Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sofa Club - defective sofa - Section 75 refused


bella-bella
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2173 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

my friend bought a sofa for his daughter from an online retailer.

It arrived defective and after much back and forth the result is that they won’t resolve the issue.

 

He went to his bank and tried to claim as he paid with his credit card.

They say he’s not covered because the sofa he bought was delivered to his daughter.

Their terms make no mention of this from what we could see and it seems irrelevant as he still paid for it on his credit card in good faith and the item as defective and not as described.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they saying the issue is the daughter signed for the goods being in good condition? (How people are supposed to know this when the delivery team thrust paperwork under their noses and say “we just need a signature here” I don’t know!)

 

Otherwise, I think a s.75 claim should succeed.

S’75 relies on making the cc company equally liable as the retailer (subject to minimum and maximum values, and a few other restrictions).

Here the contract was between your friend and the retailer, and it doesn’t matter who / where the delivery was to.

You can bet that if the daughter approached the retailer and/or cc company they’d be saying “we owe you no responsibility, our contract wasn’t with you”

They can’t have it both ways!

 

He should write to the cc company, highlighting this, and if they still resist come back here for help composing a letter before claim to be sent to both the retailer and cc company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why have you not told us which sofa company this is?

 

I would not accept the section 75 refusal – I would put in a complaint immediately and tell them that you wanted to go to the ombudsman. Do this in writing. Do immediately. They have eight weeks to respond.

 

Meanwhile, tell us more about the sofa and the sofa company and we can advise you about taking an action directly against them. What were the defects? Have you itemised them in a letter? Have you taken photographs?

 

Also, tell us more about how the purchase was made. Was it made online? Or was it made after a visit to the shop?. How quickly did the defect materialise? How quickly did you bring the notice of the defect to the attention of the seller? What did you ask the seller to do? Did you ask them to refund? Replace?

 

You will need to engage with this thread if you want some help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Company was called sofa club but seem to trade under a few different names. My friend is not the type to pursue matters like this so I checked online to see that he was covered by section 75 rang his bank explained the issue and passed the phone over to him. They said they would let him know their decision. He then got an email or letter saying it was denied due to it being delivered to his daughter. I could not see why his bank was being so difficult being that I could find no exclusions relating to the delivery address.

I believe there was a problem with the arm of the chair upon arrival and general quality was so poor that it started to fall apart almost immediately. After countless communications with the company they failed to repair or replace and seemed like they were just procrastinating the issue, they promised to come and look at it but then said the same thing again after, it had been ongoing for some months.

I will get more info when I next see him, but from what he’s said it’s a waste of time talking to the company hence going down the claims route with the bank.

Edited by bella-bella
Link to post
Share on other sites

Which credit card issuer please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...