Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry I didn’t think to come and update this.    So the outcome was that he went to court. Apparently the judge told the landlord off for not sending a letter before action but did nothing about it. He didn’t accept all the damages the landlord claimed, and told him off for accusing my friend of deliberately and maliciously damaging anything, and he awarded him small amounts of the damages he claimed for. The landlord had also made an awful lot of things up that never existed and accused my friend of stealing them, and the judge didn’t accept any of those claims.   However, I’m back asking advice now. So he made an offer of payment via the court forms, sometime before Christmas and straight after the hearing. The landlord didn’t reply so the court accepted the payments.  My friend has been paying the £10 a month each month. Then a couple of days ago he had received a letter from court with a hearing date in a couple of weeks, and a very irate letter from the landlord saying that my friend has consistently lied and that nothing he says should be believed, and that he wants the bailiffs to be called on him and that he absolutely refuses the payment plan. The letter is marked as received by the courts in December and this is the first that’s been sent since then. My friend and his wife are now panicked, what does this mean? And can they now get bailiffs sent round? He earns an ok wage, which somehow the landlord has referred to in his letter, but he equally has a lot of expenditure and can’t afford to pay any more. What will happen at this hearing and can they send out the bailiffs just because the landlord wants them to?    I have no clue what to advise him, can you help at all please?
    • Thanks Bank – I took your cynicism / experience on board and responded thus: Thank you for your response Mr Schnur  I set out my position quite clearly in my letter of claim and nothing has changed. Your insurance requirement is unlawful and is contrary to section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act, and also section 72 of the same statute. I would also refer you to the outcomes in PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729).  My deadline for action - 1 May 2024 - still stands.
    • The other thing is that you are making a big mistake imagining that they are at all concerned about wasting court costs et cetera. They are only concerned about being obstructive and discouraging others.  
    • I have dad's last will from 2019 which mentions the trust. I am in the process of going through probate as the only thing that needs probate is a couple of shares he has (under £3000).  Speaking to my brother and my dad's wife they wouldn't mind going with another solicitor if we need to pay extra for the trust.   
    • That's fine. My taste is for something rather more brusque and that he won't forget – but it's your letter
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Confusion over Recycling


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2219 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Why is recycling such a confusing issue ?

 

British consumers are in the dark about exactly what household waste they can recycle, a new poll has revealed, with plastic soap dispenser tops, dirty kitchen roll and wrapping paper topping the list of things they wrongly consider recyclable.

Research shows that Britons are more aware than ever of how recycling can help the environment. However, the majority are putting out contaminated recycling due to common misunderstandings, thereby doing more harm than good.

Eight out of ten Britons believe recycling makes a difference, the research for the British Science Association (BSA) shows, yet when quizzed on exactly what items can go into their recycling bins, none of the 2,000 adult Britons surveyed got full marks.

 

For the full story: http://cag.tw/26n7

 

I am horrified at the reports regarding plastic specifically and the damage it is doing to wild life and the environment.

 

Why can we not be given clear guidelines rather than being threatened with not having our bins emptied or fines.

 

Whilst common sense should make one see that you dont put contaminated paper/plastic in for recycling, it is still very confusing as to what we can and cant put in our recycling bins.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Problem is it depends on what your council considers recyclable as ultimately very little needs to go to landfill but the cost of processing the waste can be large compared to the return you get for the recycled materials so they cant be bothered with it and blame the housholder for their failure to comply with the law (unfortunately they are allowed to pass the buck to fulfil their obligations).

 

I am a fan of incineration to produce power but a lot of the radical environmentalist arent but they dont have a solution to the problem, just the mantra that we shouldnt use the stuff. They fly to meetings all over the world at the taxpayers expense to tell each other how noble they are but miss the irony of it all.

 

Green or black plastic comes from somewhere so it can be recycled and reused but the cost of processing makes it unviable to the manufacturer of the items.We need to be telling the supermarkets that we dont want such waste and they wil use alternatives but that needs a concerted effort by the buying public and supermarkets will by necessity have to stock less prepacked perishables so be prepared to queue more or even go to a proper butchers/greengrocers instead. The favourite materials for recycling are the cheapest to buy as raw materials so again a big opportunity is being missed.

 

Green glass is another one, we dont bottle enough wine in the UK to make it worthwhile recycling the green glass. Clear glass is easily contaminated and returnable brown beer bottles are a thing of the past in most breweries as well. Some countries use cheap aqua glass for jars and the like but the British housewife likes clear so it all goes in the bin to be dumped. In Australia you can use glass recycling facilities that crush the glass into sand size particles and this is used to help remediate the Great Barrier Reef. Glass is too reactive to use as building sand but research into using it as road aggregate is being done

 

Another use of rubbish would be to rebuild a lot of the embankments on flood risk rivers. Most of the legislation about landfill comes from the EU because countries like Austria have nowhere to dump theirs and as one size fits all we have to obey the diktat as well. The worst quality agricultural land in Austria is about £25000 an acre whereas in the UK decent farmland will cost you about £7000 an acre despite the greater population density here.

 

There was a report saying that a river in Manchester had the most bits f plastic for any river tested. This research has several flaws, the first one being all of the equipment they used for collecting saples was PLASTIC ad secondly they havent done enough work anywhere lese to give a menaingful comparison. It is like counting the number of disabled people at the paralympics and then assuming that the rest of the world is more disabled because otherwise they would have been competing instead.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

NHDC collects all types of glass, BIFFA then recycles it. Having spent millions on processing equipment for glass I’d be surprised if it gets dumped...

 

Bedfordshire, however, doesn’t take glass...

 

It seems there isn’t really any excuse not to, though...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Each Council is different as to what it will or will not accept for recycling & even then will change their minds about materials every couple of months or so. A more coherent policy that can be maintained is needed.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a look at the work of Professor Chris Cheeseman at imperial College dept of civil engineering, friend of mine since his student days and worked on a lot stuff together.

The road to hell isnt paved with good intentions, it is paved with PFA silceram, etc. Extracting a material from the rubbish doesnt automatically mean that it gets reused or recycled as the same thing, a huge amount gets sent abroad.

 

NHDC collects all types of glass, BIFFA then recycles it. Having spent millions on processing equipment for glass I’d be surprised if it gets dumped...

 

Bedfordshire, however, doesn’t take glass...

 

It seems there isn’t really any excuse not to, though...

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a look at the work of Professor Chris Cheeseman at imperial College dept of civil engineering, friend of mine since his student days and worked on a lot stuff together.

The road to hell isnt paved with good intentions, it is paved with PFA silceram, etc. Extracting a material from the rubbish doesnt automatically mean that it gets reused or recycled as the same thing, a huge amount gets sent abroad.

 

Your friends work is exactly the kind of thing we need. I recycle just as much as I possibly can and I’m proud that I produce less than a carrier bag sized amount of landfill for the fortnightly collection but it frustrates me when obviously recyclable/reusable stuff is land filled..... grr....

Link to post
Share on other sites

saw a news item on the use of plastics instead of bitumen in road surfacing. like adding power station waste to cement and aggregates you still need to use the primary stuff but a good way of reusing some of the plastics that are otherwise non recyclable.

 

More than half of the gypsum used in the plaster industry now comes fro power station sulphur scrubbers so where is that going to come fro when we no longer have coal fired power stations? the asjh that used to be dumped is made into cement and material that was buried as landfill in the 1960's-70's has been dug up and used in cement manufacture so one day people will be mining our old rubbish tips as a source of raw materials.

 

Early computers are a source of gold as so many of the connectors on the chips were gold wire. They are crushed and then treated to recover it. Old telephone exchanges used platinum on the switch contacts and I have spent a couple of days of my life recovering such things from skips outside old excahnges before the powers that be woke up to their waste and got a company to do the recovery for them rather then allowing privarte enterprise.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...