Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Misleading Advertising cruise company


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2116 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have booked a cabin which company website states bath is included.

 

Since October last year it has been confirmed that these cabins will not have baths.

I have raised this with the company twice but no change to website despite promise it would change 3 weeks ago.

 

Any idea of next steps/compensation for not receiving what they are still advertising today.

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

You should make sure that you get screenshots of everything and keep all correspondence.

 

You seem to be suggesting that all you want is for them to change their website.

 

Have you been on the holiday yet? If not when is it? How much is the holiday and how much would be the holiday without a bathroom.

 

Also, what are the bathroom arrangements in place.

 

Are they advertising other cabins which definitely do have baths?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reply.

As you guess there are 2 issues.

1: They have known since October that these rooms will not have baths so I want website changed for others.

2: Price differential is £2000 so it would be nice to get that also.

 

I have written to their H O in Miami requesting changes and compensation.

In addition they are advertising the rooms on their website as refurbished in 2016 when the ship they bought from P & O has not even started refurbishing in Northern Ireland.

If you wish you could certainly google the particular ship.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking cabin 6088 (Club World Owners Suite) on board Azamara Pursuit as an example. The details on every single website that I can find says that it does have a bathroom and most mention a whirlpool tub.

 

The Azamara Pursuit is (or at least will be) the refitted and renamed Fathom Adonia. The reviews I can find for that ship mention what Fathom just called suites, but from the layout mentioned, these are in the same locations as the Azamara Club World Owners Suites.

 

These are detailed as having Jacuzzi's.

 

 

I can't imagine that the ships new owners have gone to the trouble of removing the suite pods to replace them with new pods that are sans a bath, or even moving/building internal walls to hide the fact that something in the bathroom is missing :lol:. So although baths are not specifically mentioned on the deck plan for the Azamara owners suites, I'd be frankly amazed if they didn't have them.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dragon fly,

Thanks for your input.

We have sailed in these suites on Quest and Journey and currently these have a bath(not marble) AND a separate large shower cubicle and we prefer that.

The new configuration is to return to a completely separate toilet unlike current where there is only a sliding door between bath and WC area.

Not ideal for privacy when using WC.

I have emails etc confirming no bath and simply want Azamara to change website so nobody else gets mislead.

Bath is completely removed and ONLY shower cubicle although it is a decent size.

It is being completely refitted in Belfast.

We only found out by accident.

We also want AZ. to recognise this and some compensation for the misleading advertising still on website despite changes known last October.

i need to know who will take this up with AZ.

 

thanks for input

Edited by brianblessed
additional info
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received reply from ASA and they are getting advert changed.

Will be interesting to see how they get USA based company to change but will keep this thread updated

 

 

 

 

 

Your Complaint: Azamara Club Cruises Ltd’s

 

 

 

Thank you for contacting the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) with your complaint about Azamara Club Cruises Ltd’s advertising.

 

 

 

I understand you raised concerns the ad was misleading as you understand the Club World Owner's Suite on the Azamara Pursuit do not have bath tubs as advertised. We have considered your complaint and think you have a valid point. We’ll therefore instruct the advertiser to amend their advertising to accurately reflect the features of the room.

 

 

 

We shouldn’t need to contact you again. However, once we’ve resolved your complaint, basic information including the advertisers’ name and where the ad appeared will be published on our website, If the advertisers don’t co-operate with us, we may have to think about other ways to resolve your complaint, including conducting a formal investigation that involves the ASA Council. If that happens, we’ll contact you again.

 

 

 

Thank you for taking the time and trouble to write to us. If you’d like some more information about what we do and the action we’ve taken against advertisers who break the code, please have a look on our website.

 

 

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

 

 

Laura Sparks

 

Complaints Executive

 

Direct line 020 7492 2146

 

 

 

Advertising Standards Authority

 

Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn

 

London WC1V 6QT

 

Telephone 020 7492 2222

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi all,

Thought I would now ask further questions.

Azamara maintain they have no responsibility as these are independent companies but surely they are acting exactly as Azamara "agent" i.e .on their behalf

Several online Ta's inc Cruise co, iglu and Thomas cook , cruise1st have this incorrect information (obviously cut/pasted from Azamara site).

Do Azamara have any responsibility to get these corrected or do I have to go after each TA in Turn.

Any advice welcomed or multi complaint to ASA.

 

Thanks for any input

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...