Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bought freezer online but faulty


modo82
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2136 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Agaain

 

In November 2017 I bought a commercial freezer online from a so called reputable comapny. The freezer was faulty and they made 4 enginer callouts to repair the freezer eventually giving up and sending me a replacment of the same make and model which suited me fine as long as i have a working freezer. Ever time the tempature goes up i loose stock and end up going through the whole hassle of calling the company up and complaining. I have proof of all the call outs and that the item was replaced.

 

My problem is it has only been 5 days since the replacement and i already have had the enginer round becouse the moment the freezer arrived we noticed the temperature setting was faulty and now on the 5th day the actually freezer is not working properly as it has gone up to -7* this should be between -18 and -22 as the manual and description states.

 

i am about to contact the company but this time demand a refund rather then repair or refund as i believer the make or model is faulty and we have tried those options before.

 

im preparing a letter/email to send mentioning "consumer rights act 2015"

i just wanted to clarify as this is a business to business transaction would it still be covered by the act. i been told it is covered but ive also been told otherwise.

 

can anyone give me any advice on how i should go about this or any laws that would help me in this situation.

just to mention, Any mention of a refund is absolutly refused going from previous conversation and they act as if i dont even have a choice in the matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you tell us who the supplier is – and also you say that you are "losing stock". Are you a business or are you a private individual?

Link to post
Share on other sites

CRA doesn’t apply for business to business.

However, if the freezer (even after being replaced!) can’t keep your stock from having to be replaced as it isn’t keeping it at a suitably low temperature: it isn’t fit for purpose and they have breached the contract.

 

Do the T’s and C’s state anything about repairs / refunds?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They state it is a business therefore probably not covered by the CRA 2015.

 

Yes, I should have read it more carefully. My bad.

 

Anyway, it is all quite straightforward and if the OP decides to engage with this thread then we can take it further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys

 

appoligise for late response was working all morning still actually at work just on a break. yes it is business to business the supplier is shop-equip .com im going to go through the t's and c's now ill copy and paste the part about refunds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the T's and C's on the site only has a warrenty section which doesnt actually say anything on refunds or repair just says what they will be responsible for.

There are a number of warranty options available on commercial equipment, so please ensure that the warranty option on the product you have chosen meets with your requirements. As part of our improved commitment to our customers we offer additional warranty on a range of products at very competative prices.

Unless otherwise stated all goods manufactured by Shop-Equip Ltd carry twelve months warranty on faulty parts or workmanship. Shop-Equip Ltd makes no warranty whatsoever in respect of items which it does not manufacture. Shop-Equip Ltd shall however assist the buyer to obtain the benefit of any applicable warranties given by a third party manufacturer or distributor. Customers must use the warranty arrangements specifically provided as stated by Shop-Equip Ltd staff or Shop-Equip Ltd publicity and marketing media.

Shop-Equip Ltd cannot be held responsible in the event of a manufacturer or distributor being unable to provide warranty, including labour and/or parts where the manufacturer or distributor has discontinued a product for any reason and parts are no longer available, or suffered bankruptcy, or is under financial administration by a Receiver.

Where an on-site visit is deemed necessary under the terms of the manufacturers/distributors warranty the cost of the visit will be bourne by the manufacturer/distributor. Whilst every effort is made to determine the cause of a fault before sending an engineer on-site it is not always possible to make a correct diagnosis.In the event that the fault is due to customer neglect, failure to operate or maintain the equipment according to manufacturer's instructions, accidental damage or abuse then

In the event that the fault is due to customer neglect, failure to operate or maintain the equipment according to manufacturer's instructions, accidental damage or abuse then Shop-Equip Ltd cannot be held responsible for the cost of the engineers visit. Any such cost will be charged to the customer. Wherever possible a copy of the engineer's report will be provided on request.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that the questions above are relevant to the problem here.

 

Please can you tell us a bit more about your business – are you a limited company or a sole trader/partnership?

 

Is the freezer manufactured by Shop-Equip Ltd or are they simply retailers?

 

The Consumer Rights Act would not apply to you here because we are dealing with business to business contracts. However, the provisions of the Supply of Goods and Services Act - SGSA - are what you should be looking at – as well as the common law contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that the questions above are relevant to the problem here.

 

Please can you tell us a bit more about your business – are you a limited company or a sole trader/partnership?

 

Is the freezer manufactured by Shop-Equip Ltd or are they simply retailers?

 

The Consumer Rights Act would not apply to you here because we are dealing with business to business contracts. However, the provisions of the Supply of Goods and Services Act - SGSA - are what you should be looking at – as well as the common law contract.

 

The business is a Limited Company and the freezer is a "PRODIS GRN-C2F 2 Door Freezer" so its not manufactured by shop equip its a PRODIS.

i Dont know if it makes a difference however i did purchase the item on my personal Credit Card

 

Is the the freezer an upright or chest, solid or glass door, what size and where do you keep it? You've told us who the supplier is but what about make & model?

 

Its a 2 door Freezer Prodis GRN-C2f its and under counter freezer looks like a chest freezer only doesnt have a lide it has to doors its keeps in a clear open space so theres no obstructioin to the vents.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you.

 

The credit card payment would have been helpful if you had been buying the freezer for a sole trader/partnership business because you could have then invoked the consumer credit act.

 

However, because you contracted as a limited company, you don't have this solution available to you.

 

You will simply have to rely on the provisions of the Supply of goods and services act – SGSA

Link to post
Share on other sites

the T's and C's on the site only has a warrenty section which doesnt actually say anything on refunds or repair just says what they will be responsible for.

and you quote their T's and C's.

 

 

There are a number of warranty options available on commercial equipment, so please ensure that the warranty option on the product you have chosen meets with your requirements. As part of our improved commitment to our customers we offer additional warranty on a range of products at very competative prices.

Unless otherwise stated all goods manufactured by Shop-Equip Ltd carry twelve months warranty on faulty parts or workmanship. Shop-Equip Ltd makes no warranty whatsoever in respect of items which it does not manufacture. Shop-Equip Ltd shall however assist the buyer to obtain the benefit of any applicable warranties given by a third party manufacturer or distributor. Customers must use the warranty arrangements specifically provided as stated by Shop-Equip Ltd staff or Shop-Equip Ltd publicity and marketing media.

Shop-Equip Ltd cannot be held responsible in the event of a manufacturer or distributor being unable to provide warranty, including labour and/or parts where the manufacturer or distributor has discontinued a product for any reason and parts are no longer available, or suffered bankruptcylink3.gif, or is under financial administration by a Receiver.

Where an on-site visit is deemed necessary under the terms of the manufacturers/distributors warranty the cost of the visit will be bourne by the manufacturer/distributor. Whilst every effort is made to determine the cause of a fault before sending an engineer on-site it is not always possible to make a correct diagnosis.In the event that the fault is due to customer neglect, failure to operate or maintain the equipment according to manufacturer's instructions, accidental damage or abuse then

In the event that the fault is due to customer neglect, failure to operate or maintain the equipment according to manufacturer's instructions, accidental damage or abuse then Shop-Equip Ltd cannot be held responsible for the cost of the engineers visit. Any such cost will be charged to the customer. Wherever possible a copy of the engineer's report will be provided on request.

 

2 key points.

1) You've identified that their T's and C's refer to warranty, and that they say they only provide a warranty for products they manufacture. Some might say this is a piece of clever legalese, as they may try and deflect any queries to the manufacturer, but it should be noted that any warranty is in addition to the purchaser's statutory rights, and those statutory rights can't be excluded by T's and C's......

 

2) It has been correctly noted that the CRA 2015 doesn't apply here. The CRA 2015 doesn't repeal the previous legislation (including the Sale of Goods Act 1979, as amended by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 and the Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994) in total, but sets out where it replaces it, strengthening protection for consumers. So, whilst the CRA doesn't apply in this scenario, the previous legislation including SGA (as amended) still holds.

 

The explanatory notes to the CRA 2015 make this clear:

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/15/notes/division/2/5

 

 

So, you write to them, noting that you aren't claiming under a manufacturer's warranty, but under your statutory rights instead, so, what was SGA 1979, [namely what was S. 14 (2B) of that Act], but although that was amended by S. 1 (1) of the SSGA1994, the relevant provision remains the same: that by STATUTE, the goods must be of "satisfactory quality", and that includes "fitness for purpose" and "durability".

 

Both of these are to "the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking account of any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and all the other relevant circumstances.", thouigh I wouldn't point this out to them, though they still might try to use this as a 'get-out'....

Was the item described as "might not be durable" or similar, or offered at a substantial mark-down from the price expected for a reliable commercial freezer of otherwise similar specification, that might offer them that 'wiggle-room'?

 

Don't let them keep saying "we don't offer a warranty" as a 'get-out', keep coming back to the fact that you aren't claiming on a manufacturer's warranty, you are claiming for breach of contract for a product not of fitness for purpose and adequate durability, that the responsibility for this lies with the retailer, and that any T's and C's can't disclaim this statutory right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't allow yourself to get jerked around too long on this. You need to cut to the chase pretty quickly because it doesn't sound as if they're being very cooperative. However, if you do decide to issue a County Court claim, do understand that because you are suing a business then the case will be heard in their local court. Where is that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you guys thats Fantastic just what i needed

 

ive done up a email/letter ill copy and paste here. not to sure if its ok let me know if you think its to long winded or need adjusting.

 

Dear Shop Equip,

 

Complaint about faulty goods

 

I bought Freezer Prodis GRN-C2F from you on 29/11/2017. I paid £1017.60 (848+VAT).

 

I now find the goods have the following fault:

 

as you are aware i purchased this product on 29th November 2017. Since that date i made 4 Engineer call outs as the freezer temperature kept rising and ruining stock. The engineer made 4 attempts to repair freezer and failed.

The freezer was recently replaced on 24th April 2017(5 days ago) and I already had to call an engineer straight away because the temperature setting where faulty. An engineer come and fixed that.

Now the brand new replacement freezer is faulty again has risen to -7.

The temperature for frozen should be -18 to -22.

 

I believe we have exhausted options of repair and replacement. There is clearly an inherent manufactured fault with this make/model.

 

I would like a full refund for this product so I can purchase another make/model.

 

please note i am not claiming this refund under Any warranty I am claiming this refund under my statutory rights:-

 

S. 1 (1) Sale and Supply of Goods Act “The goods must be of "satisfactory quality", and that includes "fitness for purpose" and "durability"..

 

The responsibility lies with yourselves (shop-equip) and not the manufacturer as you in breach of contract for a product not of fitness for purpose and adequate durability,

 

I have attached photo of temperature take on 29/04/2018 this is of the replacement freezer also, my original invoice that has the item on it. in support of my claim. I believe you have access to the engineer reports anyway yourselves.

 

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

put simply they didnt supply what thy promised, a working freezer. Unless their contract with you says we only supply broken items of no commercial value then they have obligations to perform to their side of the contract, ie you bought a freezer to do a job and the one they supplied doesnt. Simple

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. That letter is fine except it lacks any kind of deadline. What you're doing here is sending them a complaint that you have rather left things hanging in the air as to the response you want and the amount of time you're prepared to give them for it.

 

If you want to take control of this complaint then you need to start establishing your own deadlines for action. If you want this letter to be their last chance morning then you ought to include a statement at the bottom it that if you don't hear from them is with a satisfactory response within 14 days that you will start a County Court claim and without any further notice.

 

If you are prepared to give them another chance then simply tell them that you want a response within, say, seven days – or else you will consider taking further action. Then when they failed to respond, you should send them the 14 day letter before claim.

 

If you decide that you are prepared to take legal action, then make that decision before you start making threats. Don't bluff. Also, you should understand in advance all the steps. Don't make the threat, find that they've called your bluff – and then you really have no idea as to what the next step is. You are much better off finding out how to go about it because it will be much better for your confidence. There's lots of stuff on this forum about bringing an action in the Small Claims Court. It's pretty straightforward.

 

So, have a plan. Give a deadline in this present letter – decide whether you will give them a further chance and then bring a County Court action or if this is their last chance and you will bring a County Court action – but whatever, make sure you have a plan, know all the steps and carry out your threats.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. That letter is fine except it lacks any kind of deadline. What you're doing here is sending them a complaint that you have rather left things hanging in the air as to the response you want and the amount of time you're prepared to give them for it.

 

If you want to take control of this complaint then you need to start establishing your own deadlines for action. If you want this letter to be their last chance morning then you ought to include a statement at the bottom it that if you don't hear from them is with a satisfactory response within 14 days that you will start a County Court claim and without any further notice.

 

If you are prepared to give them another chance then simply tell them that you want a response within, say, seven days – or else you will consider taking further action. Then when they failed to respond, you should send them the 14 day letter before claim.

 

If you decide that you are prepared to take legal action, then make that decision before you start making threats. Don't bluff. Also, you should understand in advance all the steps. Don't make the threat, find that they've called your bluff – and then you really have no idea as to what the next step is. You are much better off finding out how to go about it because it will be much better for your confidence. There's lots of stuff on this forum about bringing an action in the Small Claims Court. It's pretty straightforward.

 

So, have a plan. Give a deadline in this present letter – decide whether you will give them a further chance and then bring a County Court action or if this is their last chance and you will bring a County Court action – but whatever, make sure you have a plan, know all the steps and carry out your threats.

 

ok definetly for now ill just ask for a reply as you stated. then ill send 14day letter. that will give me time to prepare if i do need to take it to court. i am 100% willing to take this to court.

 

only problem is during this time my business is down 1 freezer which causes a problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you are entitled to mitigate your loss – and in fact you have a duty to do so. If you are confident that you are rejecting the freezer then I think that you should say so in your letter – and then make alternative arrangements for your business, which means buying a new freezer.

 

In which case you should say in your letter

 

 

I believe we have exhausted options of repair and replacement. There is clearly an inherent manufactured fault with this make/model. This amounts to a fundamental breach by you of the sales contract and which I have given you ample time to remedy. You have failed to remedy the contract and as you must understand I have my business interests to consider.

 

Because of your fundamental breach of the contract and your failure to provide any any reasonable solution despite being given reasonable opportunities to do so, I am now treating the contract as terminated and in order to mitigate my losses I am preparing to purchase a new freezer from another supplier immediately.

 

I require that you collect your property from my premises and to give me a full refund within the next seven days please. If you do not do this then I will have to consider taking legal action

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you are entitled to mitigate your loss – and in fact you have a duty to do so. If you are confident that you are rejecting the freezer then I think that you should say so in your letter – and then make alternative arrangements for your business, which means buying a new freezer.

 

In which case you should say in your letter

 

yep done. thanks for your advice guys ill get this actioned. ill keep you updated on results.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok people

 

 

 

Heres the update. i was credited back full amount wooohooooooo

 

 

 

As suspect they left it right up to the last minute and literally 2 days before the final 14 day deadline i gave them to respond to me or i apply to county court i recieved i phone call from one of the managers and at first he still tried to get me to contribute towards the cost of getting the item back to them.

i replied with a straightfoward "NO"

 

He also tried telling me that they have tested the previous item and it seems to be in working order so i replied by simply telling them by explaining the 4 engineer visits is proof the freezer wasnt working and unless they refund me full amountim still applying to court in two days then ended the phone call.

 

 

I then recieved another call simply telling me i will be recieving a full refund and that i will be recieving a phone call from another company in regards to collection.

 

 

All in all good result i just wished these companies didnt exploit people naivety and traded honestly if i hadnt gone further and sought advice i would of been stuck with a useless freezer.

 

 

Anyway i wanna say thank you to all you guys your advice was fantastic.

 

 

MODO

Edited by modo82
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done.

However it's not finished until the money is in and the freezer is gone!!

 

Let us know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...