Jump to content


TBI want £100 Disbursement Fee for removing a Charging Order


cups
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2198 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Several years ago l lost a case and got a CCJ, then a charging order was applied for and obtained.

 

Forward to now, just about to pay off the debt and the other party is asking for a fee of £100 for removal of the Charging Order, strikes me that £100 is a bit steep, but they lied in court so £100 is probably nothing to them.

 

Does anyone know where if this is justifiable?

 

I really do not want to give them another penny.

 

Thanks

 

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope..and which fleecing DCA is this?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the fee to Register the charge is also £100...so if they didn't charge it initially ?

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

They charged £264 for a Charging Order right at the start, once l have received a reply from Land Registry then l will tell them to swivel.

 

I have paid over £20;000 for a £7000 debt and they lied to get it.

I now have proof that they did, but l want to get rid of this before l go to the SRA and make a complaint.

 

Sorry to be secret squirrel but l won’t name the DCA at the moment but l will do once l know my position is secure.

 

I hate these DCA’s, in the real world they are guilty of fraud by false representation, but HMCS lets them get away with it because they speak the same faux posh rubbish, and go for drinks together.

 

Rant over, haven’t done it for ages but they engender a fury l cannot fathom

 

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Been told by Land Registry that the fee to register the restriction was £50, there is no fee to remove it.

 

Strikes me they are trying to fleece me some more, do l have to pay their solicitor fees ? If that is what they want ?

 

Thanks

 

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was referring to the court fee Cups..actually its £110 now.

 

Charging order – fees order 8.4(b)

Please refer to the court leaflet EX325 – Third party debt orders and

charging orders for further information.

• Application for a charging order.

(A fee is payable for each charging order applied for). £110

 

https://formfinder.hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/ex50-eng.pdf

 

Page 13.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The company (TBI) want £100 to remove the restriction, that is their fee, if l don’t pay it then they won’t remove it.

 

I am going to complain, they breached guidelines anyway as they never sent me yearly statements and charged PJI on the same account , l think this should be charged separate.

 

I cannot believe that they think they can get away with this ?

 

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

Better pay it then...it will be their standard fee for the paperwork.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And to prove it you will require paperwork form the judgment claimant and consent and certificate ....but go for it and let us know how you get on.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?248319-Final-Settlement-accepted-How-do-I-get-Charging-Order-removed

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I emailed Land Registry, it is a restriction.

They state l can apply and it costs nothing,

they write to the other side and if they do not respond then it gets removed.

 

I would suggest they have no reason to deny that it is paid in full.

They have already had almost 3 x more than the judgement debt, and they lied to get it.

 

I had proof thats what they sent me , which they said was my agreement, was not in existence when it was sent by fax,

l did not have an agreement on that day, the fax number was an old dialling code and the fax number was theirs on that day,

l said this in court and they just shrugged and said it must be a mistake ?

 

The Family Court Judge just ignored it.

They didn’t even say it was a reconstruction, they scanned a copy to of my signature onto another agreement and created a forgery,

l know they did that and the court ignored it.

I know l should let it go but it still really annoys me.

 

There is a saying “don’t get mad, get even”.

 

I am biding my time but at some point l will get an opportunity, but if l don’t have to then l will not pay that company another penny.

 

To lie in court, and l saw their witness’s face, was bad, when she got caught out, she knew l knew she was lying

 

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't tell me you mean this is a restriction K.

the debt was solely in your name on a jointly owned home?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm then why are you even paying it....??

all you have to do is inform them when the home is sold..

to late then for them to get any money..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

At the time thought they would go for a sale, they were very threatening, all paid now but l just want rid of the restriction. And l don’t want to pay them another penny.

 

This has nearly ruined my marriage and life, but paid off so want to move on.

 

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are not making sense

you say the debt concerning the restriction k is paid off?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then its not hurting you at all cups why do you need it removed

wasn't hurting you in the first place even if hadn't paid it off or not paid at all.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let us know when it actually happens

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...