Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BMW 320i with Centurion Warranties


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2201 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I'm after a bit of advice,

 

I've had my car 2 and a half months and the engine has ceased due to a lack of oil getting into the engine.

 

It has had the engine removed by a BMW specialist and they have diagnosed that the oil pump has gone faulty as there is plenty of oil in the sump tank.

 

I have tried to claim this through warranty as the car requires a new/refurb engine.

 

The warranty company are finding every way under the sun not to pay out.

 

I'm 19 so I don't really know where I stand :???:

 

so some advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now you start to understand some of the truth about extended warranties.

 

I'm assuming that this car was bought from a dealer? Please confirm and please tell us which dealer it was.

 

If you look at the Consumer Rights Act you will discover that the responsibility is with the seller and because you have had the car less than six months, there are entitled to attempt one repair and then if the repair fails, you are entitled by law to insist on a refund or replacement – at your option.

 

Who was the dealer?

Have you contacted the dealer about this? And what have they said?

You should start off by getting a written opinion from the BMW specialist and then we will help you with your options.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car was bought from a dealer in Bryn, Wigan called Merit Motor Company.

 

I was hoping to get it sorted through warranty but as they are finding every way out of it I am going to ring the garage and explain the situation to them and tell them they have 1 chance of repairing the vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should Hang on a minute if I were you.

 

We have told you what your legal rights are here. I would suggest that you don't get into a conflict-oriented conversation with the garage at the moment. I suggest that you simply present them with the problem and say to them that as the car has only recently been purchased from them, you'd like them to repair it.

 

If they then start to fob you off then come back here and tell us what they said and then we will help you write them an appropriate letter and start to take control.

 

I don't think it's a good idea to start phoning and start blasting on about legal rights before you know that they're not going to be cooperative. You never know they might be excellent dealers.

 

How much did you buy the car for? How old is it? Did you pay extra for the extended warranty? Can you please let us know a bit more about what Centurion's excuses are

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Trading standards amount to nothing. They don't deal with individual complaint such as yours.

 

Don't say anything to them unless you understand what it is you're saying because if you start bluffing you will be called out on it and then you will lose credibility.

 

Simply begin with a nice polite telephone call telling them the problem and asking them for their help. Read our customer services guide first. Implement the advice there.

 

I asked you to let us know why centurion were refusing to help – but you haven't responded. Please answer my questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, they were refusing to help because they was saying there was no way the problem could of occured so suddenly and that I should of notice that the engine wasn't getting oil to it. They said there should of been some indication such as warning lights but nothing had come up on the dashboard. They also said that I should of heard the engine begin to knock but I heard nothing on the last journey in the car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. Have you been communicating in writing or is this all on the telephone? If it is in writing, please can you post up their letter in PDF format.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the excuses you have received from centurion are simply verbal.

 

I think you need to get a paper trail going urgently. Write an email to centurion explaining to them exactly what has happened – giving them the detail and also the action that has been taken subsequently i.e., the inspection and the opinion of the vehicle inspector as to what has caused the problem.

Tell centurion that you want to make a claim and that they are free to inspect the vehicle at XXX address where it now is. Asked them if there are any forms which need to be completed and asked them to send them to you immediately.

 

Tell them that you are very disappointed that you have already called them and that their first reaction was to deny any liability under warranty on spurious grounds. Tell them that you are waiting for the claim form by return and that you want the vehicle repaired by them as quickly as possible.

 

It is very important to be able to show that you have called them and what they have said to you. Because you have no recording, you are putting down in the email what their reaction was to you so that it is clear and if later on you have to take some slightly more serious action such as bringing a small claim in the County Court then you will have some evidence.

 

I'm suggesting that you take this action in respect of centurion simply in order to protect you and to give you a second string to your bow. However, the principal responsibility is with the dealer. Telephoned the dealer as I have already suggested and come back here and let us know what has been said. Record the call.

 

Who is it that recommended the centurion extended warranty?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a look at the centurion warranty.

 

If they stick to their position then I suppose that they are trying to rely on paragraph 15 and also paragraph 27.

 

I see that their paragraph 14 disclaims any reimbursement for repairs if you have not followed the correct claims procedure as detailed in your warranty agreement. This is an unfair contract term and it is unenforceable. Once the insured/assured risk has occurred then failure to carry out some administrative requirement in the contract will not relieve them of their liability.

Warranty Book 2016 F4.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

The warranty company have already been out to inspect the vehicle and it has been 2 weeks since the vehicle has been in the garage. It is upon the inspection that they have said that it's not tallying up and they are in talks with the director to see if they are paying out or not. The garage said about extending the warranty to 12 months for £250.

Edited by samandroid1998
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a look at the centurion warranty.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]71349[/ATTACH]

If they stick to their position then I suppose that they are trying to rely on paragraph 15 and also paragraph 27.

 

I see that their paragraph 14 disclaims any reimbursement for repairs if you have not followed the correct claims procedure as detailed in your warranty agreement. This is an unfair contract term and it is unenforceable. Once the insured/assured risk has occurred then failure to carry out some administrative requirement in the contract will not relieve them of their liability.

 

Sorry I don't understand what you mean by the paragraph 14 section?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry. It doesn't apply to you. I'm just making a little criticism of their terms and conditions.

 

You haven't told me who it is recommended centurion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hadn't realised that there had already been inspection. I gathered from you that there had simply been a conversation in which they had rejected your claim.

 

As they have carried out an inspection and the car has been in the garage for two weeks, I think you should send them an email – but not one I suggested earlier – telling them that the matter is now going on rather too long and you need a definitive answer. Tell them that you are very disappointed that their first reaction seems to be that they are disclaiming liability because of what you consider to be spurious grounds.

 

Tell them that you need an answer immediately.

 

At the same time, please start dealing with the garage as I have suggested above. This is extremely important. You need to get an answer from them as well.

 

Once we get the information back from the dealer and from centurion then we can consider the next step to take

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the people who sold you the car also recommended the warranty. I wonder if they got a commission out of it?

 

I suppose this could be helpful because that would mean that the dealers should realise that if centurion doesn't do the job, then they, the dealers will have to. This might help the dealer to put some pressure on centurion.

 

I hope you understand a bit that extended warranties generally speaking are a waste of money. You're much better relying on your statutory rights which could last you for up to 6 years depending on the problem that develops with the vehicle – or other item.

 

Extended warranties are really a bit of a con trick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, have you spoken with the dealers yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you referring to the dealer Merit Motor Company or are you referring to the garage which currently has your car?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...