Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sofology Brand New Leather Sofa is Sagging


Marlene30
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2234 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We are looking for advice prior to emailing Sofology.

 

We purchased a 3 seater, 2 seater and 2 leather chairs which were delivered on Friday 9th March 2018.

 

We paid 1,000 deposit and 4,097.00 both by credit card prior to delivery which was initially 5th March but delayed until 9th March due to the weather.

 

This is now 13th March and although we have only sat on the 2 recliners for a period of 12 hours in total they have puddled where we have been sitting. The arms of the sofas are creased and the delivery man told us that they should come out within a 6 week period.

 

Looking for advice on what we should input before emailing them.

 

We did call their Customer Service and were told to email.

Not happy with a 5,097.00 leather sofa set that sags, all still have the tags on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you buy the furniture online or in a store?

 

If you consider that they are defective then you have within the first 30 days under the Consumer Rights Act the short-term right to reject. This means that you should inform the seller of the defect and that you are invoking your rights under the consumer rights act and that you require either a refund or a replacement at your option.

 

I suggest that you do this anyway straightaway because even if you eventually decide not to go down that route, at least you have reserved your position.

 

Can you tell us how you bought the furniture please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay. The important thing is the delivery date which is the date that the contract is complete. You say that it was delivered this month so you are well within 30 days.

 

Then in the letter that I have suggested and also photographs. Don't expect it to be straightforward that you have the consumer rights act on your side if you follow the necessary formalities.

 

Is the furniture which was delivered to you the display models which you saw or are they different? If they are different then did the ones on display in the store show the same defects? If the ones on display are not the ones you received and if they did not display the defects that I suggest you get round to the store and take photographs of them as quickly as possible so that it is possible to see the difference in quality between the ones they are displaying and the ones which apparently have the defect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Begin the process of sending the letter as I have advised. Take the photographs which I have advised and then let us know what responses you get from Sofology. Once you have sent the letter you should expect a response within five days. If you can send them an email as well then you should expect a response within 48 hours.

 

Let us know what happens and we can help you with the next step if it is necessary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know that I received the following response to my email to Sofology: Thank you for your response, I have forwarded this to the Claims Department and asked them to contact you. I took photographs of the puddle marks on the chairs and they have been forwarded to them. Unsure as to whether I can or should attach photographs here or not or whether that is allowed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You haven't dealt with my question as to whether you have taken the display model. You haven't said whether you will go take photographs of the display model

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies, no we did not take the display model. We would not have paid GBP 5,097.00 for a display model. No we have not taken photographs of the display model as there are bound to have been many people who have sat on it since we last saw it in December. As we have several commitments this week it is highly unlikely that we could go to the store until next weekend at the earliest. I am 100% positive, given the cost of the sofa set, that we would have immediately noticed puddle marks on the items on display at the store. Having only sat on the chairs for a couple of hours last night, and having taken photographs about twenty minutes ago today, I am horrified at the puddle marks. I have forwarded the photographs to their Customer Care.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that it is in your interest that you should prioritise getting photographs of the display model. If you know somebody who lives in the area then maybe they will do that for you but you want to make it clear to them that you need decent photographs – several of them.

 

Technically speaking you shouldn't need the photographs – but it will make things much easier and considering the amount of money that is at stake I think I would re-prioritise your week

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...