Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Newaday Aqua/Hoist - Settled but incorrectly recorded **DEFAULT REMOVED**


dale1988
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2180 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All looking for some advice about getting a default removed and/or corrected as I believe it was applied incorrectly.

 

I have checked my credit file and hoist applied/maintain a default in November 2014, but the last payment I made to AQUA was in April 2013.

 

I have sent SARs to both Hoist and AQUA, I spoke with Aqua and they have stated that Hoist placed the default, and that they can give me no transaction information as account information over 4-5 years old that was sold on has been purged/removed from their systems.

 

Hoist have yet to respond to the SAR.

 

Few questions:

 

  • If the default was applied over a year late, is it incorrect and can it be removed?
  • If AQUA cannot provide transactional history, how can I ever reclaim the late payment and over limit charges?

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

aqua put the default on upon sale a debt buyer cannot register a default

the account is less than 6yrs old last transaction

if so they MUST hold the data

under the prevention of fraud act

and the data protection act.

 

I suggest you write then a strongly worded LETTER

giving them 14 days to produce the SAR contents or you'll be making a formal complaint to the ICO.

 

is this an halifax aqua card or a newday one?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the swift response, Aqua sent me a response via email from the exec complaints dept stating they no longer had my data on their system and to contact Hoist.

 

The card in question is from New Day.

 

I'll send off another letter referring to my SAR as I've no wish to issue them with another £10.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you state what I quoted above

send it to newday HQ

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Evening,

 

I have had a response from a SAR, the letter states "We are unable to provide any data relating to the closed account in question" end letter...

 

So where do I stand now?

Can I raise a formal complaint to them on the grounds of incorrect default, no evidence one having ever been issued?

(or does the fact it's on my credit file defeat that argument)

Link to post
Share on other sites

id give the ICO a ring now

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I raise a complaint based on the 4th Principle of the DPA, in that they cannot provide any data therefore bringing into question the accuracy of the data they are reporting to CRA? Moreover they cannot surely satisfy CCA compliance given there's no evidence of a default notice ever having been sent?

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Moreover they cannot surely satisfy CCA compliance given there's no evidence of a default notice ever having been sent? "

 

Again as per your other thread there is no legal connection between a CCA Request request and a Default Notice.Two completely separate instruments.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

" Moreover they cannot surely satisfy CCA compliance given there's no evidence of a default notice ever having been sent? "

 

Again as per your other thread there is no legal connection between a CCA Request request and a Default Notice.Two completely separate instruments.

 

Andy

 

The connection I was trying to make was that as they cannot do the following i.e. they have nothing to evidence that it was even served, how can I ascertain that it wasn't invalid?

 

A copy of the default notice must be served on any guarantor [3].

The default notice must meet certain requirements [4] , and must contain specified information, including:

the nature of the alleged breach of the agreement;

if the breach can be remedied, what action is required and the date before which that action should be taken (the date must not be less than 14 days after the notice is served), and

a clear and unambiguous statement of the action the lender intends to take if the breach is not remedied.

 

If they cannot meet the above they fall foul of CCA, and by my understanding also of DPA section 4, or am I clutching at straws?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clutching at straws and mixing your arguments up.....

 

You have.....

 

The agreement...is it valid and can they enforce the agreement...can they disclose the agreement yes or no if not they cant enforce the agreement.

 

The Default Notice...is it valid..legally......was it ever served.....if not they would struggle to enforce an agreement in court without proof one was served and was valid.

 

The DPA and recording of data....was there a breach in the agreement by the debtor...did they serve a valid default notice.....you did not rectify any breach within the prescribed 14 days...then they are entitled to mark your CRAs with the breach which will remain for 6 years from the date of the breach.

 

Keep reading......:-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I finally received a SAR from Newday!

 

The only problem is, it had my address and name on the envelope but the covering letter had my address with another persons name on it! oh and all THEIR account information! whoops, so I now have someone else's SAR with account information, default, address and phone numbers! :)

 

So Mondays phone call should be interesting, I'll be raising some concerns as to where my data has ended up - do we think this will give me a silver bullet to sway them to remove this default, or off to ICO/newspapers I go...

Link to post
Share on other sites

no but a complaint will harm them, ICO needs to be told.

 

newspapers = do not get carried away those days have near gone!

 

 

How your information has been handled

If you’re concerned about how an organisation has handled your information – if the information is wrong, they have lost it or disclosed it to someone else – tell us. do it on line at ICO site

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have some updates,

 

Aqua have come back and apologised for their blunder, offering to reimburse me to send the SAR back to them

- I've reiterated that I would like the default removing as a gesture of good will, which they once refused already

- but have now gone away to reconsider given the above. (on going waiting for FRL).

However I've also now received my SAR.

 

The default notice I believe could be invalid, it states I have to pay by the above dated DD/MM/YYYY, but then the last paragraph states that I must remedy the breach within 28 days of the date of the letter. So there's two entirely different dates by which to remedy, would this be sufficient to get the default removed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan it up to pdf

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

well done!

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Consumer Action Group needs help to cover its expenses.

You could help by making a money contribution to http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

or by downloading our toolbar and using it to search the web instead of your normal search engine:- http://consumeractiongroup.co.uk/cag_plugin.php

Please help.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...