Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

3 week course for universal credit


Phil121176
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2191 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

Went to sign on today for my Jobseeker’s Allowance and everyone was given one these piece of paper about a 3 week course to switch to UC,anyone else had one of these or know what’s its about,work coach said it’s mandatory,is this true?

 

Thanks

CA374F84-ED5D-4A2A-ACF5-E4C3DC932A63.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a 3 week mandatory course has been specified, I would expect a revised claimant commitment to have been issued stating this and you have been given a warning that sanctions could be applied if you did not attend.

 

If you are unsure of the mandatory status of the course, suggest you contact the Job Centre. Also ask about expense payments e.g travel costs and that attendance hours on the course count towards job search hours required.

 

Don't know about the course, but have read that preparation courses have been arranged because claimants will be required to provide much more online information about job searches, copies of CV's etc. It is possible that once on UC, any claimant will have more contact with a service centre by phone, online communications and less visits to a job centre. Work search reviews might be by teiephone looking at what effort is being made to locate work and possible sanctions applied if phone appointments not kept or insufficient record of job searches completed.

 

Once all of the legacy claimants are transferred to UC, there will be an estimated 7 million claimants. While many of these would be in work, with not much DWP contact, the ESA and JSA numbers would be too much for Job Centres to handle, therefore I think change as suggested is pretty likely.

 

If you can, try to get any job, if only part time, to get away from the DWP obstacle race.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a 3 week mandatory course has been specified, I would expect a revised claimant commitment to have been issued stating this and you have been given a warning that sanctions could be applied if you did not attend.

 

If you are unsure of the mandatory status of the course, suggest you contact the Job Centre. Also ask about expense payments e.g travel costs and that attendance hours on the course count towards job search hours required.

 

Don't know about the course, but have read that preparation courses have been arranged because claimants will be required to provide much more online information about job searches, copies of CV's etc. It is possible that once on UC, any claimant will have more contact with a service centre by phone, online communications and less visits to a job centre. Work search reviews might be by teiephone looking at what effort is being made to locate work and possible sanctions applied if phone appointments not kept or insufficient record of job searches completed.

 

Once all of the legacy claimants are transferred to UC, there will be an estimated 7 million claimants. While many of these would be in work, with not much DWP contact, the ESA and JSA numbers would be too much for Job Centres to handle, therefore I think change as suggested is pretty likely.

 

If you can, try to get any job, if only part time, to get away from the DWP obstacle race.

 

Thank you for your reply,think I need to find out if its mandatory.just wanted to know if anyone knows anything about it,tried searching but can’t seem to find anything about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Job Centres organise such courses regionally, often with an outside company. So unless a JSA claimant from your area sees your post, you might not get a reply from someone in the same position.

 

Courses such as these can be mandatory, but they have to change your commitment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone

 

Went to sign on today for my Jobseeker’s Allowance and everyone was given one these piece of paper about a 3 week course to switch to UC,anyone else had one of these or know what’s its about,work coach said it’s mandatory,is this true?

 

Thanks

OMG I think I am going into meltdown that letter needs to go viral.

 

Absolutely no way can you be mandated to take part in that in any way shape or form .

 

It not job market related activity for one thing to learn how to sign on, how the heck can claiming benefits require a 3 week course it is just utter madness.

 

Secondly they cannot change your live claimant commitment willy nilly without first going through a disicion maker and then only if DM agree the change is within the guidelines and this is clearly not

 

Third and most important part is in order to start the course would require you consent ! in order to secure funding amongst other things so it is not something to worry about just refuse to sign anything.

 

Finally if your asked or told to do something ask your work coach to use the proper approach and put it in form of a job seekers direction or mandate letter else you will assume it is your choice.

 

9/10 they cannot do this simply because it is your choice.

 

Try telling people on benefits how to budget is so condescending and a shows what little they know but as always unemployment nowadays is a business opportunity and now apparently a 3 week course is needed to understand how to sign on.

 

Is this a dream or reality seriously wtf..................arhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

 

Everyone needs to stand up to this bull crap because they are coming for us all !!!

 

Edit:

arrrrrrgh

Edited by trebormoinet
a final arrrrrrrrrhhhhhhhh
Link to post
Share on other sites

Having looked into this, apparently last week DWP started to mandate long term (2 years or more) JSA and UC unemployed claimants into attending a course like this.

 

This started to be done from 3rd of April, so I presume this is what this is. DWP can mandate this type of course as a decision per the original condition of benefit, but would have to tell claimants, update their commitment and warn of sanction.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having looked into this, apparently last week DWP started to mandate long term (2 years or more) JSA and UC unemployed claimants into attending a course like this.

 

This started to be done from 3rd of April, so I presume this is what this is. DWP can mandate this type of course as a decision per the original condition of benefit, but would have to tell claimants, update their commitment and warn of sanction.

Seriously where do you get your facts from ? apparently ?

 

"as a decision per the original condition of benefit" what does that even mean ?

Care to share what it was you were looking into ?

 

This type of course CANNOT be mandated full stop.

 

Please stop spreading fud and check your facts again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously where do you get your facts from ? apparently ?

 

"as a decision per the original condition of benefit" what does that even mean ?

Care to share what it was you were looking into ?

 

This type of course CANNOT be mandated full stop.

 

Please stop spreading fud and check your facts again.

 

 

Hi again

 

They have not given me any letter saying it’s mandatory just that piece of paper I posted in here,doesn’t even have my name on this paper just the info highlighted with pen and address of the place and the day I have to go with is Monday 16th

 

Just thought if it’s mandatory wouldn’t they have given letter saying so?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought if it’s mandatory wouldn’t they have given letter saying so?

 

You need to contact your local JCP office as soon as possible. Whilst you should have been given written notification if this is a mandatory activity, it may have been issued and recorded as a verbal Job Seeker's Direction.

 

And yes, budgeting, money management, and other life skills were mooted as course material for mandatory activities when Universal Credit was first launched. Having seen the inane "courses" offered by the likes of A4e under the remit of the Work Programme, it doesn't surprise me that other providers will seek to milk the U.C. system now that the WP is coming to an end.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you need a mandate letter but they will not always tell you that and might try to imply you have to attend.

 

Always ask for it in writing if it is compulsory and make sure it is a legitimate mandate letter and not something they have knocked up.

 

They could in theory mandate you to attend this so called "opportunity" but that does not mean you have to sign up.

 

Sign nothing, say no thank you not for me.

 

But really I do not think they would even contemplate trying to mandate anyone to attend that opportunity,it really is a joke, and shows how broken UC actually is if you need a 3 week course and a qualification to claim !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to contact your local JCP office as soon as possible. Whilst you should have been given written notification if this is a mandatory activity, it may have been issued and recorded as a verbal Job Seeker's Direction.

 

And yes, budgeting, money management, and other life skills were mooted as course material for mandatory activities when Universal Credit was first launched. Having seen the inane "courses" offered by the likes of A4e under the remit of the Work Programme, it doesn't surprise me that other providers will seek to milk the U.C. system now that the WP is coming to an end.

 

Job seekers direction must be given in writing same as mandatory notification and will recorded on the lms as such.

 

If no such letter has been produced no direction has been given.

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/114206/response/278898/attach/3/Jobseekers%20Directions.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help really appreciated

Also unless you have an applicable change of circumstances and naturally migrate to Universal Credit , Managed mandatory migration does not begin rolling out until 2019 and might not be complete until 2022 or later so you could be a long way off from UC anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously where do you get your facts from ? apparently ?

 

"as a decision per the original condition of benefit" what does that even mean ?

Care to share what it was you were looking into ?

 

This type of course CANNOT be mandated full stop.

 

Please stop spreading fud and check your facts again.

 

Not spreading fud. DWP started a mandatory course from 3rd April aimed at long term unemployed, covering the subjects the OP's first post included. Either it is the same course I have heard about or it is something different.

 

The OP should check with the job centre about the mandatory status of the course and why no formal notice of this was issued.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not spreading fud. DWP started a mandatory course from 3rd April aimed at long term unemployed, covering the subjects the OP's first post included.

 

Not even the DWP would be so fool hardy to even contemplate such a thing.

 

Would it not be better to point to this mysterious mandatory course the DWP are rolling out from the 3rd of April as in a link or news story or whatever than leaving us in the dark ?

Either it is the same course I have heard about or it is something different.
Either way no course such as this would ever become mandatory.

 

 

THE work and health programme is the only recent mandatory scheme I know of that is currently being rolled out.

 

The OP should check with the job centre about the mandatory status of the course and why no formal notice of this was issued.

No formal notice of this was issued because it is voluntary, that course is run by a third party provider who requires funding, in order to get funding they need Consent from whomever has been referred, no consent no funding.
Link to post
Share on other sites

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/696663/adm10-18.pdf

 

Work & health programme also for long term unemployed ( 24 months or more) from 3/4/18.

 

Might not be the same thing as OP has been asked to attend, but it covers help with CV's, job searching etc.

 

I am just questioning whether this new course is preparation for UC or actually provided as part of work & health programme, who will no doubt also cover legacy benefits moving onto UC.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/696663/adm10-18.pdf

 

Work & health programme also for long term unemployed ( 24 months or more) from 3/4/18.

 

Might not be the same thing as OP has been asked to attend, but it covers help with CV's, job searching etc.

 

I am just questioning whether this new course is preparation for UC or actually provided as part of work & health programme, who will no doubt also cover legacy benefits moving onto UC.

 

It still makes no difference if they try this on the work programme or work and health program it is not a mandatory requirement or a labour market activity by any stretch of the imagination.

Simply put You cannot be mandated to attend any session that deals with budgeting, claiming Universal credits or any other group activity that I can think of for that matter.

 

No mater who the provider is.

 

They might lead you to believe otherwise but I can assure you when it comes to putting it in writing they yield.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi just wanted to update you,I took a risk and didn’t bother turning up to the coarse because after what trebormoinet had posted I didn’t think it was mandatory.Went to sign today and they didn’t say anything about not attending so it must not have been mandatory

 

Thank you so much for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just wanted to update you,I took a risk and didn’t bother turning up to the coarse because after what trebormoinet had posted I didn’t think it was mandatory.Went to sign today and they didn’t say anything about not attending so it must not have been mandatory

 

Thank you so much for your help

 

Thanks for letting us know how you got on and will reassure others who may be facing the same issue.

 

Not only have you saved the public purse money by not enrolling to the circus, not claiming travel costs, but also given yourself more time to concentrate on doing what you think is best, after all you know yourself better than anyone else.

 

As always if ever you are asked to do something you feel is not in your best interest ask for it in form of a Job seekers direction or mandatory notification otherwise, no thank you, I will pass on that.

 

You then still have a further chance to appeal.

 

And make sure it is formatted and worded correctly they tend to pass fake ones over if asked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...