Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Irresponsible Lending Claim due to 7 PDL company loans over gambling


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2062 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, really hoping for some advice on my story, will try keep it short as much as possible!

 

i am going to be brutally honest i developed a gambling addiction about 6 years ago, what started out as fun soon became addictive.

 

one loan turned into another and then payday loans started which were so easy to get ( i know there is responsibility on my side but if you have never been inside a gamblers mind it doesnt work the same way as a normal person when it comes to finding the next " loan " )

 

i am now taking steps to recover from this as all my family knows

in the meantime i wonder if i can claim for irresponsible lending against the below firms due to the fact i had several defaults on my file,

 

one as recent as 2018 and multiple accounts showing in arrears/defaulted from 5 years ago, multiple search history on my file which shows how desperate i was to get credit all showing at the time they credit checked me when i applied for a loan with them

 

Mr Lender - 18th Feb £200 - with interest £311

Wonga - 28th Feb - £200 - With interest £234

Myjar - 31st March - £100 - With Interest £150

Cash4unow -10th April - £200 - With Interest £295

Loans2go - 13th April - £200 - with Interest £1019 (took out for longer term)

Oakam - 17th April - £150 - With Interest £311

Peachy - 19th April - £100 initially then allowed me to top up with an extra £200 on the same day - With Interest £556

 

i would like to state that Peachy havent done a credit check, spoke to them this morning and they say they do credit checks, i checked my file on noddle for the 19th and there is no footprint from them on that date under Peachy or cash on go ltd (funny enough in my accounts its registered i have an active loan with them)

 

with all the defaults and accounts in arrears and my credit rating being 1 out of 5 (its at the lowest end of available credit score) surely all this should have alarmed them to consider not giving me the loan and it should have showed i couldnt afford to repay anything.

 

how can they call themselves responsible lenders? surely the defaults themselves should have caused them to say " this person cant pay loans back that are over 5 years old "

 

any thoughts how i should progress with this?

 

i have sent email off to them all lodging a complaint not using any templates as i wanted to write it myself as i dont feel a template really fitted the point im trying to get across to them.

Edited by hamilton20010
Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG - hamilton20010

 

DX is right - We have a guide that goes End 2 End - From establishing your claim to referring to the FOS.

Any questions - Please do let us know.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG - hamilton20010

 

DX is right - We have a guide that goes End 2 End - From establishing your claim to referring to the FOS.

Any questions - Please do let us know.

 

Where are the templates letters at please? i bet i have clearly missed them in an obvious place!

Link to post
Share on other sites

letters not email - 1st class

get free proof of posting from the PO counter too if you can

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how do i upload attachments or pictures?

 

got a letter from one of my creditors i need advice on

 

PDF it or use officelens to scan the document

And you can then attach it to your post

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

right attached :)

 

well the creditor is Mr Lender, i filed an irresponsible lending claim because of my gambling addiction and the fact i had several defaults on my file at the time i applied and lots of accounts on file already in arrears.

 

one thing i find interesting is that they have lied about what i put down for " other outgoings " i would never put a random number in like £168 i always round things to the nearest £10 or 100 or whatever so i dont know where they got £168 from, the only thing they asked to verify with me at the time was payslips

 

they say my credit score was 549 at the time of loan, on noddle its 1 out of 5 447 score and thats rated very poor so if it was 549 it still would be poor.

 

They say they responsibly lent and checked my credit file even though its littered with defaults from accounts that have not been paid.

 

im wondering whether to accept this offer or take it further? hold out to see if a month or so down the line they will keep reducing the balance

 

thanks for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

always push further

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

always push further

 

would there be a specific template i should send back?

 

also some of my debts got back over 3 or 4 years where i complained to get the interest and charges back and they declined but i didnt take it further so i dont know if i should complain to them again using templates from this site?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No

 

YES

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive unapproved the attachment for you... Rename it on your PC to something random and reupload it :)

 

That way you dont reveal your name to the world :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

These loans were supposed to take into account defaults... But if they are lending to you when they can see you arent servicing other debts that that is a BIG No-No...

Off to the FOS You go :)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

These loans were supposed to take into account defaults... But if they are lending to you when they can see you arent servicing other debts that that is a BIG No-No...

Off to the FOS You go :)

 

i will :) do i tell them i am going to the FOS or keep it quiet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant do a thing go silent key on them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...