Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell claimform - newday GE Capital Bank House of Fraser storecard


EveOwes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 595 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have received a claim form from the county court for an o/s HoF storecard debt.

The amount claimed before charges is £526.

 

I stopped paying HoF/Newday about a year or more (maybe two years) ago as I couldn't keep up with the charges they kept adding to my bill.

The original purchases amount was around £120 approx but then the late payment charges happened and interest on those then more late charges and more interest and now it's just got out of hand.

 

I am tempted to phone Lowell and tell them that but I know it won't make a difference.

 

I have used advice given to me previously to respond to these court claims and I still have that on here so I can look it up.

Should I follow the same course of action?

 

Lowell have been writing to me and warning me etc but I see so many letters that I just don't read them anymore.

 

Help please.

Thank you in advance again for your assistance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd

 

Date of issue – 15/3/18

 

Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total) -

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please type out their particulars of claim in full (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down.

 

1) The defendant opened a house of fraser regulated consumer credit account under reference (number) on 6/7/02 (the "agreement").

2) In breach of the agreement, the defendant failed to maintain the required payments and the agreement was terminated.

3) The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 26/1/17 and written notice given to the defendant.

4) Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £488 remains due and outstanding. And the claimant claims a) the said sum of £488 b) interest pursuant to s69 Count Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue accruing at a daily rate of £0.107, but limited to one year, being £39 c) costs

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) Yes only read it today

 

What is the value of the claim? With legal fees the value has risen to £657 (£527, pls £60 court fee, plus £70 legal rep)

Is the claim for - a storecard account with House of Fraser but most of the amount o/s is late payment/interest charges and only approx £120 is on goods

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? The say I entered into it in 2002. I cannot remember though.

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. It has been assigned to the claimant.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? need to check

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I think so - it was Newday handling this but can't remember what they sent me.

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? I cannot confirm as I have mislaid all my Lowell letters

 

Why did you cease payments? No job, no money, and unable to get them to stop adding on the charges.

What was the date of your last payment? not sure, it was about 2 years ago I think

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? I called them and informed them I was unemployed. I asked them to stop adding on late payment charges. They said I needed to complete an income/expenditure form. I can't remember whether I received this or not.

 

 

If you have not already done so – send a CCA Request to the claimant for a copy of your agreement (I haven't done this yet)

 

Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts (I haven't done this yet)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is an old EDF account for £2k which has also been assigned to Lowell. So I can expect another court case if I don't respond to them. I wish I had responded to the HoF one now but felt unable to cope with these.

 

I am very depressed and have been given a 'sick note' for 3 months due to depression. I am drowning in these debts, like there's so many of them, some quite small but when you have no income hardly, they seem huge. I've been such a fool not dealing with them.

 

I went to CAB the other week for help with a universal credit problem but the guy I saw knew nothing about UC and was actually falling asleep while he was trying to look something up. I told him my UC had been stopped before xmas because they 'discovered' I was getting a pension.

 

I argued that I was told not to declare the pension and this was stated on a Gov webpage, but not been able to find it again. The jobcentre staff knew I was getting a pension because they discussed it with me.

 

I only get around £650 a month. I don't get anything else. My rent share is £800/month.

 

I am borrowing off people but they don't want to lend me anymore as they think I should have sorted it by now but I'm getting nowhere with DWP or CAB. Feel like giving up.

 

Sorry for going on. Thanks for the advice you give on here.

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?

 

Yes I did, I have just been reading it, and probably should have called them then, but I didn't read it till today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

 

 

I wouldn't worry about the Lowell/EDF one

if you read lowells letters it probably says our client EDF?

 

which means there is stuff all they can do,

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

I've done the AOS and now need to file my defence.

 

All I know is the truth - I am unemployed and don't receive enough money to cover even my rent.

 

I am on long-term sick with depression and on meds too now.

 

The original amount spent on the card was only around £120-150?

 

The amount they want is all charges and interest.

 

This doesn't sound like much of a defence?

 

Any advice?

 

Thanks again.

 

ps: I noticed on the threads that Lowell are very busy in court!!!

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

they all always are 750'000 speculative claims are issued every year.

 

defence is not due till 16th april

did you send CCA/CPR?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sending CCA/CPR in the morning - I have typed them up and printed them.

I hope it's not too late, but I will send them anyway.

 

I struggle to think most days to be honest and walk around in a daze.

Also my daughter has had a cancer scare which has been a major distraction these last couple of weeks.

 

Poor excuses maybe but I am trying to get with the programme.

I think the pills are making me drowsy as I keep falling asleep.

Never felt so lethargic in my life.

Sorry, I know it's not really relevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they should have been sent 2 weeks ago ideally

 

get you're head out the fuzzi box

 

else you'll stuff this up by default

its so easy to do .. a few simple things guarantee you a good chance of winning.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

I sent CCA and CPR on 3 April and on 17 April I received a letter from the solicitors enclosing a copy of the Notice of Assignment.

Their letter was dated 12 April but the envelope shows it being posted on 16 April.

They say in the letter that they have requested a coy of the agreement, statements and default notice from the original creditor and will contact me when a response is received.

 

I still find it hard to believe the claim is for £657 despite me not originally owing anywhere near that. It's mostly all fees, interest and charges etc.

 

I now have to put a defence in by tomorrow I believe.

What should I write?

I have a copy of a defence I filed for a Tesco claim but it's not quite the same.

That defence indicated the claim was vague etc but these lot seem more confident.

Any advice?

 

Thanks for helping me.

Here's a copy of what i wrote for Tesco:

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague

and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case

below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular

allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings with Tesco Personal Finance PLC .I do not recollect the account number or alleged debt the claimant refers to having failed to adequately particularise its claim.I have therefore sought

verification from the claimant by way of a section 78 request.

 

3.Paragraph 2 is denied I am unaware of what account the claimant refers to.

 

4.Paragraph 3 is denied I am unaware of what account the claimant refers to. I do not recall receiving any Notice of Assignment

which the claimant fails to date or inform or ever having being approached pre litigation with regards this alleged debt.

 

5.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show and evidence any breach and service of a default notice/termination notice:

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under

statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

6. On receipt of this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a section 78 for copies of any documents and the agreement referred to within the Claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. To date they have failed to comply to my section 78 request and remain in default of my request.

 

7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

erm post 8?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no wait

needs checking.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are a litigant in person [representing yourself]

and are given certain leeway

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Done it; sorry, just seen your message: This is what I put:

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not yet been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings with NewDay. I do not recollect the account number or alleged debt the claimant refers to having failed to adequately particularise its claim. I have therefore sought verification from the claimant by way of a section 78 request.

 

3.Paragraph 2 is denied I am unaware of what account the claimant refers to where payments were not made.

 

4.Paragraph 3 is denied I am unaware of what account the claimant refers to.

I do not recall receiving any Notice of Assignment but the claimant has issued a photocopy after the defendant requested.

 

5.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show and evidence any breach and service of a default notice/termination notice:

© show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

(d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

6. On receipt of this claim I requested by way of a CPR 31.14 request and a section 78 for copies of any documents and the agreement referred to within the claimants particulars to establish what the claim is for. To date they have failed to comply to my section 78 request and remain in default of my request.

 

7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer crediticon Act 1974.

 

9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you did remove Tesco pers finance and put newday house of fraser storecard?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes I did change Tesco to NewDay.

 

Sorry, I guess I panicked again. Saw the date and when I opened MCol and it let me enter something I just did it in case it closed on me or something. I always panic.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

golden rule is always ask here FIRST before you do ANYTHING to do a court claim

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi again

 

I've received a response from the solicitors - Lowell Solicitors.

They sent me a copy of the notice of assignment they sent to me.

They dated their cover letter 12 April but didn't post it until 16 April.

They wrote again on 23 April and said they were waiting for further documents from Newday but as I had entered a defence I had to respond to all court correspondence. They also invited me to make a payment plan offer.

 

On 24 April they wrote to me again with a copy of the Directions Questionnaire which they have lodged with the court, and said the court would send one to me to complete (not had it yet). This is about mediation I think.

 

I am struggling to keep up with it all as I am also battling a local council who I have four parking tickets with that are now costing me nearly £700 as I could not afford to pay the original discounted fines. Not sure who scares me the most, court or council.

 

Thanks for the ongoing advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the status on MCOL and see if its gone to allocation.

 

Directions questionnaire is to allocate the claim to your local county court,

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?406099-LEGAL-N180-Directions-Questionnaire-(Small-Claims-Track)-**Correct-at-Sept-2016**

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

check end of Tuesday.

if its not changed they might be lying [lowells]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

I eventually received copies of the documents requested in the early stages of this.

I now have an appt for a mediation telephone call tomorrow morning.

 

Not sure how to handle this but guessing I would argue to total being demanded by Lowell on the basis that I advised NewDay of my financial position and they did nothing but kept adding on charges and interest.

 

Taking the total due from around £120-150 to over £500.

In fact, the last payment they took from my account was for £185 which was mostly charges and interest.

This, in my view, should be considered the full and final payment.

 

Lowell have also sent me a pre-legal assessment on my old EDF bill offering me a 50% discount.

 

Any advice on these situations?

Thanks for all your help.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...