Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
    • Thousands of Chinese companies are making synthetic opioids and shipping them around the world.View the full article
    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Uni/STA International - Student Fees [SAAS scottish uni fees]


MessyLional
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2151 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I dropped out of Uni after 3 weeks after realising the course was not for me back in September 2017.

 

Just before Christmas I periodically started to receive letters from the Uni (Located in Scotland) requesting payment of £1100.

 

Since my departure from Uni I have had no income whatsoever.

Despite doing my best to find employment I have had no luck

 

.My wife works and I'm very conscious not to be a financial burden to her.

I don't smoke or drink and I limit myself to one meal a day.

She is very supportive of me in my search for work, and I don't wish to give the impression that she is some sort of tyrant because I am sanctioning myself in terms of money and using household resources

 

.I didn't show my wife the letters because I didn't want to worry her, and in many ways I just hoped the situation would just go away. I have also had 3 phone calls from STA International which I also ignored.

 

Last week I got a Final Notice from STA International outlining ways to pay in instalments and I don't know what to do.

 

I am just wondering what the procedure will be from here on in if I continue to ignore them.

What is the worst case scenario?

Can I expect a knock at the door?

 

Ps. I was a mature student studying in Scotland (where i also reside) and prior to going to Uni I was in a job which I had served almost 20 years

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you take this loan on?

 

What type, and how much?

 

Ignoring them is potentially the wrong thing to do, what are you living off at the minute?

 

Like I say, start a new thread, and answer those few questions and give as much info as possible.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I will do that.

 

It wasn't a loan, I never saw any of that money.

I believe there was a clause in the contract that I signed to get into Uni in the fist place.

 

I think it was to reassure them their fees would be paid if I dropped out.

Obviously I had no intention of doing that at the time but in the event I found the course unbearable.

 

The short answer to what I am living of at the minute is my Wife

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that university education in Scotland was free. Can you tell us what the £1100 is about please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum......Student loans/SLC

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for responding,

 

It wasn't a loan, I never saw any of that money.

I believe there was a clause in the contract that I signed to get into Uni in the fist place

 

. I think it was to reassure them their fees would be paid if I dropped out.

Obviously I had no intention of doing that at the time but in the event I found the course unbearable.

 

I was only at the Uni for 2 or 3 weeks and I never took out any loans etc. then I start getting these letter looking for £1100, which I assume would have been the fees for the entire year, which obviously I never completed

 

It would have been free (Funded by SAAS) if I had completed the course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Secondly, I rather thought the one was entitled to change one's mind within the first few weeks of any course without incurring costs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would think that eh, a cooling off period so to speak.

But apparently not

 

.I have just checked by dates, I started on Monday the 11th of September and finished on the 28th. Ever since just before Christmas I have periodically received letters looking for £1100

 

, first few of these were from the Uni itself then from STA International.

I have no Idea how to proceed with this.

I have ignored them up till now because I didn't want to be seen as acknowledging any debt

Edited by MessyLional
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you give them notice or did you just drop out?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which university was it? This money represents the fees for how long?

 

You certainly won't expect any knocks at the door unless there is a judgement against you – and you should have prior knowledge that they have started to claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By default you have done the best thing already...Ignore them totally.

 

I'll pop back later, but in short you don't actually owe anything

 

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-0964707606882478:652l7hswbgv&ie=UTF-8&q=Sta+international&sa=Search+CAG#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=Sta%20international&gsc.page=1

 

Dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i will assume

looking at the small amount involved that this is solely for tuition fees

 

if you go look at YOUR award letter

I will guess there is a cut off date of about 1st December??

 

as long as you informed the uni and they informed SAAS you should not have more than the 1st month or two to payback.

 

typically the uni's think students that fail to attend are a softtouch, and deserve to be punished so they don't inform SAAS that you are not attending anymore until well after the cut off date,

 

this then benefits the UNI as they get to claim the whole years tuition fee when in all truth they should only be getting a PART of it..

 

deal with the uni directly by POST only.

ignore STA totally.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx Thanks again for your time.

 

I will have to look out my award letter to check for the cut off date that you spoke about, but it does ring a bell.

 

I myself informed SAAS at the SAME time as I informed the Uni (28th sept),

I have no idea if the Uni also contacted them, but i would assume they did.

 

What would be the best thing to say in my initial correspondence with the Uni.

 

Thanks again!

 

Ps. Yes it's only tuition fees

Edited by dx100uk
mistak/ spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

brilliant. that's perfect.

you informed SAAS yourself, so the uni are trying it on hoping you don't know any different than you owe the full year that they failed to get out of SAAS as SAAS have followed the rules and NOT paid the uni because

it has smack'd to me that SAAS have been well aware of this fiddling by uni's for sometime and that it sadly goes on, but don't want to act on it..

 

for the minute do nothing more.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you wish

you are more than happy to scan up the letters you've been getting to PDF

read upload

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello again folks. I have this morning received a letter from Hadfield solicitors informing me that they are acting on behalf of my old university.

The letter states that "unless payment of the balance as stated above is made in full within the next 7 days from the date of this letter, court proceedings will be issued in the appropriate jurisdiction without further notice.

 

You will find a range of payment methods overleaf; all of them to STA who are authorised to recover payment on behalf of the University"

 

It goes on to state that

" Any claim resulting in proceedings will include a claim for interest from the date the client's invoiced became due.

This could include interest and recovery costs under The Late Payment of Commercial Debts Regulations 2013 together with Court fees and legal costs from the date of issue of the proceedings"

 

The letter concludes with " Should you have a payment proposal,or a query relating to this debt, please contact STA international"

(then contact phone number and email address)

 

Just wondering what I should do now?

 

 

Just for clarity, I haven't contacted the Uni, STA or Hadfeild about this matter at all.

Since the last time I posted on this thread on the 1st of May, I have had a couple of phone calls and an email, all of which were ignored.

 

Where do I go from here?

 

Thanks in advance for taking the time to read this message and, hopefully some direction.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

So Hadfield Solicitors dont feel the need to use pre action protocol ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

I assume that pre action protocol is some sort of due diligence procedure.

 

Do you think that they have not adhered to this protocol for a particular reason?

 

Just to make my position clear, I have never heard of pre action protocol before.

 

Having said that, I have never gotten a letter from a solicitor before either

 

 

 

Lionel

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx, The link you provided is for England and Wales only? (I am in Scotland)

 

What do you think about my earlier post regarding the letter from Hadfields?

 

Should I be worried or is this just another "fear" tactic?

 

Thanks in advance

Lionel

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...