Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Part of a settlement agreement.   concerbs over her nane online we’re raised and I was blamed for bad mouthing. I explained I put nothing up myself.  cannot discuss details of the case as per agreement.  
    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
    • saying the thread is locked, what shall I do?
    • Please fill in the forum sticky and upload a copy of the invoice, redacted of anything that could identify you -  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

House Insurance renewal has been refused due to a motoring conviction


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2171 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You may find this helpful...

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/25/25-disclosure-of-spent-motoring-convictions.htm

 

I foresee a nice juicy cheque as an apology coming your way from the bank

 

excellent. This is an extremely useful piece of information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In that case the insurance you are looking for is insurance which you obliged to have by law if you are a homeowner. This means that by not having it you are breaking the law.

 

The convictions which you have were disclosed despite not having any obligation to to do so. They happened 30 years ago. They are not offences of dishonesty. There is no way that they could be said to materially affect the risk which any insurer accepted as part of an insurance contract.

 

I think you should set about as suggested above, contacting small specialist insurance brokers and explain to them exactly what has happened. I expect that you will get insured at some point, but it may cost you a little more. However, you will need to overcome this particular problem.

 

You say that your existing insurer has gone out of business. Generally speaking there is some arrangement for a new insurer to take over their files. Have you investigated this? If you have an existing insurance and you can find out who has taken over the risk, then you would be entitled to renew their insurance automatically. Insurers are not allowed to refuse a renewal – except in very special circumstances.

 

After that, I think you need to deal with the bank. It's up to you whether you think you want to take the trouble – but frankly I would do. You now have convictions on file and you have no idea when they might crop up again. You also have an insurance refusal on file and you have no idea when that will crop up again either.

 

I would challenge the bank. You reposed their trust in them and I think that when trying to sell you a product they owed you a fiduciary duty to have explained exactly what it meant by disclosing convictions and to protect you from getting yourself into exactly the kind of problem that you have managed to do.

 

If you want to do this, we will help you. I would suggest initially a complaint to the bank and to the FOS. You may eventually consider a small action under BCOBS which would be very straightforward and you might find interesting. I'm very clear in my mind that the bank is treated you unfairly.

 

As I have already suggested, you should send the bank an SAR on 25 May to get all the information they hold on you in respect of the insurance and the disclosures you made. You should then insist on their records being erased in respect of these matters. After 25 May this should be a fairly straightforward matter. However, you will also discover with whom they have shared this data and you will then have to contact those people and get them to erase the data as well. I'm not sure whether I have seen that there is some duty on the sharer of data to ensure that all those people that the data has been shared with master raise as well. We had better doublecheck this. It would save you a lot of trouble – but I'm not sure that this is the case.

 

You sound to me as if you're someone who doesn't really like to disclose their details on social media – but it seems to me that when a bank asks you all sorts of personal details somehow or other you seem to lose your inhibitions despite the fact that they are one of the most untrustworthy self-serving organisations you could come across. I think that you have caused a lot of problems for yourself – but we can help you sort them out if you want.

 

Wow, so we are required by law to insure a house if you own it ?Is there any chance that you can provide evidence of that please as I never ever knew that? I’ve had a quick Google and every result said that it wasn’t, though it is often a requirement of a mortgage (I knew that) What’s the crimalniffence and penalty? That is something else I didn’t know !

 

Thread title is : "House Insurance renewal has been refused due to a motoring conviction"

 

I'm guessing house insurance .......

 

Again BF, this is another example of you ignoring the obvious because you are blinded by the chance to jump on someone. What was going to be next...accusations of protecting the company or even being in bed with them?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, so we are required by law to insure a house if you own it ?Is there any chance that you can provide evidence of that please as I never ever knew that? I’ve had a quick Google and every result said that it wasn’t, though it is often a requirement of a mortgage (I knew that) What’s the crimalniffence and penalty? That is something else I didn’t know !

 

My bad. All these years and I always thought that third-party insurance for a house was obligatory. I checked up and it turns out it's not. It's a good idea – but it's certainly not obligatory.

 

Thank you

 

Again BF, this is another example of you ignoring the obvious because you are blinded by the chance to jump on someone. What was going to be next...accusations of protecting the company or even being in bed with them?

 

thank you again. I'm very grateful for you drawing this to my attention.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its always a requirement of a mortgage..not often..its part of the T&Cs of the lending...the lender insists you protect their investment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you not try renewing with your existing insurer?

 

When you say that you are looking for house insurance, is this statutory third-party insurance et cetera or are you talking about home contents?

 

What are the rules relating to spent convictions? Surely a conviction of this calibre should have gone ages ago and you would be under no duty to disclose it.

 

Rehabilitation of offenders act 1974 applies.

You can actually tell them to remove the data and if they ask just state rehabilitation of offenders act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The date of my conviction was 13/10/1987. Over 30 years ago.

The questions for the insurance quote were presented to me on the bank's computer screen

with an assistant entering my replies to each question.

 

Quoted wrong reply.

My reply above still stands to tho quote

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...