Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Partial Refund - Bank Now Refusing D/D's!


brydonj
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6361 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A couple of weeks back I settled for £696 from a claim of £1100 or thereabouts.

 

Now, my bank have started refusing to pay d/d's which go slightly over the overdraft limit. They are charging me £38 per item and for some reason each time I am getting a card misuse charge for something which I switched a couple of days before. But looking back at my account, it cleared no problem before the charges went on....and still shows as such on my statement. i.e balance is not over limit even after the transaction has cleared.

 

I never had any problem with the bank paying these in the past, and this has only started since I settled with them for my bank charges claim.

 

Are they allowed to do this as a result of a claim, or will they just say that its down to other reasons, therefore able to get away with this?

 

I have a meeting at the bank today at 11, and plan to tell the guy exactly what I think!

Link to post
Share on other sites

We already have an account with the Bank of Scotland which we're not currently using, so it won't be a problem to move there - just a bit of a pain the the backside.

 

Am I still able to claim these back having already settled a claim with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ian cognito

You can, and should claim back any new charges, I would certainly move to another bank if only to save yourself the hassle, may be a pain to move but less of a pain than having your DD's returned and no doubt a second charge from the payee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been to the bank, and they flat refused to refund any more charges, as I had already had a refund of previous charges.

 

Said they couldn't honour the d/d's because they have done so previously and are no longer willing to do this ... hmmm, nothing to do with me re-claiming my charges then :rolleyes:

 

So, another claim it is then - here we go again!

 

I take it's safe to assume that they are going to ask for the current overdraft paid back if I do this? Did I read somewhere that they cannot do this while you are in disute with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol why did you accept only part of the amount originally?? Yeh go ahead and claim, they know they will pay up. They may ask for the O/D back but i haven't seen this and they do have to give you 30days notice. If it states in your T&C's that you must repay the overdraft when they close the account then yes you will but thats only if they do close it. I can't see them doing that tho.

 

Also, i would move banks.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just gone over my od limit for the first time since my claim and guess what...... the have recalled the overdraft.

 

Time to use the parachute and claim for the rest

 

Dave

** We would not seek a battle as we are, yet as we are, we say we will not shun it. (Henry V) **

 

see you stand like greyhounds in the slips,

Straining upon the start. The game's afoot:

Follow your spirit; and, upon this charge

Cry 'God for Harry! England and Saint George!'

:D If you think I have helped, informed, or amused you do the clickey scaley thing !! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...