Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank won't refund £900 based on Email fraud. Any come back?


D1ngle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2196 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Really appreciate your help on this.

 

I have googled and I don't think there is anything we can do, but thought I'd check here.

 

My mother had a quote for £2700 for some building work.

She Emailed the builder and he set a date to start work.

She had a reply saying it was confirmed etc.

They sent numerous communications.

 

Then she had a reply from the builder on a fake Email address that looked just like his asking for £900 payment to secure the date.

She checked his references etc and it all seemed okay.

 

2 weeks later the builder called her asking for payment to get the scaffolding started. Obviously she thought she had paid. She hadn't.

 

The bank investigated and the fraudulent account now has no money in it so they say she has lost it and it she was at fault.

 

I told her to ask the bank in writing how long the account was open,

how many frauds occurred and when was the first one.

 

I heard you can complain based on the bank not closing the fake account in a timely manner.

 

Anything else you would recommend?

 

Thanks

 

D

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a really curious story because apart from any other questions I have, I wonder how the fraudster knew that your mother was dealing with this particular builder and knew to produce an email identical to the builder's. I find myself uncharitable wondering whether the builder wasn't involved in some way.

 

Anyway, where an account is subject to fraudulent use of the card then the bank has a duty to refund the money immediately and without any questions and carry out the investigation later on. In practice, they disobey this rule and they cause lots of problems.

 

However your case is very different because here your mother went ahead and based on instruction which she received in an email which had nothing to do with the bank, she went ahead and made the transfer.

 

I can't really see that the bank is involved here.

I do agree that if the bank has been negligent in some way in allowing a fraudulent account to be set up then this is a matter of concern but I find it difficult to think that the bank are gonna put their hands up to this.

 

I'm afraid that your only course of action would be to begin a complaint with the bank and then eventually move your complaint to the ombudsman.

 

I expect the ombudsman will find in the bank's favour. It was the bank which held the fraudulent account the same one as the builders bank?

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone with good knowledge of IT security told me recently that people should be careful with any transaction online which is not properly secure. Email is not a very secure way of agreeing to a contract and organising any payment arrangement. The email details will be hacked and the content will be available to fra*udsters to pretend they are the contracting party wanting money transferred to them.

 

Never provide any information that is a security risk within an email. Presume that your email content can be read by people that will attempt to use it illegally.

 

And it is not just restricted to email either. There are people out there who can harvest your data from what you are looking at on your computer screens. Always make sure you have the latest computer security software and keep it updated. At home make sure any passwords for secure sites that you have written down are hidden somewhere safe.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a really curious story because apart from any other questions I have, I wonder how the fraudster knew that your mother was dealing with this particular builder and knew to produce an email identical to the builder's. I find myself uncharitable wondering whether the builder wasn't involved in some way.

 

Anyway, where an account is subject to fraudulent use of the card then the bank has a duty to refund the money immediately and without any questions and carry out the investigation later on. In practice, they disobey this rule and they cause lots of problems.

 

However your case is very different because here your mother went ahead and based on instruction which she received in an email which had nothing to do with the bank, she went ahead and made the transfer.

 

I can't really see that the bank is involved here.

I do agree that if the bank has been negligent in some way in allowing a fraudulent account to be set up then this is a matter of concern but I find it difficult to think that the bank are gonna put their hands up to this.

 

I'm afraid that your only course of action would be to begin a complaint with the bank and then eventually move your complaint to the ombudsman.

 

I expect the ombudsman will find in the bank's favour. It was the bank which held the fraudulent account the same one as the builders bank?

 

Thanks. I don’t think there is much we can do. It’s actually a Common [problem]. I checked on line. Basically fraudsters look for builders Emails and know they’re not that tech savvy and payments is pretty basic. They then monitor the comms on that email and then jump in with a spoofed email half way through so you think you’re talking to the same person when it’s not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...