Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with marstons Notice of Enforcement - old vet bill ***Resolved***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2126 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

To cut a long story short

 

I have received a notice of enforcement from Marstons.

It is a high court writ for a vet bill I couldn’t pay in full.

My circumstances changed and we ended up here.

It is for 2k.

 

I don’t have this money and couldn’t afford the original repayments set up before it went to the high court.

I cannot pay it and have zero assets and live in a council place.

My Mother died two months ago so everything was up in the air and I didn’t want to deal with anything.

My plan was to file for bankruptcy, I have started an application.

 

I tried to arrange a repayment via the bailiffs office but the woman on the phone said they have to come out to check I really don’t have anything of value.

I don’t work due to illness currently so have only benefits money which is very little.

 

I don’t drive so have no car but I am worried they might try and take a neighbours, which would be bad as my upstairs neighbour hates me any way.

I live on a street with no actual parking so the cars all just park on the road outside.

I had until today to pay.

 

My question is what happens next?

I won’t be allowing entry as I know if I make a repayment arrangement and I can’t keep to it, letting them in means they can break in at a later date.

I really have nothing of value but I don’t want them letting my cats out.

 

I keep doors locked anyway and the windows have latches.

I have applied for a stay of Execution which I know takes time and I will be filing for bankruptcy but I can’t afford it right now.

Just need a bit of support from those in the know.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried to arrange a repayment via the bailiffs office but the woman on the phone said they have to come out to check.

 

I really don't have anything of value. I don't work due to illness currently so have only benefits money which is very little.

 

I don't drive so have no car but I am worried they might try and take a neighbours,

I had until today to pay. My question is what happens next?

 

I have applied for a stay of Execution which I know takes time and I will be filing for bankruptcy but I can't afford it right now. Just need a bit of support from those in the know.

 

With the vast majority of debts, a payment arrangement can be set up during what is called the 'compliance stage'. This is the period of time from receipt of the Notice of Enforcement and the date given on the notice by when either full payment or a payment arrangement can be set up.

 

With a judgment that has been transferred to a High Court Enforcement company to enforce, a payment arrangement cannot be entered into at the 'compliance stage'. Instead, the enforcement agent must make a personal visit to the property. Item 7.3 of the Explanatory Memorandum supporting the Taking Control of Goods (Fees) Regulations outlines the reason for the visit:

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/1/pdfs/uksiem_20140001_en.pdf

 

He has to make the visit on behalf of the creditor to ascertain whether or not you have sufficient goods that could be sold to repay the debt. If you did have sufficient goods (which in your case you don't), then the enforcement agent could agree a payment arrangement and as security, get you to sign a Controlled Goods Agreement. The enforcement agent is legally able to charge the Stage one enforcement fee of £190

 

Given that you have no assets (or car) and are reliant of benefits, the enforcement agent would be unable to secure goods or get a payment arrangement set up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have applied for a Stay of Execution which I know takes time and I will be filing for bankruptcy but I can't afford it right now.

Just need a bit of support from those in the know.

 

When did you make the application for the Stay?

 

Do you have other debts that you are going to include in the bankruptcy? Have you considered a Debt Relief Order instead of bankruptcy......it is much cheaper option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An important point to note, although you have touched on this yourself.

 

Even if the Enforcement Agent does have to make a visit to your property (as detailed by BA above), you have no obligation to allow them access (as you yourself have said).

 

 

However. If you have nothing of any value, it might be a better idea to allow them in so that they can see this for themselves. If there is no prospect of being able to collect or enter in to a payment arrangement, bearing in mind that they'll have nothing to seize to apply leverage, they're much more likely to return the case to the creditor and close it as 'unenforceable' (for want of a better word). If you don't let them in, they'll assume that you're trying to hide something and will continue the enforcement process.

 

Don't forget that there's quite a long list of things that they're not allowed to seize/levy on as they're exempted. So things like your beds, bedding, clothes, washing machine, cooker, fridge, sofa etc are safe despite what some EA's might try to tell you to apply the frighteners.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with DragonFly 1967, unusually in this case you might be better to let the Agent in, show them round so they can see there is nothing of value, make sure you don't have a big TV or laptop and computer peripherals around though.

 

Also any expensive cameras, iPods etc. need to be moved away from your home.

 

Be prepared for them to threaten to take your clothes, your bed, your cooker etc, they cannot take anything that you need to survive as a basic requirement.

 

Then you will have to play the waiting game as they may well threaten to stay put until you call every relative or friend you have and beg the money from them - you are not obliged to do that so do not.

 

Sit in a chair start reading a book and tell them you have no money and no means to pay and they can wait as long as they like, you ain't got it.

 

Be prepared for threats of all sorts but don't give in and say nothing more, they will eventually have to leave.

 

Just -re read your post and I see that you are worried they might levy on a neighbour's car, if it's parked on the street then they can't presume it's yours and they will do the checks to see if it is registered to your address, if it's a shared house and they take it after wrongly presuming it's yours then that 's their problem, they will have to return it at their cost - you say your neighbour hates you anyway so that for me would be a win win scenario!

 

If you are concerned about your cats being let out during the visit - you know when they are coming so put your cats in their transport basket or a cage for the duration of the visit, then you don't have that stress to add on during the visit.

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

The agents can only break into your home after their initial visit if they have levied on some items that then become their property, in this case there is nothing to levy on so they can't break in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Don't forget that there's quite a long list of things that they're not allowed to seize/levy on as they're exempted. So things like your beds, bedding, clothes, washing machine, cooker, fridge, sofa etc are safe despite what some EA's might try to tell you to apply the frighteners.

 

And here is the list of exempt items:

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/1894/part/1/crossheading/exempt-goods/made?view=plain

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t really want to put myself in the situation that I have seen on TV where they bully people and cause a lot of upset. Quite frankly I couldn’t cope with it.

 

The stay was only applied for this week.

No it’s not a shared address, it’s a flat and my neighbour has a different flat number.

One flat is ground and the other 1st floor.

 

All the property’s look like houses but are flats with their own front doors which is quite obvious.

 

If they want to waste their time sitting outside my front door or looking in my back garden they are welcome.

 

As I intend to go bankrupt, their additional fees don’t worry me greatly.

 

What I was wondering is if they send further correspondence to advise what day they are coming or if they just turn up?

 

I had a DRO some years ago so don’t think I can have another just yet.

My TV is old and my PC is really old so they will have no luck there.

I don’t have any fancy gadgets.

I haven’t got any family with money either.

 

I have informed them via email that a stay has been applied for and that I am applying for bankruptcy, this of course will not prevent their visit as I’m sure they are keen to try and earn their cut regardless.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing/merge
Link to post
Share on other sites

There must be 6 years between DROs.....if its not 6 years since your last you may struggle with any Bankruptcy application also.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have informed them via email that a stay has been applied for and that I am applying for bankruptcy, this of course will not prevent their visit as I’m sure they are keen to try and earn their cut regardless.

 

An application for a 'stay' will not usually halt any enforcement. After all, an application may just as easily be refused. However, if the stay is granted.....enforcement must stop.

 

As I mentioned in my earlier post, if the agent is enforcing a Writ of Control that has been transferred to the High Court for enforcement, then he must make a visit to the property as the officer has a personal liability to the creditor (in this case the veterinary practice)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Bankruptcy should not be a problem

as it is the final solution.

 

Not an easy ride and will cause a few problems

 

but you will be debt free.

 

I believe you have to have debt over a certain amount £5000 or £7000 not sure

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

In this situation Redsquirrel, you are probably best to just ignore the Enforcement Officers and don't open the door or speak to them.

 

Just wait for the court application to go through and then send the Enforcement company and vets practice a copy.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiff came out but didn’t hang about and I didn’t acknowledge his presence.

 

He put some paperwork through the door telling me what extra fees he has added and the usual.

 

I was expecting him to try doors, windows and go through my back garden but he didn’t.

 

There was also only one.

 

I assume it must be a busy day at the office.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

It appears that a Debt Relief Order would be far more suitable for you than Bankruptcy if your debts do not exceed £20,000.

 

You don't own any property or a car and you receive benefits only so your disposable income is unlikely to exceed £50 per month.

 

There is a £90 fee compared to £680 for bankruptcy.

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing/quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont agree with anyone going dro/bk ever

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...