Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Underestimated insurer offer


horizn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2248 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

My car has been hit by another driver. There is no dispute, and other driver has take responsibility. There are damages to my exhaust system and local garage has estimated costs for £894 in total (parts, labour, VAT). Tesco (who is culprit's insurer) offered me £750 because of corrosion prints, but denied to tell if this will cover costs of genuine exhaust + hangers fixing and if parts are new or used. Important thing here are, that in my opinion there is no corrosion, car passed MOT without any advisories in November, as well as genuine exhaust system has chrome tail pipes whilst non genuine hasn't.

This is my first claim in UK, so could anyone please advise what should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why have they offered you money?

The other driver hit you.

They are liable.

The insurance company pick your car up, have it repaired and deliver it back to you.

No "local" garages

If they are asking you to run around and get quotes tell them to Jog on.

That's their job not yours

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why have they offered you money?

The other driver hit you.

They are liable.

The insurance company pick your car up, have it repaired and deliver it back to you.

No "local" garages

If they are asking you to run around and get quotes tell them to Jog on.

That's their job not yours

 

Sorry my bad. They said: Our engineer estimated costs (opinion based on pictures I have sent to them), that this will cost £750. The didn't tell "we can pay you" or something like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you confirm to them in writing exactly the specifications of the repairs that you want done and tell them that this is the only basis upon which you will agree that the matter is settled. You must be very careful to keep everything in writing and to be very clear and detailed

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you confirm to them in writing exactly the specifications of the repairs that you want done and tell them that this is the only basis upon which you will agree that the matter is settled. You must be very careful to keep everything in writing and to be very clear and detailed

 

I would suggest that you confirm to them in writing exactly the specifications of the repairs that you want done and tell them that this is the only basis upon which you will agree that the matter is settled. You must be very careful to keep everything in writing and to be very clear and detailed

I have sent them original estimation made by garage I've been earlier.

They just sent me an email saying:

"

I refer to our telephone conversation where we advised we can pay you £720 towards the repair to your vehicle.

 

There is a garage in Cambridge that can repair the exhaust for this amount. Their details are as follows:

 

[GARAGE DETAILS]

 

This is not for a manufacturer’s part as our engineer has advised they are no longer available from Vauxhall.

 

£720 is the maximum we can pay for the repairs to your vehicle. Any higher costs will unfortunately mean your car will become a Total Loss (write off) as it will no longer be economical to repair.

 

I hope this is helpful.

 

If you have any further queries please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Kind Regards

"

 

 

 

 

 

That is not true. Rear exhaust is still available to buy from Vauxhall, and I didn't ask to replace complete exhaust.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing should realise is that your complaint is against the other driver – are not against the insurer.

 

This business about being "beyond economical repair" is an insurance term and doesn't necessarily affect you. You should be entitled to recover all of your losses from the other driver. I suggest that you start copying the other driver in and also make sure that that eventually if his insurer will not pay the full cost of the losses then you will be suing him in the County Court to make up the difference.

 

This should have the effect of introducing a little bit of conflict between the other driver and the insurer – and that extra bit of pressure is always helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing should realise is that your complaint is against the other driver – are not against the insurer.

 

This business about being "beyond economical repair" is an insurance term and doesn't necessarily affect you. You should be entitled to recover all of your losses from the other driver. I suggest that you start copying the other driver in and also make sure that that eventually if his insurer will not pay the full cost of the losses then you will be suing him in the County Court to make up the difference.

 

This should have the effect of introducing a little bit of conflict between the other driver and the insurer – and that extra bit of pressure is always helpful.

 

 

Thanks guys. Vauxhall has confirmed that exhaust is not in the UK (Signum 2.2direct has never been made here), but it should not take more than 10 days to get it from Germany. I sent a message to Tesco that I disagree, and I am waiting for their move.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why aren't your insurance company fighting this for you?

 

I've only ever had one accident, I was rear ended at traffic lights (stop giggling at the back).

 

I phoned my insurance company and gave them details of the other driver and his insurance.

 

2 days later, my insurance company arranged the collection of my vehicle and dropped off a courtesy car.

 

About 14 days later, my vehicle was returned by their repairer, all repaired with genuine parts.

 

My insurance company then had the claim settled by the other parties insurer.

 

I certainly never had to chase the other parties insurer myself, or arrange my own repairs.

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will probably do it in that way.

 

Because they just sent me that:

 

Thank you for your email.

 

I have raised your concerns with our engineer.

 

He has advised that the corrosion to your exhaust is deep seated and long standing.

This should have been identified at your last MOT.

 

Our engineer was aware it was not for reasons unknown.

 

We have factored in the cost of a complete new exhaust unit as a gesture of goodwill

But due to the pre incident corrosion we are not obliged to do so,

hence why costs for a manufactures part will not be considered.

 

As previously advised we can pay you a cash settlement of £720 towards the cost of your repairs.

If this is not acceptable to you then you may wish to go to your own insurance company to claim.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Last question: Tesco refusues to take my car for repairing and provide a hire car. They only offer me the money. Is it in accordance with law?

I have contacted my insurance company regarding to this, but I don't know how much time will it take.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last question: Tesco refusues to take my car for repairing and provide a hire car. They only offer me the money. Is it in accordance with law?

 

 

Yep, it's called indemnity.

 

Tesco are only liable to compensate for the losses, not physically do anything about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...