Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ for approx £500 for solicitors conveyance work - now bailiffs.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2241 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have been issued with a CCJ for an amount I owed a solicitor.

The solicitor didn't complete the work and didn't do as they promised me

when the property sale fell through I didn't receive a bill from them so just never thought about it.

 

I live at an address that was unknown to the solicitor but used to live with a relative.

The relative received a letter from the solicitor saying they wanted money.

I said, fine, but send it back with my new address.

 

I received a letter then at my new address which I have responded to via email, offering to pay a token amount each month until I am back on my feet financially.

 

A CCJ has arrived at my previous address (post is seldom opened hence this problem with unseen letters).

 

I might be moving back there but not sure yet, but if i do or don't I still want to avoid bailiffs at the door as I believe they can force their way in when doing CC enforcement??

 

Would anyone please be able to offer any advice in the event that the solicitor does not accept my offer

- I only offered a few pound a month but happy to have review after a few months.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to clarify WHAT has ACTUALLY gone on so far?

 

you mean you have a CCJ - judgement for claimant?

or

You've received a CLAIMFORM pack from either Salford or Northants bulk court?

 

as for HCEO, i'm not sure where you are reading but they never have forced entry permission on any consumer CCJ.

and the debt appears to be less than the £600 threshold for HCEO being involved in a CCJ anyway...

 

 

I think you are watching too much TV!!

 

please clarify

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I did get a claim form (at an old address) but my relative doesn't open most post and just stashes it behind mircrowave. When the letter arrived she sent it back with my current address on

 

they then wrote to me there and I responded via email, offering a token payment plan for the time being. In the meantime a claim form arrived at previous address which was left unopened. It is only with getting the CCJ letter that was opened that we looked through old post and found claim form. So a default judgement was given.

 

So yes the claimant won by default.

The amount was £340 and is now £560 including all the costs.

 

I did coincidentally chase the claimant for a response to my original email as I received an out of office reply but still nothing a week or so later. The chaser email also resulted in another out of office email, so I forwarded my emails to a colleague mentioned in the message.

 

Later this day I found out about the CCJ.

 

I have seen a couple of 'can't pay we'll take it away' etc and was under the impression that county court bailiffs could force entry, but there's also stuff on the internet which doesn't say otherwise. When I panic i am prone to fearing the worst scenario.

 

I am willing to pay the debt (even though I don't think they did their job properly, but that's a different issue and I should have complained a couple of years ago).

 

However, I am struggling to live on what I have coming in hence my token offer to them. I wonder if they've ignored it because they can just hire bailiffs and bill me for it anyway?

 

Thanks

Edited by dx100uk
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

So yes the claimant won by default. The amount was £340 and is now £560 including all the costs.

 

However, I am struggling to live on what I have coming in hence my token offer to them.I wonder if they've ignored it because they can just hire bailiffs and bill me for it anyway? Thanks

 

I would suggest that you get in touch with the solicitor again this morning to outline your payment proposal. State in your email that if they are not willing to accept your proposal that you will instead be submitting an N245 to the County Court to have the court vary the judgment.

 

PS: What payment proposal did you initially put forward?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What was the debt?

When did you last not pay it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for your replies.

The date on the claim form to old address is 1 Feb.

I have mislaid their letter to me at new address but I think it was something like 5 Feb or thereabouts.

 

The debt was for conveyancing which was incomplete and not done as promised

ie save a heap of time by using existing conveyancing documents from the previous solicitor who took ill during the work.

 

The sale fell through eventually but will never know whether that was not helped by solicitors taking forever to do anything.

Hence I didn't think there was a bill to be paid.

But the bill is only approx a third of what the full bill would have been.

 

The solicitor finally responded to my email and agreed the payment plan I put forward so that's a relief.

 

Is there any way I can get the address of the CCJ changed just in case it has a bad effect on the credit worthiness of other people living at the address it's showing as (my old address).

I've read that mortgage lenders might not lend to anybody associated with the address at this time.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCJ is not against any address

its against YOU.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for your replies.

The date on the claim form to old address is 1 Feb.

I have mislaid their letter to me at new address but I think it was something like 5 Feb or thereabouts.

 

The debt was for conveyancing which was incomplete and not done as promised

ie save a heap of time by using existing conveyancing documents from the previous solicitor who took ill during the work.

 

The sale fell through eventually but will never know whether that was not helped by solicitors taking forever to do anything.

Hence I didn't think there was a bill to be paid.

But the bill is only approx a third of what the full bill would have been.

 

The solicitor finally responded to my email and agreed the payment plan I put forward so that's a relief.

 

Is there any way I can get the address of the CCJ changed just in case it has a bad effect on the credit worthiness of other people living at the address it's showing as (my old address).

I've read that mortgage lenders might not lend to anybody associated with the address at this time.

 

thanks

 

I asked the question regarding the addresses because if they served against your old address when they already had your new address a set-aside may have been an immediate option to give you some breathing space. From the dates you have given it seems the claim was correctly served. I’m open to correction from the experts...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it was correctly served too, just not happy about the address now.

I know it's against me, but this is what I read on one of those money forum thingy's that appear near the top of the page when you enter query about CCJs into google.

 

But thanks for everyone's help and advice, yet again.

 

I will make a donation (small though) when I get my next pension payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It wasn't served correctly if they had your present address.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I live at an address that was unknown to the solicitor but used to live with a relative.

The relative received a letter from the solicitor saying they wanted money.

I said, fine, but send it back with my new address.

 

I received a letter then at my new address which I have responded to via email, offering to pay a token amount each month until I am back on my feet financially.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to CCJ for approx £500 for solicitors conveyance work - now bailiffs.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...