Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Part of a settlement agreement.   concerbs over her nane online we’re raised and I was blamed for bad mouthing. I explained I put nothing up myself.  cannot discuss details of the case as per agreement.  
    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
    • saying the thread is locked, what shall I do?
    • Please fill in the forum sticky and upload a copy of the invoice, redacted of anything that could identify you -  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Suspension Question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2024 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

On Friday I got pulled into my bosses office who informed me that I was suspended with immediate effect and the HR Dept will be in touch.

The reason given was that fuel went into my demo and another company demo reg number was used.

Now, I will point out this was not done by me nor was it instructed by me for this to happen, but because the other person said I told him to do this, I get suspended.

 

There is no proof that I instructed this to happen and there is video evidence that the other person actually put fuel in the car....

Where do I stand?

Can anyone advise?

 

I have also asked how long the suspension is for but I am getting told that there is no timescale.

Is this legal?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Its called investigation. Suspension while under investigation is very normal for something that is serious.

 

And yes, it is perfectly legal and standard in almost any company.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its called investigation. Suspension while under investigation is very normal for something that is serious.

 

And yes, it is perfectly legal and standard in almost any company.

 

 

 

Thanks, I knew it was/is standard but no timescale to my suspension? Is that normal...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is absolutely legal if:

A) You are suspended pending the investigation, and

B) You remain on full pay.

 

Although it doesn’t feel like it, suspension on full pay is a “neutral act”, it doesn’t imply guilt or any funding of guilt, and you are no worse off (in fact you are getting paid and not having to do your normal work!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Although it shouldnt be prolonged. Its not unusual for an investigation to last a few weeks in some cases, but the employer should make investigations thorough and timely. Once they investigate, they will then call you to a meeting, where you can put your side forward.

 

remember, its an investigation, so they have to gather all evidence since something serious has occured. Whether you did what was alleged or the other party did and is trying to pass the buck.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I knew it was/is standard but no timescale to my suspension? Is that normal...

 

Can you tell how long their investigation will take?

Can they?

 

If not, then no timescale (or “while the investigation is in progress”) is all you can expect!

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing, do NOT start contacting your employer asking how long it will take. Let them investigate, unless its a very long time ( multiple weeks). Also, are you in a union?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all, they have given no indication off any sort off timescale. I looked through our Co policy handbook and there is no mention off it at all. I just presumed that there is a timescale that they had to follow. I am in Unite, so going to contact them but obv this is stressing me out as I have never been in this situation before.

Thanks again, really appreaciate your replies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you are in a union, inform your rep, and let them help. You have to follow a set procedure now. Dont get caught out.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since you are in a union, inform your rep, and let them help. You have to follow a set procedure now. Dont get caught out.

 

Thanks, going to speak to them on Monday. Can I ask what you mean by 'dont get caught out'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Breaking procedure, or speaking to other people, hampering any investigation. Let your employer investigate, let your union rep sort things out in the meantime and find out whats going on.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all, they have given no indication off any sort off timescale. I looked through our Co policy handbook and there is no mention off it at all. I just presumed that there is a timescale that they had to follow. I am in Unite, so going to contact them but obv this is stressing me out as I have never been in this situation before.

Thanks again, really appreaciate your replies

 

Try not to panic or get stressed, just enjoy getting paid for doing nothing and let them do their investigation. I'd also submit a SAR to your employers requesting a copy of everything they hold , written, email or CCTV. This at least will let them know you're not going to put up with any nonsense from them.

Start every day off with a smile and get it over with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Breaking procedure, or speaking to other people, hampering any investigation. Let your employer investigate, let your union rep sort things out in the meantime and find out whats going on.

 

 

Ah, ok get what you mean now. I wouldnt do that anyway incase it made any sort off impact on their investigation.

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try not to panic or get stressed, just enjoy getting paid for doing nothing and let them do their investigation. I'd also submit a SAR to your employers requesting a copy of everything they hold , written, email or CCTV. This at least will let them know you're not going to put up with any nonsense from them.

 

Hi, I never even thought off this but will be sending a letter in ref it.

Thanks for that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try not to panic or get stressed, just enjoy getting paid for doing nothing and let them do their investigation. I'd also submit a SAR to your employers requesting a copy of everything they hold , written, email or CCTV. This at least will let them know you're not going to put up with any nonsense from them.

 

why on earth would you do any of that?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats is NOT how this works and is actually very bad advice. His union is there for a reason. he needs to use them and he is doing so on monday. The union will obtain the correct information.

 

Asking for a SAR etc will get him nowhere, and is totally unneeded

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's your opinion. A union is only as good as its local rep, if the rep is useless then you're effectively on your own. Do not rely on a union to save you, you need to be proactive in your own defence.

Start every day off with a smile and get it over with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not opinion. fact.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not request a SAR until after they have finished their investigation. If you were to request one now all you would do is delay the investigation and annoy the heck out of them. The only time to request a SAR is if the investigation does not go in your favour and you need to take legal action. To be honest with you, you won't get any tangible information from a SAR because they will deem it sensitive information with could be detrimental to the other parties involved if disclosed to you. If you have a copy of your contract and the company handbook, that is all you need at this point.

 

Contact your union rep. Let your HR department carry out the investigation and enjoy your time off but be available at all times. Don't speak to anyone else apart from your union rep. Trust no-one.

 

Good luck. I hope it works out in your favour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too would avoid a SA\r and ride it out An aggressive stance raises suspicion; innocent people dont need to set up a giant defence. They're simply innocent.o

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all, thanks for all the replies. Really appreciate it, bit stressed out this morning about it again. I will speak to my union tomorrow and take it from there but I am up for a fight as this is not the first time I have been accused off something that I never did and other people seem to get away with doing, in my eyes, worse things that what I am getting accused off and nothing happened to those people, not even any HR investigations...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Give the union all the information and let them know what you expect from them, don't accept a second rate service. Ultimately, if the union proves useless then the fight is down to you, pull no punches and attack on all fronts.

 

Passivity is not your friend, attack, attack, attack, but also try to keep a sense of perspective about the whole thing. When all is said and done it's just a job, not life and death.

Start every day off with a smile and get it over with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is extremely unwise to attack on all fronts. Especially as it's just a standard investigation

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like someone at your company has seen somehting and jumped to the wrong conclusion.

 

i would suggest that you are not agressive and use what you know in a dispassionate way and the chances are nothing will come of this. If you say you are going after them for this slur on your character or whatever they may well pull up the drawbridge and take a decision that is bad for them in the long run but bad for you now.

 

Once they have made a decision it can be challenged anyway but then you will be on firmer ground. No, it isnt fair but getting your rep to have a word with the person running the meeting well beforehand may mean that it doesnt happen.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...