Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claiming PPI on a CCJ and other debts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2196 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Please, can you help me?

 

I got into terrible debt many years ago.

Abbey tried to repossess my house after a court hearing, but I sold it in time for not much profit.

 

I had loans and credit cards outstanding and I got a CCJ for one of my credit cards who charged me a lot of PPI.

It is seven years down the line and my Experian credit score shows clear.

 

What I want to know is, can I reclaim PPI on all my mortgages and loans and credit cards from over the years?

I know my CCJ is still enforceable, but this card was the main offender.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell us about the credit card and the PPI.

 

If the PPI was mis-sold and the payments amounted to more than the judgement some on the CC J, then it seems to me that not only could you claim the payments and also you can have the CC J set aside. We need to know a lot more detail.

 

And, yes, you can claim PPI on everything as long as you have a basis for saying that it is mis-sold. It's not too difficult nowadays – especially since the ruling in Plevin which is basically that if you were told that there was commission being paid to the person who sold you the policy then it was probably mis-sold

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The credit card was a mothercare card owned by GE Money.

They were charging me over £25.00 a month and charging me interest at over £50 a month as well.

Did not ask for PPI at £1 per £100 borrowed.

 

I had taken out a payment shield insurance for employment cover for a mortgage that was also missold to me, by mortgage salesman saying I would have to take it out to get the mortgage.

 

I did got made redundant at the time of these charges and I got sweet nothing from anyone.

I had to sell my house, because of threatened repossession from the courts and I am now living with my parents.

That's when my depression started and I stuck my head in the sand.

It was very hard to get a job in the recession at the time.

Went on unemployment benefit, but was sanctioned.

Couldn't pay anything.

 

Good job my parents are still alive.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ofcourse you can reclaim all those

 

if you not got all the paperwork and the statements it might pay you to send each lender an sar

but i'd hold on that for a month as it will be free soon.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a little bit scared, because I owe so much.

 

I had a LLoyds TSB account and credit cards that I went overdrawn on and still owe a lot of money

 

I had a mortgage with Lloyds, Halifax, Birmingham Midshires and Abbey National, which have all been paid off.

 

I think all of these mortgage companies are under the Lloyds bank now.

 

I don't know if the Lloyds account and credit cards are statute barred now, but credit score is clear.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well no harm in getting the info

 

if you still owe the original creditor on the account that you reclaim PPI from, regardless to it being SB'd or not, they might well set off against the existing debt.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm interested know about the PPI which failed to pay for the unemployment. Can you tell us more about that please? There could be some exceptional circumstances where if the PPI has been unfairly withheld, it could be more interesting to try and enforce the policy rather than to claim the premiums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't know I was paying PPI on all my accounts.

I am just looking into it now, because of the deadline.

 

When I was made redundant

I did make a claim to Payment Shield, but they only corresponded with help to find employment.

Sent me forms and if I did not show evidence to provide I was looking for another job they said it would be nil and void.

I did find a temporary job and told them, but like I say it was temporary.

 

PPI on my GE money credit card I didn't know it was for unemployment and I did not ask for it.

There was no letter to say you have it and could make a claim, if you are made redundant.

 

You would think they would do that, considering I was paying the account cover as they call it, they would send me the necessary forms to make a claim.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you carry on the business of getting the information and claiming your PPI premiums – as suggested above by team member DX, but at the same time you might like to spend a bit of time getting information about the PPI policies which you were paying in order to discover exactly what they were meant to be covering. If they didn't cover your situation then fair enough – claim the premiums plus interest. If they did cover your situation then it would be worth investigating whether it becomes financially more interesting to try and claim the cover or to reclaim the premiums.

 

If you decide to investigate the cover to see whether it would have applied to you then start that in a new thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

99% of PPI policies do cover redundancy as your lose of job is not by your own means.

 

i'd do nowt till you get every piece of info by SAR's as you can

 

if they should have paid out then you'll be quids in more than reclaiming the PPI premiums

 

oh and that you must be looking for a job too...what a load of tripe

 

this could be fun.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

I will be SARS all my accounts, when it becomes free in May.

I am writing a list of all my accounts details and addresses now so that I am ready.

I have quite a lot of paperwork, statements etc.

I have statements from 2003 to 2007, but some missing.

 

It was just too much to handle at the time, because I was losing my job and heavily in debt and with children to care for.

I think that the banks let me have too much credit for a single mum on a small wage, child support and child tax credits.

The total debt on bank account and credit cards and loans was £35,000 in total.

 

I have enough paper in my possession to have a pretty good bonfire night....lol

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

have you found the Mortgage agreement and PPI T&C's?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't got the mortgage terms and conditions only direct debits on a statement, but I do have the Payment Shield Terms and Conditions and certificate of cover, and direct debits on statements too.

 

I do remember still paying it when I got made redundant.

I don't know how they go about paying you.

 

Whether it's a lump sum, or they just pay the mortgage until you get another job.

But I definitely was made redundant during payment to them.

I did take out another one with AVIA I think, didn't get nothing from them either.

I'll have to sort out all my paperwork tomorrow.

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

scan it all up to ONE mulltipage PDF please read UPLOAD

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What has happened is that I thought that unemployment insurance meant that when you got made redundant you made a claim and when you found another job you tell them and then the payment of the mortgage would stop.

What I did is I made a claim for being made redundant.

 

I got a letter saying they had received my claim, which is receiving our attention to your claim.

Then I found a temporary job and told them on the telephone that I didn't need to make a claim, because I had found a temporary job.

 

I didn't realise that they would still pay the unemployment insurance.

I have been a silly billy!

I just thought it was like claiming benefits.

The money was there if you really needed it.

 

Believe you me I needed it anyway, but I didn't want to be fraudulent as I thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...