Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Banned from store . Really panicking . Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi , this is my first post.

Yesterday I went through a horrible situation.

I was in London designer outlet I have been caught of shoplifting after I left gap.

 

The manager of gap and the security of the outer took me in the back .

They asked me to open my bag , I tooked everything out . ( I had 2 items from gap, 1 from Nike and one from next )

 

they didn't call the police , they took my name , my address and my pictures.

 

After and other security came to take my id and my picture .

I never felt so bad in my all life.

 

today I m even feeling worse .

I m scared about the consequences .

They said I will receive a letter but they did not specify which kind .

 

I was in a total panic , 3 man asking me question made it even worse .

I never had any criminal record .

I never did this before .

 

I really would like to know if with the ban from all gaps and from the outlet which they gave me I will also have a criminal record .

 

I work in a shop and I'm really scared they will enter my dates in the database and from my work place they will see it .

 

They didn't ask mr to pay , they banned me for 24 months .

 

I m in a total panic . I m feeling really bad about myself and really bad about my future .

 

Which consequences all of this will bring up ?

 

I would really appreciate your responses .

 

Many thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to the RLP forum.

 

you ignore everything

you'll get scary letters from RLP threatening everything from killing your grandma to murdering her budgie.

you TOTALLY IGNORE THEM.

 

there is NO CRIMINAL RECORD

no-one bar YOU will know about it

it cannot effect your job.

 

as for going to GAP stores

 

don't go back to that one for a few months

no they don't circulate any pictures

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

I can sometimes tell from the style of posting that there is more to this. People shoplift for all sorts of reasons and for first timers it is either a moment of stupidity or they have issues in their life that has affected them which can lead to needing a high to make them feel better and it is this that comes through in your post. You have acknowledged what you have done and (from your post) you won't do it again.

 

On to consequences. You could go back to the same store but all they would be likely to do is escort you out. Avoid that particular store. Here is where I differ from DX. I believe that photos taken could be circulated within the GAP group. Data protection rules apply so they can't distribute your image to other stores. The best way to test this out is to go to another GAP and see what happens. Nothing I expect.

 

The police were not involved and therefore there will be nothing on any police database. You won't get a criminal record either for the same reason so nothing to worry about there.

 

There are two companies that shops tend to use in civil recovery claims. Retail Loss Prevention (RLP) and DWF. The latter is a solicitor however they have the same power as RLP. None whatsoever.

 

All these companies do is send letters saying that the store has incurred a cost for security and want you to pay it. Store security is a 'base cost' for the store and the cost of it is factored into the price paid at the check out by the purchasing public so any claim is spurious at best and just plain lying at worst.

 

When goods are not recovered or are too damaged to resell, a store (NOT RLP or DWF) can sue for that loss plus a small admin fee and certainly not the inflated amounts demanded (anywhere from £100-£150) RLP state that this amount is not the full cost of the security and go on to say that security costs are between £300-500 and you are paying a 'contribution.' This contribution will go to line the Civil Recoveries pockets will a smaller amount to the store.

 

In short.

 

1 You will get a letter (probably from RLP)

 

2 You can totally ignore the letter. There's bu**er all they can do to you

 

3 Continue ignoring further letters

 

4 If a debt collector becomes involve-ignore them too. They can do even less to you (as in nothing)

 

5 Don't worry about any court case. This doesn't happen and hasn't happened for over 6 years since a retailer tried it on and lost-big!

 

6 Don't worry about any police action nor any marks being placed on your DBS file. No police involvement.

 

7 Your employer will never need to know about this nor should they find out. If you move jobs and the application form states 'have you ever been convicted of a criminal offence', the truthful answer is no.

 

8 Lastly, I recommend you see your GP to discuss why you did this. Your GP has probably seen this before and will understand. He or she can offer many things that we on CAG cannot.

 

You are beating yourself up too much over this. Take a step back and read this and other threads to see what has happened with others.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...