Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moriarty Law threating CCJ


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2162 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I wonder if someone could please help me with this?

 

I had TalkTalk as broadband provider back in 2011. I moved property back in June that year, informing TalkTalk by phone that the landlord agreed to continue with the service and we just wanted a change of name.

 

On the 06/06/11 I was provided via email with a change of name form, which we sent via Royal Mail following the procedure that the retentions advisor suggested and paying for all my account balance, canceling the direct debit.

 

My Landlord, who moved back to the time to the property made calls to India (so I knew it was him) and realized that they never changed the ownership of the account, even when I called them months after the mistake, indicating that the form could have probably been lost in the post.

 

Ever since, I've had a series of collection agencies trying to get the money back, to all of them, I;ve explained the same story over and over again until the last one with Moriarty Law, the ones that are now threating me to take me to court if I dont pay the inflated amount of £208.93. I do understand that these companies just buy the debts in a desperate attempt to get money back.

 

I did explain on the phone that I don't owe anything to TalkTalk and how it was possible for them to keep chasing me as I understand that this should be categorized now as barred?

 

I wonder if there's anything I could do or hit them back? I hate people like this chasing me for something that I've already explained, declaring that if they didnt change the name on the account it was their problem not mine and they are chasing the wrong person for the debt.

 

I think after 7 years I've had enough of clowns chasing me for this and believe now that this is an unlawful practice under the limitations act? Can I now take them to court for harassment opening a case in the small claims court?

 

Thank you beforehand for any help you can provide me with.

 

Kindest Regards,

 

GB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is statute barred so they can threaten whatever...simply file away their threatogrames and dont converse with them.

 

There is a statute barred template letter you may wish to send them in our library...but personally I would just ignore them as this normally creates letter tennis and is counter productive...they are fully aware its statute barred without you having to tell them....and why spend money on a court claim to simply reiterate the obvious..you dont need the stress.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is statute barred so they can threaten whatever...simply file away their threatogrames and dont converse with them.

 

There is a statute barred template letter you may wish to send them in our library...but personally I would just ignore them as this normally creates letter tennis and is counter productive...they are fully aware its statute barred without you having to tell them....and why spend money on a court claim to simply reiterate the obvious..you dont need the stress.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

Thank you for the explanation Andy.

 

Will ignore them now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is statute barred so they can threaten whatever...simply file away their threatogrames and dont converse with them.

 

There is a statute barred template letter you may wish to send them in our library...but personally I would just ignore them as this normally creates letter tennis and is counter productive...they are fully aware its statute barred without you having to tell them....and why spend money on a court claim to simply reiterate the obvious..you dont need the stress.

 

Regards

 

Andy

 

 

Hello Andy,

 

Today I have received a Judgment for Claimant (In Default). The letter is dated 14 May 2018, but only received this morning after opening my post from yesterday.

 

They basically say that I have failed to reply to the claim form, but I didnt have one, maybe because my post is being again redirected to my new place where I moved to less than 2 months ago.

 

They say that I need to pay to the claimant the total sum of £230.93 and that the first payment by installments of £50 needs to reach the claimant by the 13th of June this year.

 

I rang the County Court Business Centre and explained that I never had a claims forms, they asked if I did want to go to court and wanted to defend, then it would be £55 to be paid on my side.

 

Again, the only conversation I had with them was by Nov/Dec last year, informing them that I didnt have to pay that and that I don't owe the money. I can't believe that they started court proceedings for these amount of money.

 

On the notes to the defendant it says that if I pay in full within one month I can ask the court to cancel the entry on the register. This is ridicolous, I am buying a house soon and I need a mortgage.

 

May I please get some help with this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the Notice of Judgment managed to find the correct address but not the claim form....strange :-)

 

Its £255 to make application to set a side using the N244 Application notice..not £55.

 

The debt was statute barred before issuance of the claim ...we assume ..you will have to confirm.

 

Have you asked MCOL for a copy of the claim form ?

 

What do you wish to do .....£255 to set a side or pay or pay £230 in full by the date stated and be shot of it......?

 

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the Notice of Judgment managed to find the correct address but not the claim form....strange :-)

 

Its £255 to make application to set a side using the N244 Application notice..not £55.

 

The debt was statute barred before issuance of the claim ...we assume ..you will have to confirm.

 

Have you asked MCOL for a copy of the claim form ?

 

What do you wish to do .....£255 to set a side or pay or pay £230 in full by the date stated and be shot of it......?

 

 

 

Andy

 

 

The Claims form surely went to the previous address where I redirected my post. In the last 12 months, I left the property where I lived for 4 years and the one where Moriarty Law has been contacting me on. I never informed them of the place where I was living. The letter surely went to the house of a friend of mine where I lived until a couple of months ago. I called Royal Mail to make the change. If the claims form went to the previous address, can I still do something with it and use it as proof if it remains unopened?

 

When I firstly wrote this post, the last letter I received from Moriarty Law (27/04/2018) said, "as you are aware we recently issued proceedings against you" and that they were instructed to enter judgment 14 days of the letter, but does not mention anything about the claim form.

 

The guy confirmed on the telephone that the debt is from 2011. I haven't paid anything to them or admitted that i owe the debt to them or many of the other collection agencies who in the past contacted me for this.

 

I haven't asked MCOL for a copy of the claims form no.

 

Are these my only two options availble? 255£ to set aside and possibly ask the judge to have the money back, based on the basis that I never received the claims for or paying in full a money that I don't owe (£230.93)?

 

Regards,

 

Giancarlo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Issued proceedings is a claim form and enter Judgment is a CCJ...so in reality you should have been aware there was a claim form issued.

 

Opened or unopened the claim was served...the court accepts good service is served to a last known previous address...its your responsibly to either inform any creditor or debt connection of your new address and redirection is simply not reliable IMHO.

 

The debt is Statute barred as you have confirmed above ...so that would be grounds to set a side...the mix up in address is not unfortunately.

 

Looking at it pragmatically the judgment amount is £230.93..the application fee is £255 (unless your on benefits and exempt from fees).

 

If you successfully set a side and the court accepts defence on statute barred basis you can request the fee of making the application back as costs.

 

There is a further option and that is to inform the Judgment claimant that you intend to set a side and claim the fee and costs...and would they be willing by Consent Order for them to set it aside ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ring Moriarty Law inform them you have received Notice of Judgment on a claim form that they served at your previous address with full knowledge of your current address (on the Notice of Judgment)...that the debt was statute barred before they issued the claim.....and its your intention to make application to set it aside and claim fee and costs...on the alternative would they be prepared by consent order to set it aside (they pay for the application) ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

 

On the notice of judgement it also shows my previous address, not the current one.

 

Should I provide Moriarty Law with my current address under any circumnstances to make them aware that they have been sending all the correspondence during this time to a different address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So was the Notice of Judgment redirected or posted direct from Moriarty Law

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So was the Notice of Judgment redirected or posted direct from Moriarty Law

 

It was redirected as well. I have not received the claim form or the notice of judgement directly.

 

All what I did it was changing the redirection to my current address that's why I'm saying that the claims form could have gone to my friend's address as I haven't got anything on me apart from the communications I've just specified.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well sound them out....if they are not interested in a Consent....then go ahead with the application...but they will get your address then.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...