Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot - chasing +£25k unsecured Sainsbury Bank Loan - No CCA produced yet!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2235 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have a debt (approx £25k) that defaulted on Apr 2103 that is being chased by Cabot. I have not made any payments on this since 2013 to either the original lender or Cabot.

 

I have recently requested the CCA from Cabot and they acknowledged the 12 day time limit before temp unenforceable and as they would have to request from the original lender they anticipate not being able to provide it within 12days and hope to have it within 40 days.

 

They said that in unlikely event they cant produce within 40 days they will write to me again.

 

40 days passed around a week ago.

I am unsure what to do next as it does not look like they can provide the CCA and have not written to me as they said they would.

 

What should I do next?

I am tempted to make a silly F&F settlement offer so it is not hanging over me.

 

Any help appreciated.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

you do nothing.

 

whats the debt all about?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

with who and when full details please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so RBS then as Sainsbury bank didn't exist then.

 

puzzled as it must have been above £25k? the initial loan?

then its not covered by CCA and must have been secured?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so RBS then as Sainsbury bank didn't exist then.

 

puzzled as it must have been above £25k? the initial loan?

then its not covered by CCA and must have been secured?

 

All paperwork had Sainsbury's headings etc.. Loan from the Sainsbury website at the time.

 

£25k initial loan (Dec12) over 5 years - Now £27,200.

 

Definitely not secured.

 

£25,000 – is the highest unsecured amount you can borrow

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

good all works out then

 

so why did Sainsburys sell on a loan of that value when they could have crushed you in court?

they only got

 

what went bad ?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had some medical issues which made it difficult to work. It was all a bit odd as the largest amount I owed and they (Sainsburys) were really good, very understanding, no hassle, put it on hold for 6months at a time before selling it on. A lot smaller amounts were chased very aggressively by DMCs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean DCA's

DMC's manage your money for you and should be avoided at all cost when their are free charities out there that do it for nothing!!

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

and have

ZERO legal powers

 

looks like you've been cash cowed blind on the rest and were blindly talking to them over the phone before..

oh well you know better now.

 

ok the loan..

lets hope the CCA doesn't come else you can see cabot taking this all the way..its worth the gamble for a possible +£25k win in court

 

get an sar running to Sainsbury bank now

the more info you can get

the better prepared you will be IF that happens.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

retitled and moved to other institutions forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry yes I did mean DCA.

 

I wouldn't say I was cash cowed on the rest as I didn't pay them a penny (I couldn't, I didn't have anything at the time), and I did speak to them on phone or email but always got agreements confirmed in the post.

 

A couple of examples of F&Fs were 2x10% (MBNA/Capital One), 2x14% (HSBC), 1x24% (RBS) so I don't think I did too bad.

 

I have put a SAR into Sainsburys. I will let you know when I hear from one of them next.

Edited by dx100uk
quote
Link to post
Share on other sites

better at it than what i think you are then.. clever cookie then well done.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...