Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
    • Hmm, that's strange how they got my email then.  I assume the below is ok to send to DCBL, Nicky?  Hello, I am writing regarding our ongoing dispute and the upcoming court claim reference xxxxxxxx. To ensure fairness and transparency in our communications leading up to the court hearing, I request that you use postal mail exclusively for all further correspondence related to this claim. Please refrain from sending any communication or documents via email. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. If you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact me via postal mail at the address provided above. Yours sincerely, xxxx
    • In the SAR, I received the original application, lots of computer print outs, yearly statements from 2013 and the new emails regarding my complaint. They sent me a £50 cheque after I chased them for the SAR after the 30 days. They said they was waiting for me to respond to an email (which I never received) before sending the SAR
    • classic P2G. I'm sure dianne and Lesley will pop an email to you at some point.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mistaken identity has ruined my credit report for a 3rd time !!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2111 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can i SAR a CRA.

 

 

 

I dont just want my credit report i want to know all of the information and conversations they have been having with the companies involved in my disputes.

 

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

 

Can someone link me to the sar thread stated in Bankfodders sar template, ive looked all over but cant seem to find it.

 

 

Also is there elsewhere i can find the Data Protection Public Register as it does not work on the ico site.

 

 

 

thanks again.

Edited by Luco19
extra question
Link to post
Share on other sites

Click it! Sar

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

 

Can someone link me to the sar thread stated in Bankfodders sar template, ive looked all over but cant seem to find it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

thanks again.

 

In my post #97 posted 25th May

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my post #97 posted 25th May

 

 

Thanks. I was trying to find post 3 i think from DX but looks like it may have just been a typo as its been changed to #2.

 

 

I just didnt know if i was in the right place or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its now post 2 in the sar

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, just to give a quick update, i spoke to the ico today and the complaint i raised with them they have done nothing with as yet as they say they are running about 4 weeks behind so i should hear from them in about 4 weeks time.

 

 

I have drafted all of my SAR requests ready to go, unfortunately the public register is down at the moment so i dont know how i could find out email addresses to send them so might just be the case of sending them all by recorded delivery, ill do a little more digging for emails on there websites.

 

 

Also a question as to 2 of the companies on my credit file, which i beleive are DCAs. They have placed the defaults on my report, however i dont know what the debts/defaults are for, Do i ring them to find out or do i send a SAR to them aslo.

 

 

If i do send my SARs by recorded delivery can i request they respond to me by email instead of waiting for a posted reply.

 

 

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever it takes to get them off quickly. Send them by recorded delivery and then send them email copies when you get the addresses.

 

They will have to respond to you on paper because the disclosure will contain paper records. If you're talking about an acknowledgement then put your email address in the letter – but I can imagine that they won't bother to read it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received reply off call credit this afternoon asking for my ID which is not a problem , however they have also attached there form which states at the bottom " We cannot process your request unless you have signed both pages", this reads to me as if they are forcing me to use there form in order for them to proceed with my SAR.

 

 

Should i fill out the form or should i email them telling them that i do not have to use any form and my letter in writing will suffice ?

 

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose because you want to get underway, you should simply go ahead and comply. However, you obviously signed your original request and so what they are doing is a breach of GDPR. You can usefully attach a letter telling them that as you have provided evidence of ID and you have already signed request, that there additional requirement is an obstacle which you are going to report to the ICO.

 

Only bother to say this if you intend to do it. Then if I were you I would get onto the ICO website and make a complaint. In view of the problems you have with them, I think it would be a very good idea to start laying down complaints at every opportunity. I think in the end it will help you if you are able to show that they are serial breachers.

 

He is the ICO complaints form: –

 

personal-information-complaints-form.doc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I will be making an in depth complaint against them at a later date so i will comply with there form for now until i get what i need and proceed from there.

 

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My next hurdle if someone can help please. Received responce from company that added the wrongful CCJ to my credit report, they require to know if i am a customer, and what dealings i have had with them etc.

 

 

They also want address at time of agreement and agreement numbers.

 

 

Obviously i have none of these as the account is not mine.

 

 

Is my next course of action to email them back stating i have never had an account with them etc but they are sharing my information with CRAs and adding CCJs to my credit report so i want to know all information they have on me and where they obtained it ?

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it's obviously not going to be easy.

 

I think your main objective here is to get hold of the data they hold so I suggest that you give all the answers which are needed to produce the data - even if they are not strictly accurate. You are dealing with a serious problem here and I think you are completely justified.

 

Later on you can try make another GDPR request and give them the correct information and see if they refuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received SAR from Experian, got credit report and a form to fill in asking for what information i wanted.

 

I filled form out this morning and replied along with a short email asking , "As part of my SAR i also want all correspondance between Experian and the companies stated in my email dated xx/xx/xx.

 

Received a reply and this is exactly what there reply was

 

"With regards to the information exchanges between Experian and 3rd party companies, the information is contained within the previous searches part of your statutory report that you have already received and within the comparison data sets in the additional information you could request."

 

All a previous search shows is company name, date, reason for search e.g Application.

 

Am i right in thinking that they are saying they can not disclose information discussed about me between themselves and the company ??

 

I want to know what has been said when i have made my complaint and try to get to the bottom of who has made the mistake.

 

Also on my credit report section linked addresses, when the mistake was made it stated O2 were responsible for the link, this new report now states Experian is the source of the link ??

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are just the monkey, you have to go after the organ grinder from now on. use what you have to show who has been placing incorrect data on your credit files so they cant wriggle out of it and say that as it ISNT your data you cant have a copy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, just wanted to let you know where we are upto and what im doing in regards to this matter.

 

ive received back letters from 6 companies requesting what information i want/along with information i do not have e.g account numbers,previous addresses etc to fulfill my SAR requests, to put it quite bluntly im pretty much spitting in the wind.

 

Nearly every company so far either by written letter or emails i have sent are coming back stating they have no records of me with the information i have provided, name, DOB, address etc. This for me quite clearly points all fingers at Call Credit for there monumentous mess up.

 

To recap, O2 linked an account with myself for this other person, in turn linking his address.

Along with these linked address came 14 other accounts that were not mine.

Call Credit stated that all information added to my report is the companies doing.

 

They are telling me that in a single day 14 companies added their accounts/defaults/CCJs to my report , but yet when i challenged them they tried to contact O2, because O2 did not get back to them within 28 days they removed the account from my report (for the time being they say).

 

However miraculously ALL of the accounts from different lenders were also removed,

NOW if it is the lenders that MUST give permission for a CRA to remove data from a report then id be astonished if they all gave there permission to remove the data from my report.

 

I think what has happened is 1 account has been linked and Call Credit have messed up merging all of mine and this other persons information together.

 

Id like to thank all of you that have contributed to helping me, unfortunately it seems that they have won and theres pretty much nothing i can do about it, ill have to try a different avenue to go down to try and resolve the matter.

 

Thanks again for your help and fingers crossed sometime in the future i get this sorted.

 

Luco19

Edited by dx100uk
swearing removed - dx
Link to post
Share on other sites

Received SAR back from one company so far, none of the information relates to me or my address but for the other person beleived to be me.

 

 

I now have full details of why a CCJ was made , full bank details, drivers licence etc for this other person.

 

 

Looking to get solicitors involved but unsure of what kind of solicitor i require or if there is any kind of specialised service i could use, or to try and solve the matter myself.

 

 

I will be getting the relevant authorities involved but while that is happening i want to bring the company to book for ruining my credit report with the CCJ they issued against me in fault.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great. This is exactly the kind of stuff you want. How many more SARs are you waiting for? When other deadlines?

 

I'm afraid you won't find any kind a solicitor whose prepared or qualified to do this unless you spend a great deal of money and getting some commercial lawyer who charges hundred pounds per hour.

 

I'm sure that this can be done yourself with our help. Also, you will be able to cut to the chase whereas a lawyer will want to start getting involved in loads of correspondence and it will cost money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All SARS are due by the 6/7/18.

 

 

So far i have had the SAR from the one stated above and my SAR from Experian(although Experian wont give me all of the information i have requested).

 

 

I have 3 companies that have replied and passed it onto there relevant dept.

 

 

I have received replys from 3 companies stating they have no record of me on there files. (have no information to give them to generate a report from them).

 

 

I have had a reply from 1 stating they need 90 days to fulfill my request.

 

 

I have 5 requests that have not been acknowledged at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which company has said they need 90 days? Have they given any reason?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest that you begin an immediate complaint to the ICO. 90 days is excessive. I'm sure the ICO will not find in your favour – but you may as well get the complaint in, at least for the record.

 

I think this is a good indication of the crappy attitude that the banks are going to take in respect of this – and I can't imagine that the ICO isn't going to express sympathy for you.

 

It's nonsense. They have computer systems they should be able to link everything together without any problem. Complain to the ICO immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Broadly this:

 

Please see the attached letter from Experian.

 

You will notice that Experian acknowledges that there are at least two correct entries relating to me on their database and yet they refuse to remove them and in justification they say that they are unable to do so without permission from their subscribers.

 

Experience position is effectively that despite the fact that they recognise that my personal dataicon has been unlawfully processed and therefore is included in their database unlawfully, any statutory duties they might have in relation to my data rights under the data protection act are subordinate to the contractual agreement which they have with their subscribers.

 

This cannot be correct. I do not accept that it is possible for my legal rights to exist subject to some overriding third-party contract.

 

This is the basis of my complaint. Even if the Information Commissioner is not able to order the immediate removal of the inaccurate data, I require an opinion that Experian is in breach of a supervening statutory duty.

 

I don't think you need to put any more than that. The complaint is obvious from the Experian letter and the commentary which I have suggested above.

 

I don't think you need to tell your life story. I think it all speaks for itself and the less you say, the more dignified and the more powerful is your complaint.

 

You don't need to worry about filling all the bits of their form. That is really intended for people who can't normally express themselves very coherently.

 

Most the information you need to give Experian is contained in the letter.

 

Should the drafted text read there are at least 2 INcorrect entries on their data base which they refuse to remove ??

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...