Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Npower Bad Data on Experian Credit File. Stuck.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2225 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Again....

 

I have a problem that I ought to have dealt with, but have not because I had more pressing issues: 4 sets of serious or urgent litigation that had deadlines, or financial priority:

 

I had and still have a collapsed lung, I sadly have a deceased mother in law, a baby, who ended up in special care, while my wife almost bled to death during an emergency c section, I've bought a new house that the surveyor messed up big time on, I have had 2 new jobs, 2 surgeries and a tumor in my colon.

 

I know they are not excuses for delay, but it has truly been a crap few years and this issue is the last unresolved pain in my side.

All the issues above happened around the time of the N power debacle, or since.

 

Some time around 2013/14 I moved into a house and the N Power Direct debit stopped.

I had used NPower at a previous address.

My dad had been paying as he is a kind man and he offered to when my wife and I were broke 10 years ago and he never stopped paying (despite me asking him not to).

 

Npower screwed the bills up and I didn't pay the incorrect bills.

At all times, I felt there was an ongoing complaint/ issue.

Eventually the correct bill came and I paid it.

 

The end? No. I applied for a loan or mortgage (cannot remember which off top of head) and was rejected.

I had a default registered with Experian by Npower for the period where we were in dispute.

 

The defaults are numerous and are all over the place.

I wrote to Npower, Experian and complained to the FOS and got nowhere.

 

What can I do, the defaults are only with Experian and they are utterly inaccurate. I am stuck. I need help with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I broadly understand what you are complaining about – but not the detail. However, when dealing with any one of the energy suppliers on this kind of thing the first thing you need to do is make sure you got a complete file – your version and there's. Send them an SAR. Send accompanied by cheque so you can keep a better handle on how it is progressing.

 

Come back here when you've got the information

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you a defaulted date in the summary section as well as various D's in the calendar section?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you a defaulted date in the summary section as well as various D's in the calendar section?

 

There are just lots of 1, 2 6 and u markers. Nothing else. annoying thing is they have done 2, 1 for gas, 1 for electric, but despite all bills being one dual fuel the months do not match up. The data is nonsensical.

 

Plus the account was in my dads name Mr X Y, I am mister A-X Y, so that is not accurate either.

 

This isn’t the same property where the landlord was stealing electricity, no?

 

No. I moved from there having bought a house. the DD stopped when we moved and the bills were wrong all the time with stupid numbers on them. I paid when they sorted it.

 

I broadly understand what you are complaining about – but not the detail. However, when dealing with any one of the energy suppliers on this kind of thing the first thing you need to do is make sure you got a complete file – your version and there's. Send them an SAR. Send accompanied by cheque so you can keep a better handle on how it is progressing.

 

Come back here when you've got the information

 

Just checked - They said I need a form, so I emailed and asked for one on 07/04/2017 and then sent a template letter on 1/12/17. What should I do?

Edited by dx100uk
merged
Link to post
Share on other sites

So you sent them the template Data Protection Subject Access Request on 1/12/17 and NPower have not yet responded ?

 

And NPower cashed the £10 fee ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did. No sign of cheque being cashed. With other litigation and chest infections, I haven't pushed it, that's why I have come here? It's all strange to me, I thought they had to deal with it within 40 days, and I thought that "a form" was irrelevant?

 

Sorry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they have 40 days to deal with an SAR and if they fail to do so, you can complain to the ICO.

 

So your choice, send another SAR to NPower and get proof of postage from post office counter ( free to get proof) and see if NPower provide the data.

 

Or contact the ICO to complain that NPower have failed to process your SAR sent to them in December and ask the ICO to chase it up.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taken from ICO website, https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/principle-6-rights/subject-access-request/

 

Can I require individuals to use a specially designed form when making subject access requests?

 

No. Many organisations produce subject access request forms, and you may invite individuals to use such a form as long as you make it clear that this is not compulsory and you do not try to use this as a way of extending the 40-day time limit for responding. Standard forms can make it easier for you to recognise a subject access request and make it easier for the individual to include all the details you might need to locate the information they want.

However, any request in writing must be considered as a valid request, whatever the format.

 

 

 

I would be inclined to go straight to the ICO, informing them that N-Power have not processed your SAR and are insisting on you completing a form in order to process your request even though this goes against the principles of processing SAR's.

 

 

N-Power really are a crafty lot, aren't they?

Any pearls of wisdom that I give on the CAG forums is based on previous experiences and knowledge I have gained from being on these forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot abide them,

they were being fined for all sorts of stuff during this period,

yet they still act like they did nothing wrong whatsoever,

not sending me bills and then sending me incorrect bills and at the same time sending inaccurate markets to Experian.

 

This is a huge waste of time and I hate them for it.

It does not help that my collapsed lung is infected again and now I am not sleeping.

 

I will send another SAR as Uncle Bulgaria suggests, and I will simultaneously make a complaint to the ICO.

 

Is this something I could file proceedings regarding?

I am much more comfortable in court than I am dealing with Quangos like the ICO and the FOS?

 

Thanks to both of you for the advice. :)

Edited by dx100uk
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, you can file proceedings and it is good that you would be prepared to go the distance.

 

However, at this stage, your strongest claim would be for data protection breaches regarding not processing your SAR. Which won't get you much compo. I think you would be better off waiting for an actual SAR to come through, going through it with a fine tooth comb and finding as much ammunition as you can to throw back at them.

 

Perhaps with your health as it is at the moment, waiting on SAR/ICO responses might not be a bad thing? You are still persuing available avenues but giving yourself some breathing space to get your health in better shape before the big battle.

Edited by dx100uk
quote

Any pearls of wisdom that I give on the CAG forums is based on previous experiences and knowledge I have gained from being on these forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice.

 

You are absolutely correct that is probably best that I do not start proceedings right now and once I have all the data, the proceedings may be easier/avoidable.

 

I will go through the formal processes next week, when I am better. The antibiotics are working, slowly.

 

Thank you for the wise counsel. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...