Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Peter McCormack says "ambition is big" and Real Bedford's attendances are increasing with promotions.View the full article
    • How does one obtain the permit? The permit team number is only open between the hours of 9am to 3pm Mon - Fri. It says on the website, To obtain an additional 2 hours, the driver must pay a tariff of £3.00 + booking fees in person at our Security Hut, is that how you get the permit also, from the security hut? What a rigmaroll that would be but maybe just another step to take to try and catch people out?
    • Anotheruser0000 bear in mind that not all Judges are equally versed in the PoFA regulations. Fortunately now most of them are but sometimes a Judge from a higher Court sits in who is well experienced  in Law but not PoFA. and so they sometimes go "offkey" because their knowledge can raise a different set of arguments and solutions. It does seem particularly unfair  when the decision is so  bad . it can also be that in some situations the motorist being a lay person is not sufficiently know ledgeable to be able to counter a Judge's decisions in a way that a barrister could.
    • The argument about the date of receipt is now dead because the PCN  does not comply with the wording  of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  First reason Section 9 [2] [e]  "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges;" Second Reason Section 9 [2][a] "specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;" All your PCN does is mark the time you entered and left the car park. It does not include all the myriad things you do in between-driving into the car park, looking for a parking space-perhaps a disabled space or  parent and Child place@ getting the children or disabled person out of the car then going shopping. Coming back; loading the car with shopping [, getting the children or disabled into the car, taking the trolley back to the store; driving to the exit perhaps stopping to let vehicles/pedestrians cross in front of you etc. so subtracting the driving times from before and after parking can make quite a difference from their time to the actual period parking time. So the upshot is now that only the driver is responsible for paying the PCN and the keeper is not liable at all even if the name of the driver is never known by Nexus so well done for not appealing. You obviously want to keep it that way to make it very difficult for them to win in Court if it ever goes that far. Although your question is now moot since  the same objective has been achieved by the non compliant PCN [ie no keeper liability] just  about the only way to dispute the timing of the PCN would be if one kept the envelope and there was a discernible date stamp on it that did not match the date on the PCN. There is a new Act coming out [and it cannot come quickly enough ] and one of the things required is that parking companies will have to prove the date of sending out their PCNs. We are not the only ones who sometimes doubt the veracity of their dates particularly as the later it is sent [unlawfully] the shorter the period motorists have to benefit [?] from the reduced payment. I haven't seen it on your posts but do you know how long you are permitted to park for free?
    • I was so annoyed and frustrated about the fact this case was lost it's been floating around my head all night. Dave962, are you sure that's what the Judge said? .... It doesn't make sense. Did the judge in fact dismiss the case on the grounds that the defendant did not make an appeal within 28 days? Effectively telling the PPC about the error entering the registration number and providing proof of payment at that time? To me, that's an important point.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need to draft a basic contract with roof contractor


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2218 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm going to be having a new roof on the house shortly, and I don't want to employ some one without having a clearly defined contract in place.

 

But having never done anything like this before.. I have no idea where to begin.

 

Are there any templates out there that I can download, and tweak to suit, and most importantly... it will need to be legally binding in case of any issues.

 

If a contractor refuses to sign a contract... they won't be hired. Any decent and reputable company would have no qualms about having a contract in place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A question, rather than answer. Would the roofing contractor not offer a contract for the contract works and you would agree or revise the terms by negotiation ?

 

When I hired a roofer, they were members of a professional association and their contract terms were standardised, because the works were covered by a 10 year Insurance for the contracted works.

The Insurers only agreed cover per the terms of the contract.

 

As a consumer my contract terms would be simple and protected by consumer law that applies.

I would not be aware of technical specification of works to meet building regulations and I would expect the roofer to comply with these as an automatic expectation under my consumer law rights.

 

This would be different if the roofing works were for a business premises.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it's a nice idea. Prepare a carefully considered contract which contains all the basic terms, refers to all the proper rules and standards for this kind of work and provides in advance as to the remedies which will be applied if anything goes wrong.

 

Unfortunately it doesn't work that way. The main problem about this kind of thing is that if something does go wrong, how do you enforce the contract? If you are dealing with a small business or even a self-employed independent builder, then if something goes wrong you have the problem of enforcing the contract against that person – if you can find them and of course if they have any assets. If you are dealing with a small business – a limited liability company – then it becomes very easy for that limited liability company to wind itself up for some reason or other and to be inaccessible when it comes to issuing legal proceedings. And even if you issue legal proceedings and you win the case – you then have the problem of enforcing the judgement.

 

If the builder or the building company has no assets or if it has ceased to exist, then you have a paper judgement which would have cost you some court fees to obtain but it will be worthless.

 

The only way to really assure your position is to deal with a reasonable sized established company that has premises, employees, – and most of all, a good reputation which it doesn't want to lose by doing bad work or by winding up and then starting again under another name.

 

Membership of a professional organisation is definitely helpful – but don't imagine that these professional organisations are there to help you. They generally speaking aren't too bothered but they will be helpful in that they will have set up a code of conduct or a set of regulations governing minimum standards which your builder should be adhering to.

 

The most important thing is to make sure that the work is insured. You may find builders saying that the work they do is insured – and they may even say that they give a lifetime guarantee. Lifetime guarantees are nonsense. How do you enforce the lifetime guarantee? You have exactly the same problem that you have if you simply obtain a judgement. How do you enforce it against a builder who has no assets or you can't trace any more or against a building company which has gone into liquidation. You need an insurance.

 

We have come across builders who say that their work is insurance backed – but the funny thing is that no one, to my knowledge, ever goes any further and asks for sight of the insurance policy and insurance certificate and then goes on to check with the insurance company that the insurance is actually in place and that will cover the work which is being commissioned and which is the subject of the contract.

 

As far as I can see this is your one guarantee. Get a reputable builder – whose reputation you can doublecheck – make sure that the work they are doing for you is insured. Ask to see the insurance certificate and the policy – and make sure you get copies. Contact the insurer and doublecheck that the insurance is in place for that builder and for the work which is being carried out. You need to get confirmation of this in writing from the insurer. You don't want later on to find that in fact the insurance had expired or maybe it expired the day before the building work started.

 

If you are going to instruct a builder who is a small trader, then it is useful to find out a bit about them – where they live, do they own their own home – et cetera. This is the kind of information that a builder might find intrusive and so you would want to try and find out this information as a result of casual conversations.

 

Insurance is best – but don't simply take someone's word for it.

 

Look up Harvill Shaw on this forum and elsewhere. I suppose he is out of prison by now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the appropriate forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you write a contract for the builder/roofer he will undoubtedly just decline the offer of work.

better off getting a proper quotation (not estimate) from someone who has a good reputation via one of these tradepersons ratings sites or by personal recommendations.

 

When you invite someone round to have a look at the job see what vehicle they arrive in, if it is a van with the company logo on the side then they are proud to be indentified. If they turn up in a new BMW then ask yourself how they pay for this rather extravagant company vehicle. ask several companies and make sure they give you a full written quote and see if they belong to any trade association like the Federation of master Builders as that give you somewhere to go in the event of a dispute.

 

Lastly, how do you know you need a new roof rather than remedial work? Leaks dont equal new roof, it tends to be a specific locl problem like flashing around chimney of maybe a couple of broken tiles

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lastly, how do you know you need a new roof rather than remedial work? Leaks dont equal new roof, it tends to be a specific locl problem like flashing around chimney of maybe a couple of broken tiles

 

We had a leak, and got the insurance involved...

they're trying to wriggle out of sorting it because they're claiming that there's not a singular insurable event...

 

The claim is that condensation or driving wind/rain has got under the tiles, causing the batons to become damp... which has led to them sagging in a few areas. This then reduces the overlap of the tiles, causing more wind/rain to get in.

 

The roofing membrane has become brittle as a result and the wind/rain getting in has caused to it tear in many places.

It can't be patched or repaired... everything has to come off, new roofing membrane fitted, new batons and we want new tiles because these ones are now more than 65yrs old,

 

we'll also be adding vents to avoid any chance of condensation again, and we're redoing the small porch roof to match and adding some insulation in there because we can't get access from inside... average lifespan for the type of tiles on the roof is around the 80yr mark.

 

Doesn't make sense to replace the roof and not the tiles if they may need doing again in 15yrs.

 

Doing it now will also add value to the house if/when it's sold.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Because one is in the insurance section because of the issue with insurers trying to wriggle out of paying for the damage... and this is in the building trades section because it's about building stuff... I kinda thought that much was obvious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...