Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

I hired an accountant to do my books now being taken to small claim court - timelines


be96erj
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2246 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hired an arbitrator as an ADR between me and my accountant.

 

However it turns out that the contract between me and my accountant does not have a clause for arbitration.

 

The arbitrator took on the job without checking this.

 

He says he doesn't work for free!

 

Given that almost all other professionals would do such a check, as it saves a lot of time

- is there is legal requirement for him to do this check?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you actually mean 'arbitration'? Or do you really mean 'mediation'? They are very different!

 

If both parties agree to submit the case to arbitration or mediation, it doesn't matter whether there is a mediation/arbitration clause or not.

 

The arbitrator/mediator should be paid for work you asked him to do. It can't be very much if the case did not proceed to a mediation/arbitration hearing?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hello,

 

I am being taken to court for non payment of fees. I received a notice of allocation to the small claims track (hearing) in December and it stated that the claimant had till the 8th feb to pay the court fee. On the 7th feb, the claimant wrote to me asking me to settle his costs before he paid the court fee the next day, but I refused.

 

It is now the 22nd and I had heard nothing about this from the court. However the claimant wrote to the court today asking for a postponement for the supply of his evidence (which is in for this Monday) as his mrs has gone into hospital.

 

This is unfair, I have not been made aware that the court case was going ahead (by the court admin). Nor was I told by the claimant that he would definitely be putting in a claim. I am now at a disadvantage as I have not been given adequate time to prepare- compared to the defendant.

 

Can anyone advise if I can get this thrown out as a result of the above, or any other court rules that the court admin and claimants must abide by in terms of informing the defendant within set deadlines?

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hired an accountant to do my books. I believe he has overcharged me. I paid him £600 for his work, but he claims I owe him another £1200. I told him no, but he has taken it this far. I plan to use the consumer protection act, I do not believe he used reasonable skill and care when carrying out his work. I hope I have covered everything!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to General Legal Issues Forum...please continue to post here to your thread.

 

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

All parties must comply with the court directions as per the dates set...only if parties agree between them selves and permission asked of the court would it be considered...otherwise sanctions can be imposed on the the party for none compliance...IE Strike out of the claim/defence.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

All parties must comply with the court directions as per the dates set...only if parties agree between them selves and permission asked of the court would it be considered...otherwise sanctions can be imposed on the the party for none compliance...IE Strike out of the claim/defence.

 

Andy

 

thanks Andy, so what you are saying is that the claimant needs my permission as well to get the extra time? Why on earth would any defendant agree to that?!

 

also is my defence that the court admin have not informed me that the matter has progressed to court or/ and that the claimant has not providing their evidence (but considering I haven't either)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I expect Andy will be back later.

 

Don't you like the earlier advice?

 

HB

 

No its not that. What am I unsure about?

 

1. Even though claimant has missed the deadline, so have I! Will that go against me?

2. Was I meant to have expected to create my evidential case/documents, without even knowing that the claimant had paid the court costs? No one informed me that the defendent had paid court costs as per the n157. Had I been informed, I would have have produced the evidence and sent it off to the court.

3. Is it enough that the claimant has not followed the court's direction, for it to be thrown out?

 

just unsure about it all. Like some others, I get nervous whenever I think about going to court!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Andy, so what you are saying is that the claimant needs my permission as well to get the extra time? Why on earth would any defendant agree to that?!

 

also is my defence that the court admin have not informed me that the matter has progressed to court or/ and that the claimant has not providing their evidence (but considering I haven't either)?

 

I assume you must have completed a DQ Directions questionnaire for the claim to be allocated...for the N157 to be issued (Notice of Allocation) ?

 

That is conformation the claimant wishes to proceed.The claimant does not have to respond to your defence directly..thats later in the process.

No its not that. What am I unsure about?

 

1. Even though claimant has missed the deadline, so have I! Will that go against me? Possibly why have you not complied with the directions by the date stated ?

2. Was I meant to have expected to create my evidential case/documents, without even knowing that the claimant had paid the court costs? Yes the hearing fee is separate to directions and not really your concern No one informed me that the defendant had paid court costs as per the n157. They dont its not your concern but if you ring court and enquire they usually tell you Had I been informed, I would have have produced the evidence and sent it off to the court. See above they are not compelled to tell you that is between the claimant and the court

3. Is it enough that the claimant has not followed the court's direction, for it to be thrown out? Yes it is and so is your defence because neither have you followed directions

 

just unsure about it all. Like some others, I get nervous whenever I think about going to court!

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume you must have completed a DQ Directions questionnaire for the claim to be allocated...for the N157 to be issued (Notice of Allocation) ?

 

That is conformation the claimant wishes to proceed.The claimant does not have to respond to your defence directly..thats later in the process.

 

Andy

 

Thanks for the reply andy.

 

Yes I completed the DQ.

 

Why didn't I comply with the directions? I assumed the court would tell me! I did try calling the court on the last day of payment, but I was holding on for 30 minutes before I was cut off!

 

Why didn't I spend a few hours compiling the evidence not knowing if there was a case? I wanted to save myself a few hours!

 

Having taken this from another post, could you please confirm this is okay?

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

further to the order dated 7th December made by District Judge xxx which gave the following direction to the claimant xxx:

 

Page 2, point 6. Each party must deliver to the other party and to the court office copies of all documents on which that party intends to rely at the hearing no later than 14 days before the hearing.

 

I am sympatheic to the claimaints plight and I wish his wife no ill will, however it must be noted that the claimant had 13 other days in which to put his evidence together. The claimant has failed to comply with the above order and no documentation has been received by me by the deadline set of 22/2/18 at 10am, as the claimant has failed to produce any documentation and therefore broken the terms imposed by the court I am requesting the case be struck out.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why didn't I comply with the directions? I assumed the court would tell me! I did try calling the court on the last day of payment, but I was holding on for 30 minutes before I was cut off!

 

They already have informed you in your Notice of Allocation...hence the N157..the Directions and when both parties must comply by.The directions are not issued on the basis of the claimant paying a hearing fee and if they didnt or are late that the directions would not apply to both parties

 

Why didn't I spend a few hours compiling the evidence not knowing if there was a case? I wanted to save myself a few hours!

 

Well its obvious there is a claim..you submitted a defence in response ...by not complying and not submitting your evidence in support of your defence..you have now put your defence at risk of being struck out as per the instructions stated with in the NoA (N157).

 

Defending a case successfully does not rely on whether the claimant complies with directions and if they dont neither do you.

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

further to the order dated 7th December made by District Judge xxx which gave the following direction to the claimant xxx: Not to both parties ...thats you also ?

 

Page 2, point 6. Each party must deliver to the other party and to the court office copies of all documents on which that party intends to rely at the hearing no later than 14 days before the hearing.

 

Directions work on simultaneous exchange as not to allow one party to have an unfair advantage.

 

 

 

I am sympathetic to the claimants plight and I wish his wife no ill will, however it must be noted that the claimant had 13 other days in which to put his evidence together. The claimant has failed to comply with the above order and no documentation has been received by me by the deadline set of 22/2/18 at 10am, as the claimant has failed to produce any documentation and therefore broken the terms imposed by the court and so have you I am requesting the case be struck out. And the claimant can ask that your defence be struck out also for the same reason

 

 

If only you had complied irrespective of waiting to see if they paid the fee...the above would be slam dunk...because you complied and the claimant failed.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply andy.

 

Yes I completed the DQ.

 

Why didn't I comply with the directions? I assumed the court would tell me! I did try calling the court on the last day of payment, but I was holding on for 30 minutes before I was cut off!

 

Why didn't I spend a few hours compiling the evidence not knowing if there was a case? I wanted to save myself a few hours!

 

Having taken this from another post, could you please confirm this is okay?

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

further to the order dated 7th December made by District Judge xxx which gave the following direction to the claimant xxx:

 

Page 2, point 6. Each party must deliver to the other party and to the court office copies of all documents on which that party intends to rely at the hearing no later than 14 days before the hearing.

 

I am sympatheic to the claimaints plight and I wish his wife no ill will, however it must be noted that the claimant had 13 other days in which to put his evidence together. The claimant has failed to comply with the above order and no documentation has been received by me by the deadline set of 22/2/18 at 10am, as the claimant has failed to produce any documentation and therefore broken the terms imposed by the court I am requesting the case be struck out.

 

Yours Faithfully,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don't you have any evidence to disclose?

 

An extension of time would benefit you too presumably.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on what you said above, this hearing is taking place on 8th March... Upon reading the letter the Court will do one of two things... ignore it.. or adjourn the hearing to another date.

 

My suggestion... get your evidence together and get it to the Court and the other side. As soon as you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...