Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

JD Parking Consultants Ltd PCN - 35 Hallgate car park Doncaster DN1 3NL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 668 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

DVLA has confirmed that the enquirer was Debt Recovery LTD for JD Parking consultants Ltd.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange that the DVLA are providing data to Debt Recovery who are not members of BPA on behalf of JD parking who are members of BPA.

 

If Paul has got the details the right way round is there a Data Protection query involved? Where do Debt Recovery get the right to ask for our details when they are not a party to any parking infringement that may or may not have occurred.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange that the DVLA are providing data to Debt Recovery who are not members of BPA on behalf of JD parking who are members of BPA.

 

If Paul has got the details the right way round is there a Data Protection query involved? Where do Debt Recovery get the right to ask for our details when they are not a party to any parking infringement that may or may not have occurred.

 

 

Good point.

 

Debt Reovery Plus are members.

 

You may still have a point regarding DRP requesting and obtaining my details though. The DVLA state that information can be released to Landowners or their agents. Debt Recovery Plus are neither the Landowner nor or they the agent of the Landowner. This is dependant though, on the charge being contractual in nature, however, as we know a contract was never performed, so the only entity that has the right to request my data is the Landowner or whoever is/was in possession of the land.

 

Seems that the creditor or the agent of the creditor can request keeper details.

 

The FOPA 2012 does allow the agent of a creditor to request keeper details.

Edited by dx100uk
Merge

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul please post images as a pdf attachment as per upload

Posting images within a post forces people paying for their data to waste it on an image they can choose to download by an attachment

 

It also slows the thread for people on slow internet feeds

 

Thankyou

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if that is true then you can sue the DVLA as NO third party has a right to obtain your keeper details. Report this to the ICO as well as a complaint.

If it was the other way round then the DVLA are still breaking the law for the reason already stated. This is well established so I cant see what the DVLA is playing at.

 

 

 

DVLA has confirmed that the enquirer was Debt Recovery LTD for JD Parking consultants Ltd.
Link to post
Share on other sites

if that is true then you can sue the DVLA as NO third party has a right to obtain your keeper details. Report this to the ICO as well as a complaint.

If it was the other way round then the DVLA are still breaking the law for the reason already stated. This is well established so I cant see what the DVLA is playing at.

 

 

Are you sure on this? If you are correct ill take your advice and submit a complaint to the DVLA and report the matter to the ICO.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received the email below from the DVLA. The response isn't good enough, so Ive requested that they provide, or attest that they have evidence which allows the DVLA to provide Debt Recovery with my personal data. The DVLA are going to contact the relevant department and then respond.

 

 

 

Good Morning,

 

I obtained some further advice on this, just to ensure the information I am giving is correct.

 

The company Debt Recovery Plus is acting as the landowners Agents in this matter, through having either a contract with the landowner themselves or a contract with a third party company acting on behalf of the Landowners (The third party company having authority to employ other companies to act on behalf of the landowner).

 

I trust this will assist you

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

The DVLA's response doesn't state fact, I've made them aware that providing my data to DRP may have breached the DPA.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop emailing people, they wont give a proper response despite the changes of the GDPR from the DPA.

I would respond to the DVLA and ask for "strict proof" that the DVLA saw the supposed contracts before they released your information.

They wont have, they rely on a bunch of liars actually telling the truth about this and we know that it isnt true

Link to post
Share on other sites

l've requested the proof from the DVLA.

Edited by dx100uk
Unnecessary quote of previous post removed -dx

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please stop using reply with quote.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Debt Recovery plus has an agreement to request data from DVLA as a subcontractor of JD Parking solutions then the Mil collection case does not apply. The Mil case was in relation to selling data.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

My last email sent to DR on the 12th June along with todays response below. Now time to concentrate on the data breach side.

 

 

 

Dear Mrs Bartley

 

If the charge is for breach of contract, please provide the terms the driver breached?

 

The signage deters/forbids anyone without a permit and/or failure to display the same to pay a charge.

 

At no time did the driver request a permit or was provided with same, accordingly no contract was entered into.

 

Furthermore, I do not agree that there is an outstanding debt and I believe there was NO reasonable cause to request my personal data from the DVLA.

 

Again, please advise that you have an valid contract with the landowner to request my details for breach of contract. However, as the matter is an Act if trespass you have no rights.

 

I suggest you seek legal advice on the matter before you respond to my grievance.

 

Yours Sincerely

Paul Walton

 

Thank you for your email regarding the above Parking Charge Notice (PCN).

 

After carefully considering the case, I have cancelled the above parking charge on this occasion only. I have also noted our records to ensure that we do not send any further letters about this parking charge.

 

I must stress, however, that the terms and conditions of parking at this site are clear and must be abided by at all times. Therefore, I will not be able to withdraw any further PCNs issued to the vehicle.

 

Kind Regards

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

EMAIL?

have you not bothered to read anything people say about the wisdom of using emeil to communicate with parking co's or their lackeys.

 

I read everything but do things my own way - If you have a problem with it stay off the thread.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Todays email from the DVLA.

 

Good morning,

 

If you do wish to make a official complaint please find enclosed copy of our complaints procedure which details how to make a complaint. This also contains details on how to escalate your complaint higher if you are still unhappy with the response received.

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/driver-and-vehicle-licensing-agency/about/complaints-procedure

 

I am still waiting for a response from the department which deals with these requests and until they reply I will be unable to other than in the manner which I previously responded.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

these threads are read by thousands of people so advice is not just aimed at you but others following it or using it for advice.

you can do what you want but if you really want to plough your own furrow why post and ask for advice in the first place.

 

You seem happy enough to use people's help when it suits you but then get shirty when you dont like being told that some of your actions are unwise.

You cant have it both ways.

 

My next piece of advice is to do exactly what you seen to be doing, exhaust the DVLA complaints procedure and get the information they seem reticent to send you (for obvious reasons) and then complain to the ICO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ericsbrother you need to chill out. The charge has been cancelled. I take advice when I believe it to be in my best interest to do so.

 

Now its time to work on the data breach.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time to have some fun and apply more pressure.

 

 

Thank you for this response.

 

As previous requested. Please provide the evidence of Legal authority which afforded Debt Recovery Ltd rights to obtain my personal data from the DVLA.

 

I have requested same from the DVLA and I await their response.

 

Should it transpire that Debt Recovery Plus Ltd unlawfully obtained/ processed my personal data, then I will seek to recover compensation for distress and/or hurt feelings.

 

Furthermore, I continue to claim that your behaviour may have fallen foul of the Fraud Act 2006 as you attempted to recover £100 for contractual entitlement when there was never entitlement.

 

I await your response.

 

Kind Regards

Paul Walton

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

See if they respond to this.

 

 

Dear Mrs/Ms Bartley

 

You are processing my personal data without obtaining my explicit consent under Article 6 (1) GDPR. You have no lawful basis to process my data. I suggest you read up on Article 83(5)(a) and review your position.

 

Please clarify the condition/ lawful reason you rely on to process my data?

 

Kind Regards

Paul Walton

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...