Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks very much Bank. I have topped and tailed my LOC and printed off a copy which I shall post tomorrow by First Class post at my local post office and also obtain a proof of postage. I'll also email them a copy. I've opened a MoneyClaim account, and shall now begin work on my draft Particulars of Claim which I shall post here for your thoughts. And I shan't be using the Moderation service.
    • Yes, it struck me this morning that I'd got it wrong    - no involvement of UKPPO in any previous Tesco thread    - there would have been an entrance sign to a Tesco car park    - CCTV isn't something associated with Tesco car parks. Presumably whoever runs the car park has put CCTV at the electric, and probably BB, areas, done absolutely nothing to stop abuse, and then rubs their hands in glee every time the CCTV catches a motorist out. You can pay £60 and this will go away. Or you can defy UKPPO and rely on their non-respect of POFA, consideration period, etc., should they be daft enough to do court later down the line.  We would support you all the way.
    • thats not the way to do it sorry. sorry so what is your problem? that vanquis paid the £560 or that they are now chasing it? how old is this debt? dx  
    • If you visited Qatar you could be detained at the border, if the debt has been notified.  If you are only in transit and do not seek to cross border into Qatar you might be ok, but you may want to seek formal advice about this.
    • Howdy, I had a short lived credit card with Vanquis that I did not need. I paid it off in full and called them and closed it with the person at the other end. 2 months later they started sending me messages about late payments, I called them and to find out that the card had not been closed in error and 6 weeks after it should have been closed they paid a google debit of £560. I hit the roof and made a formal complaint that took them well over a month to respond to. They agreed they were at fault, refunded all late payments fees and offered me £100 in compensation. However they said the debit amount stood as 'I had benefit from it' and I should get a refund from google. I hit the roof again but they have stuck to their guns. The debit from google is a genuine one but I wanted to dispute it with google so closed the card so they would have to engage with me. But surely that's neither here nor there surely? What is the next step? Ombudsman takes forever doesn't it?  thanks in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

House Insurance renewal has been refused due to a motoring conviction


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My house buildings insurance renewal has been refused due to a motoring conviction.

 

As far as I know houses don't have wheels or engines and aren't subject to the Road

Traffic Act.

 

How on earth can motoring convictions apply to houses?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the conviction related to motor insurance? Or involving any element of dishonesty?

 

What was the offence (or the endorsement code, if any)

IN10 and (LC30 or LC50) : it wouldn’t be too hard to see how they could state your risk profile was too high.

 

When did you pass your test?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I failed a random breath test and was disqualified from driving for 12 months.

I therefore assume I am dishonest.

When I was breath tested I had tax, insurance and MOT.

My endorsement code DR10.

I passed my test in August 1974.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread title amended.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

When was your last house insurance renewal?

Was that prior to your disqualification? After??

I’m just trying to get a feel for the sequence of events to try and work out the why & wherefore’s.

 

It may be because if you were drink driving they’ll argue they still had to insure you and at a greater risk, and thus you are careless about exposing them to greater risk, and might be careless about exposing them to greater risk for your home.

The sequence (date of last house insurance renewal, date of conviction) will help clarify.

 

I notice you said “When I was breath tested I had tax, insurance and MOT.” You haven’t stated about a licence .... you passed your test in 2974 : did you have a valid photo card licence at the time? For a 1974 test pass: you didn’t just have your old paper licence and no photo card licence, by any chance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought my house in June 2017 and insured it then with no problem.

That was after my conviction.

I now have problems renewing my house insurance because I have been asked about any convictions

despite never being asked in the past.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have the same Insurer for your car Insurance and home Insurance?

 

Did you have an accident at the same time as the drink drive conviction?

 

What is the exact wording of the question your Insurer asked you about "convictions" on your renewal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try another insurance provider that does not ask about convictions/disclosure

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

When was your conviction?

 

It may be that you were “just lucky” in June 17.

Many insurers would ask about convictions and insurance refusal as a matter of routine. Either someone deviated from their script then, or your insurer used not to ask, but if they now are asking .....

 

The hub / unlock may allow you to find a broker who can help

http://hub.unlock.org.uk/knowledgebase/list-insurance-brokers/

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did your Home Insurers discover the conviction?

 

This all came about after my bank invited me to their local branch for a house insurance quote.

One question asked "Have you ever had any criminal convictions".

I answered "yes" and then had to give them all the details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The date of my conviction was 13/10/1987. Over 30 years ago.

The questions for the insurance quote were presented to me on the bank's computer screen

with an assistant entering my replies to each question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try another insurance provider that does not ask about convictions/disclosure

 

I have applied to several other insurance companies for a house insurance quote

However, they all asked if I have ever been refused insurance in the past.

I answer "yes" due to my recent refusal.

You can guess the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you not try renewing with your existing insurer?

 

When you say that you are looking for house insurance, is this statutory third-party insurance et cetera or are you talking about home contents?

 

What are the rules relating to spent convictions? Surely a conviction of this calibre should have gone ages ago and you would be under no duty to disclose it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In fact having a look around, you are not under any obligation to disclose this conviction which would have been spent years ago. Check the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act.

 

Unfortunately, now that you have done it and you have been refused insurance you have caused yourself difficulties. You can deal with them that one of the things you will have to do is you will have to you have the data erased from your bank's records. I'm sorry to say I think you should be a bit more clever about disclosing your personal life.

 

Please answer the question above as to whether or not you were renewing with an existing insurer. On 25 May send an SAR to your bank and find out what data they are holding, and who they have shared it with.

 

Stop telling people that you have been refused insurance. You are in a hole and you see don't know how to stop digging. Every time that you tell a new person that you've been refused insurance, it goes on to a database and it just becomes more more difficult to deal with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have the same Insurer for your car Insurance and home Insurance?

 

Did you have an accident at the same time as the drink drive conviction?

 

What is the exact wording of the question your Insurer asked you about "convictions" on your renewal?

 

My car and house insurance are with different companies. I recently discovered that my current house

insurance is with a company who has stopped trading so it might be void.

 

I didn't have an accident when I was breath tested.

I failed a random breath test. I wasn't pulled in due to impaired driving.

 

The house insurance application question asked if I have ever received any criminal convictions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please will you answer my question as to what kind of insurance you are trying to get

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

What are the rules relating to spent convictions? Surely a conviction of this calibre should have gone ages ago and you would be under no duty to disclose it.

 

In fact having a look around, you are not under any obligation to disclose this conviction which would have been spent years ago. Check the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act.

 

Unfortunately, now that you have done it and you have been refused insurance you have caused yourself difficulties.

 

http://hub.unlock.org.uk/knowledgebase/insurance-convictions-simple-guide/ confirms, that for a spent conviction it doesn't have to be declared.

Yet, the question was (apparently) "have you EVER had any criminal convictions", so I suspect the best answer would have been "none unspent that need to be declared".

 

Stop telling people that you have been refused insurance. You are in a hole and you see don't know how to stop digging. Every time that you tell a new person that you've been refused insurance, it goes on to a database and it just becomes more more difficult to deal with.

 

Yet, while the conviction is spent, they are entitled to ask about refused insurance, and that never gets 'spent'. Denying being refused when they can check on an underwriter's database isn't helpful, and may void the policy.

Best thing the OP can do is stop going through comparison websites and 'normal channels', and use a specialist broker, (the hub website link I previously posted might have helped before, but the 'refused insurance' now complicates things further).

 

The OP should also avoid getting caught out being untruthful or inconsistent, as it may get noticed during the application.

For example, we've established here that the OP:

a) passed their driving test in 1974, and

b) Got convicted for drink driving in 1987 (so any ban would be long gone!)

 

So, they may not have held a driving licence in 2017 (if they hadn't reapplied for one once their ban was over), but they certainly were eligible to apply, and wouldn't need lessons, as they had passed a test

Sure, they might not have wanted to get a photocard licence, but what if they wanted photo ID? They could get a licence (and not even a time-limited provisional!) but never use it to drive or need to take lessons (as a refresher after not driving for many years)....

 

Yet (details, details......), in February 2017

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?474623-Photo-ID-issues-with-house-conveyancing&p=4996568#post4996568

However, the paperwork insists that I must provide photo ID either by photo

driving licence or passport.

I don't have a driving licence or a passport so I am unable to provide photo ID.

Does this mean that I can't sell my house or is there some other way around this

issue? I don't want to apply for a passport as I never travel and I don't want to start

taking driving lessons to obtain a driving licence that I don't want or need.

 

Perhaps we don't have the whole story here, but it is also possible the insurers have also noted inconsistencies in the info provided to them......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you not try renewing with your existing insurer?

 

When you say that you are looking for house insurance, is this statutory third-party insurance et cetera or are you talking about home contents?

 

What are the rules relating to spent convictions? Surely a conviction of this calibre should have gone ages ago and you would be under no duty to disclose it.

 

I recently discovered that my current insurer has stopped trading and disappeared so I am unable to obtain

a renewal quote from them.

I am only looking for the basic buildings and third party house insurance, not contents insurance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My house buildings insurance renewal has been refused due to a motoring conviction.

 

Thread title is : "House Insurance renewal has been refused due to a motoring conviction"

 

Please will you answer my question as to what kind of insurance you are trying to get

I'm guessing house insurance .......

Link to post
Share on other sites

My house buildings insurance renewal has been refused due to a motoring conviction.

 

I recently discovered that my current insurer has stopped trading and disappeared so I am unable to obtain

a renewal quote from them.

 

Strictly speaking you haven't had a renewal refused, which is what your initial post stated. Was it the insurer who has stopped trading (which insurer?), or the broker, as if it was just the broker you may have been able to get your existing policy renewed through the same insurer.

 

You've approached a new insurer and had a new policy refused, rather than a renewal refused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case the insurance you are looking for is insurance which you obliged to have by law if you are a homeowner. This means that by not having it you are breaking the law.

 

The convictions which you have were disclosed despite not having any obligation to to do so. They happened 30 years ago. They are not offences of dishonesty. There is no way that they could be said to materially affect the risk which any insurer accepted as part of an insurance contract.

 

I think you should set about as suggested above, contacting small specialist insurance brokers and explain to them exactly what has happened. I expect that you will get insured at some point, but it may cost you a little more. However, you will need to overcome this particular problem.

 

You say that your existing insurer has gone out of business. Generally speaking there is some arrangement for a new insurer to take over their files. Have you investigated this? If you have an existing insurance and you can find out who has taken over the risk, then you would be entitled to renew their insurance automatically. Insurers are not allowed to refuse a renewal – except in very special circumstances.

 

After that, I think you need to deal with the bank. It's up to you whether you think you want to take the trouble – but frankly I would do. You now have convictions on file and you have no idea when they might crop up again. You also have an insurance refusal on file and you have no idea when that will crop up again either.

 

I would challenge the bank. You reposed their trust in them and I think that when trying to sell you a product they owed you a fiduciary duty to have explained exactly what it meant by disclosing convictions and to protect you from getting yourself into exactly the kind of problem that you have managed to do.

 

If you want to do this, we will help you. I would suggest initially a complaint to the bank and to the FOS. You may eventually consider a small action under BCOBS which would be very straightforward and you might find interesting. I'm very clear in my mind that the bank is treated you unfairly.

 

As I have already suggested, you should send the bank an SAR on 25 May to get all the information they hold on you in respect of the insurance and the disclosures you made. You should then insist on their records being erased in respect of these matters. After 25 May this should be a fairly straightforward matter. However, you will also discover with whom they have shared this data and you will then have to contact those people and get them to erase the data as well. I'm not sure whether I have seen that there is some duty on the sharer of data to ensure that all those people that the data has been shared with master raise as well. We had better doublecheck this. It would save you a lot of trouble – but I'm not sure that this is the case.

 

You sound to me as if you're someone who doesn't really like to disclose their details on social media – but it seems to me that when a bank asks you all sorts of personal details somehow or other you seem to lose your inhibitions despite the fact that they are one of the most untrustworthy self-serving organisations you could come across. I think that you have caused a lot of problems for yourself – but we can help you sort them out if you want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following on from the above, I can confirm that there is a duty on the bank's data controller to take all reasonable steps to make sure that Data which they have shared with others, is raised by those are the data controllers

 

Where the controller has made the personal data public and is obliged pursuant to paragraph 1 to erase the personal data, the controller, taking account of available technology and the cost of implementation, shall take reasonable steps, including technical measures, to inform controllers which are processing the personal data that the data subject has requested the erasure by such controllers of any links to, or copy or replication of, those personal data.

 

https://gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/

 

Powerful stuff

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...