Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Anyvan booked and didn't show so lost all possessions.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I booked a removals through anyvan for 2-4pm yesterday.

 

We were only given a very small window by the landlord to remove our possessions after eviction.

 

I called the anyvan driver at 3 to find out where they were and he gave me his office number. I called them she said she'd speak to driver and get back to me. Someone from Anyvan HQ called me back at 3.15 to say driver was delayed and wouldn't get there before 4pm.

 

I was very upset as we had been told there was no possibility of having access after 4pm, and the door was promptly locked at this time with many possessions still inside.

 

Landlord says they have filled their obligations, and looking through anyvan t&c there is no possibility of a claim for loss unless the goods were picked up!

 

Does anyone know of anything I can do, to either get my goods back or sue anyvan for their loss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you have a 2 fold problem here.....dealing with your possessions first....

 

Bailiffs don't have to give you extra time to pack your things.

 

They can pick up your belongings and put them outside or lock them inside the property. You will then have to arrange a time with your landlord to go back and pick them up.

 

Bailiffs must not damage your belongings. The bailiffs should not take anything of yours to pay for their costs or to cover any rent arrears, unless the court gives them a separate court order to do this.

 

Your landlord must keep your belongings safe for a reasonable time if any are left behind. You could be charged for storage, removal and disposal if you don't collect them. Usually it is illegal for your landlord to destroy or sell your belongings.

Now onto the removal side......

 

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/experts/article-3260465/I-booked-delivery-driver-AnyVan-website-phony-one-turned-instead-swiped-3k-piano.html

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum...(Postal and Delivery Services) please continue to post here to your thread.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would you say is the value of the goods inside? Are there a lot of goods? Are they voluminous?

 

Also please can you tell us a bit more about the eviction. Was this the result of a court order?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a huge value, but it would be very difficult for me to replace them at this time.

 

It was 2 sofas a double bed and dining table. I took the smaller things myself

 

It was the landlord who gave me the time to go in, but said the sheriff told him just to give me 45 minutes, so he feels he has met his obligation.

 

See my post #2

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did, I thought I;d responded to it, landlord says he;s met his obligation.

 

From your link I have no chance with anyvan.

 

Well he hasn't....arrange a convenient time to collect the goods otherwise issue a court claim for the value

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's up to you – but if you would like to threaten and then bring a legal action, you could probably successfully sue the landlord for the tort conversion under the Torts (Wrongful Interference with Goods) act if he refuses to let you have your furniture.

 

Of course I suppose that he will get pretty nasty in return and try to levy a charge for storage. The landlord is certainly liable to keep the goods in a decent condition and not to destroy them or to sell them. On the other hand, you would probably be liable to me is expenses and if he decided to move them out and store them somewhere you might find yourself incurring heavy bill.

 

I'm afraid I don't think that you have any chance against the van company. Clearly they have been negligent/breach the contract but I would imagine that they would argue fairly successfully that your losses were not a foreseeable consequence of the late arrival.

 

I suppose being evicted was a pretty stressful and distressing time and of course losing some of your principal furniture must certainly have added to it. It sounds to me as if the landlord was a pretty unpleasant person and he certainly wasn't obliged to follow the advice of the sheriff and I think the sheriff exceeded his authority in giving that kind of advice.

 

I think you are in a difficult position. If you had told us that the property was worth £5000 or £10,000, I would have discussed the possibility of getting a locksmith along and entering the property and then replacing or repairing the lock. However, this would obviously have caused trouble although I think you could have successfully defended herself against it in the circumstances. But if the furniture has no great value then I'm afraid it simply wouldn't be worth provoking any further difficulties.

 

Of course I suppose the galling thing is that the landlord may decide to use your furniture in the house for his next rental. This would be unlawful of him that by the time you sorted it out and given the value, I think we would all be too late.

 

I don't often tell people to ignore the problem on this forum – but I'm afraid that in your case I don't think I've got any useful or meaningful suggestions to make. The only thing I think you could do would be to contact the landlord in a very polite and conciliatory way and ask for a one hour window to recover your furniture. However, if you've been evicted because you owe money then I think you're probably on a hiding to nothing. It may be worth trying though. The only thing at stake is some loss of face for you if he refuses

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just seen the response by site team member Andyorch. Now you have a range of choices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if I am evicted by the Landlord ?

 

If the Landlord makes an eviction order against you, you have 72 hours after the Sheriff evicts you to get your belongings. During this 72-hour period, your landlord must keep your things safe in your place or nearby, and must let you get them any time between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m.

 

It is against the law for your landlord not to do this.

 

You and your landlord can agree to different rules about this. This agreement should be in writing.

 

 

The link is to a Canadian website and appears to be about the law in Ontario. Is it the same in England?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woops.....

 

Similar...corrected link.

 

If your Landlord intends to dispose of the goods then he is obliged by law to give a reasonable period of notice before selling them, commonly 21 days. If the tenant owes money to the landlord BEFORE service of the notification then the landlord is obliged under the law to keep the property for at least 3 months before selling them.

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/32/contents

 

http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/2010/04/27/landlord-rights-over-tenants-possessions/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is a "reasonable time" and this is usually a week for heavy stuff. The LL is right and wrong, if you had arranged to take the stuff away on a particular day then he can claim that you have abandoned your claim to title of the goods but if the time arranged with the shifters was on evictionday then I cant see that would fit in with allowing access to remove your goods after eviction. You may have to go back to the judge who gave the eviction order to get an order forbidding the dispersal of your goods but a more practical thing would be to make a firm arrangement to have them removed under the watchful eye of the LL and stick to that arrangement. The LL wont want your stuff so if they are awkward it will just be for the sake of it and that wont go down well if you are forced to go down the legal route

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...