explained that had we received the PCN’s we would have paid the priginal fee of £30. They had no photographic evidence as there files were now closed on this and everything was with marstons. We filed an out of time order with the TEC had no response and now we have a removal notice today for £408.

 

My son is on full time education does not work as he helps me at weekends as I e just been diagnosed with cancer. He has no way of paying this and marstons will not accept an arrangement they only want full payment. I’m happy to pay weekly to stop this action if only they’d listen. My son no longer has the motorcycle as he sold it to use for tools for his college.

 

Can someone please help or advise. I know the usual keep doors and windows locked but I need a solution to the problem.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Moved to the bailiff forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, This was sent on 3rd April and the reply said it takes 10 working days to process, I rang on 17th and was told it was still being processed not to call as when a decision is made we will be informed. We received nothing until the bailiff put the removal notice thru.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, This was sent on 3rd April and the reply said it takes 10 working days to process, I rang on 17th and was told it was still being processed not to call as when a decision is made we will be informed. We received nothing until the bailiff put the removal notice thru.

 

You mention that you had a reply advising that it would take 10 days to process the Out of Time application. Can you tell me who the reply was from as this information isn't correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just need to know how I go about a payment plan with the bailiff who is not prepared to discuss such a thing only full payment. And marstons themselves keep saying they do not do payment plans I have to speak to the bailiff I’m getting nowhere. Surely there’s someone on here that can help me

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are in the driving seat here.

The Bailiff may only take control of goods belonging to the debtor

- I assume your son has not elevated himself to works of art or rolex watches yet.

 

The next plan will be for them to try and force you to pay

- quite a common ploy as a lot of parents will do this.

 

Do not be misled by them saying they can force entry to remove goods

- they cannot in this case

- unless they have been allowed in previously and would strongly suggest you do not allow this.

 

They can however remove goods from outside

- car, quality garden furniture etc but doubt your son has any of this.

 

Get to the stage and the Bailiff is stuffed

- if he wants paying then he must accept what he is offered whether he likes it or not.

 

The alternative is the Warrant is returned to the Client (Council) and all the fees will be wiped meaning he gets zilch.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou, so am I right in saying they cannot legally make me ( the parent) pay as the debt is not in my name, however due to the situation I am offering to pay a regular amount to them so they get there money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was an automated reply

 

You mention that you had a reply advising that it would take 10 days to process the Out of Time application. Can you tell me who the reply was from as this information isn't correct.

 

The automated reply is merely to advise you that it can take 10 working days to process responses from the Local Authority.

 

A little known fact is that when an Out of time witness statement is submitted to TEC, a copy is then sent to the Local authority and they have a period of 19 business days (a month) to decide whether or not to give permission for the witness statement to be submitted late (out of time). They will respond to TEC with their decision. It can take 10 working days for TEC to process their response.

 

if the local authority are not willing to give their permission, the application will be passed to a member of staff at TEC. That person will review the reason given on the Out of Time witness statement against the councils reason for refusing the application. A decision will then be made. You will be sent a letter by the Traffic Enforcement Centre advising of that decision.

 

Using the above example, you will hopefully understand when an Out of Time witness statement is submitted that the case is placed on hold for approx 6 weeks (much shorter with Dart Charge).

 

As I understand it from your above posts, you have NOT as yet received a response from the Traffic Enforcement Centre and in fact, TEC have confirmed to you in a telephone call that they have not finished processing the local authorities response. Therefore, the case should still be on hold and if so, it is somewhat premature for you to be approaching Marston with a payment proposal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Thankyou, so am I right in saying they cannot legally make me ( the parent) pay as the debt is not in my name, however due to the situation I am offering to pay a regular amount to them so they get there money.

 

 

 

 

Technically they shouldn't be talking to you anyway as you are not the debtor. As for your son then there is no law that states he has to talk to a Bailiff. If he knocks on the door you are within your rights to just close it in his face - providing of course you can then ignore the repeated knocking/hammering that will ensue. Put quite simply if you are prepared to pay then tell them you will pay £xxx every week/month take it or leave it. I'll guarantee they won't be happy but that's their problem - if it were me if they refuse then I would lower my proposal each time until eventually they have to take it or leave it.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

if so, it is somewhat premature for you to be approaching Marston with a payment proposal.

 

 

 

 

from Post 1 - We filed an out of time order with the TEC had no response and now we have a removal notice today for £408.

 

 

It appears Marstons have now made a visit suggesting the matter is now "off hold".

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

from Post 1 - We filed an out of time order with the TEC had no response and now we have a removal notice today for £408.

 

It appears Marstons have now made a visit suggesting the matter is now "off hold".

I quite agree that it is an odd situation and more so given the telephone conversation that the OP had with the Traffic Enforcement Centre where they confirmed that they have not as yet processed the local authorities response. Maybe another call to TEC is necessary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably already with sharkstons before TEC contacted originally. Can a bailiff actually enforce against a minor?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OOPs I have a missing post. Just before post 19 I showed a statement taken form the House of commons library which stated quite clearly that debts of those under 18 are unenforceable.

I do not know who you asked about that on your post 7 but if it was the bailiff company they would say anything to avoid losing their money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry tthat was my bad

I tried to sort the linkfor you and iit looks like it didn't attach again.

 

here the link you posted

http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN07032/SN07032.pdf

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rang marstons again yesterday in a last ditch attempt to come to an arrangement and was told it needs to be paid in full and I need to speak to tgd bailiff direct.

I emphasised the fact my son has no assets, lives at home no job but in full time education and the lady told me they would still pursue.

 

Am I right in saying I can go back to marstons then and say that because my son is 17 they cannot enforce the debt and I can quote that this?

 

Is there such a letter I can send to marstons and SBC quoting that this is illegal and they cannot enforce the debt!

I seem to be banging my head against a brick wall at the moment all of the info given is fantastic but they will not agree to anything.

I need something to slap them with!

Thanks all

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just imagine how many unpaid debts there would be from motoring offences etc if enforcement could not take place. No 17 year old in his right mind would pay parking tickets, go up and down one way streets - in other words put two fingers up to the world.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...