Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2207 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Crackdown on rogue bailiffs

 

Bailiffs who aggressively pursue debts will come under fresh scrutiny through plans announced by ministers to tackle intimidating and inappropriate behaviour.

 

READ MORE HERE: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/crackdown-on-rogue-bailiffs

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiffs will not change whatever the MOJ does, Enforcement needs to be abolished.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Discussions Forum.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

READ MORE HERE: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/crackdown-on-rogue-bailiffs

 

Just to clarify the position, the 'call for evidence' referred to by the Ministry of Justice will take the form of a 'Three Year Review' of the Taking Control go Goods Regulations 2013. The date for the review will hopefully be announced soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiffs will not change whatever the MOJ does, Enforcement needs to be abolished.

 

So what alternative would you suggest?

There are plenty of reasonable HCEOs out there chasing perfectly legitimate debts on behalf of people who should be paid what they're owed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what alternative would you suggest?

There are plenty of reasonable HCEOs out there chasing perfectly legitimate debts on behalf of people who should be paid what they're owed.

 

Here is an example of why Enforcement is flawed first thing someone knows about a CCJ is when the HCEO fetches up at the door, in this case Sandbrook & Channel 5's finest. There has to be a better way in 2018 than adding fees that make a debt even more unaffordable to pay off by adding more fees therefore more debt.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486038-response-pack-N9-sent-to-wrong-address-got-CCJ-Now-DCBL-%A375-Recovery-Fee(1-Viewing)-nbsp

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an example of why Enforcement is flawed first thing someone knows about a CCJ is when the HCEO fetches up at the door, in this case Sandbrook & Channel 5's finest. There has to be a better way in 2018 than adding fees that make a debt even more unaffordable to pay off by adding more fees therefore more debt.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486038-response-pack-N9-sent-to-wrong-address-got-CCJ-Now-DCBL-%A375-Recovery-Fee(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Enforcement has to be funded somehow though and it can't and shouldn't be coming from the taxpayer. And why should the person who is owed money be landed with that bill?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an example of why Enforcement is flawed first thing someone knows about a CCJ is when the HCEO fetches up at the door, in this case Sandbrook & Channel 5's finest. There has to be a better way in 2018 than adding fees that make a debt even more unaffordable to pay off by adding more fees therefore more debt.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486038-response-pack-N9-sent-to-wrong-address-got-CCJ-Now-DCBL-%A375-Recovery-Fee(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

The matter of a wrong address (and in particular; with parking debts) is a serious matter and thankfully, the government are looking at ways in which to resolve this problem.

 

The notes to the recent consultation make interesting reading and whether we like it or not, the fact remains that motorists very often fail to advise DVLA of a change of address on their V5C (Log Book). Interestingly, from the enquiries that I receive weekly from motorists regarding either Magistrate court fines for speeding offence etc or local authority issued penalty charge notices, it is interesting that most people do in fact update their driving licence with DVLA.....but not their V5C.

 

https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/default-county-court-judgments-2/

Edited by Andyorch
Edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

Enforcement has to be funded somehow though and it can't and shouldn't be coming from the taxpayer. And why should the person who is owed money be landed with that bill?

 

No where money is owed there should be a means of enabling repayment, but where it as a consumer debt unpayable due to a sudden illnesss/disability/loss of job etc token payments should be acceptable, of course the OC writes off the debt, claims against tax etc, then flogs it for pennies in the pound to the likes of Arrows, lowell, etc who then press that debtor for the full amount, and issue claimforms like confetti hoping for a default CCJ that they can use to screw the debtor over.

 

The sale of written off debt should be banned.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...