Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marston bailiffs visit - fined for littering - notice of enforcement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello lovely people

 

Let me quickly explain what is my situation like.

 

About a year ago I got fined for littering (75 quids),

that fine has risen to the stage of notice of enforcement when I have started to dealing with it.

After contacting either collectica and marston (by sending my budget and calling them),a payment plan was refused.

 

Couple of days ago I found final notice saying i need to contact the bailiff on number provided,

I did so but just to be told that full payment need to be made today to avoid further charges and visits.

 

When i was at work yesterday bailiffs paid me a visit,

leaving a little card "notice of intention to search my premises".

 

At this stage Im clueless what else can be done to stop them,

I cant afford to pay this fine (at final notice stage it was 856).

 

Tried to seek help on the phone

the best advice i got was to face my bailiff and try to have a chat with him

then I have read many threads advising against it.

 

One more thing is that property i live in is not mine,

I was a student (recently expelled...) and i live in one of the rooms paying landlord some money to cover the bills.

 

There is no rent agreement whatsoever,

I dont have anything valuable but other people living here may have and Im concerned about bailiffs taking their stuff as I do not think that they still got receipts for their stuff....

 

Thanks for all help in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello lovely people

 

Let me quickly explain what is my situation like.

 

About a year ago I got fined for littering (75 quids), that fine has risen to the stage of notice of enforcment when I have started to dealing with it.

 

After contacting either collectica and marston (by sending my budget and calling them), payment plan was refused.

 

Couple of days ago I found final notice saying i need to contact the bailiff on number provided, I did so but just to be told that full payment need to be made today to avoid further charges and visits.

 

When i was at work yesterday bailiffs paid me a visit, leaving a little card "notice of intention to search my premises".

.

 

I am wondering how a court fine of £75 has escalated to £856 (the bailiff fees would be calculated at £310).

 

Did you receive the initial summons?

 

If so, did you plead guilty or not guilty?

 

You should have received a further two notices from the court....a Notice of Fine/Collection Order and a final notice called a Further Steps Notice. Did you receive these notices?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

After contacting either collectica and marston (by sending my budget and calling them), payment plan was refused.

 

When did you contact Collectica to make a payment proposal?

 

Was this at the Notice of Enforcement stage or after a visit had taken place?

 

How much was the debt at that stage?

 

What payment proposal did you make?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well The only letter i received after notice of enforcement is the final notice few day ago

 

I did not plead guilty, can you please tell me something about it?

 

I havent received any of these letters ( Notice of Fine/Collection Order and a final notice called a Further Steps Notice)

 

I have contacted Collectica at the beginning of January at notice of enforcement stage but to be told that deadline to contact them was two days ago?

 

The debt at the final notice stage was 856 but now as i got next piece of paper called "notice of intention to search..." so I assume it has risen but it is not stated on this card i got.

 

Debt at the stage of notice of enforcement was 621

Link to post
Share on other sites

Around May 2016

 

Actually when I looked up online for the letters such as Further Step Notice, I think i may had this one months ago....

 

Guys is there anything i can do?

 

 

I seem to be running out of options....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well yes, that will happen when you ignore fines.

 

If it is not to rude, can i ask how old you are?

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhas I should explain , but there is a significance to the age of 18 in regard to the MCA and sentencing.(you indicate you had been recently expelled.) But we all know this.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im 19... i live on my own since im 17 got no one who could help...

 

should i let bailiff in and try to beg him not to take anything what is not mine as house i live in is not mine,

nothing what is there is not mine except my clothes etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you cannot pay a fine the options are for the bailiff to apply to the court for further action to be taken, this would be facilitated by a means test.

 

Since this is a fine, committal is a possibility, the test is in regard to ability to pay and if you were guilty of culpable neglect in not doing so.

 

I would contact the CAB, they have specialist advisers in criminal matters.

 

I suspect they will say your need to contact the court and explain your situation.

 

Ask for the enforcement to be suspended and inform them of what you have said here.

 

Since you are employed.

 

i see no reason why the fines officer should not agree to an attachment of earnings.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

The legislation is the here http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/43/contents Part 3

 

As regard none payment of fines, it is the magistrates court act 1980

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Around May 2016

 

Actually when I looked up online for the letters such as Further Step Notice, I think i may had this one months ago....

 

Guys is there anything i can do?

 

It is such a shame that you had not paid more attention to the Further Steps Notice but we are where we are. I would ordinarily given some thought to advising you to consider a Section 14 Statutory Declaration but this route is probably not open to you as you seem to have received the Further Steps Notice 'months ago' ( A Section 14 Stat Dec may only be made within 21 days of a period becoming aware of the conviction.

 

As you appear to have very little in the way of assets, it may be the case that the enforcement agent may realise that the warrant is most unlikely to be paid in full and he will recommend it's return to the court. If that is the case, then the bailiff fees (of £310) will be removed and it is at this stage that you could apply to the court for a 'Means hearing'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed however, if the bailiff returns the warrant with a sum remaining the court may commence committal proceedings in any case, in which case the mans test will be a prerequisite. (this has nothing to do with any application to the bailiff of course).

 

If this happens fees will remain and be recoverable under committal rules.

 

It also appears to me that the search mentioned will be under section 80 of the MCA which also covers arrest.

 

I think it has t be remembered that coiurt bailiffs can do much more than just use schedule 12

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank for all your help, it makes me fell really better that there is someone willing to help...

 

I reckon that means test could be an option.

 

This is the first time Im facing such a complicated problem, could you please let me know how can i apply to be "means tested"?

 

On the other hand,

 

Could you advise me if it is a good idea to talk to bailiff when he knocks on my door?

 

Or is it better just not to contact him in any way?

 

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank for all your help, it makes me fell really better that there is someone willing to help...

 

I reckon that means test could be an option.

 

This is the first time Im facing such a complicated problem, could you please let me know how can i apply to be "means tested"?

 

On the other hand,

 

Could you advise me if it is a good idea to talk to bailiff when he knocks on my door?

 

Or is it better just not to contact him in any way?

 

Thank You

 

You would need to contact the Magistrates court and request a hearing about your means. The court can set the repayments. Neither Marstons or the Council who applied the penalty notice would be interested in setting up longer term repayment.

 

Get the Magistrates court appointment set up and advise Marstons of this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just tell the bailiff what you have said here, say that you are contacting the court and are happy to be means tested by them, since the bailiff will not entertain your previous offer

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I reckon that means test could be an option.

 

This is the first time Im facing such a complicated problem, could you please let me know how can i apply to be "means tested"?

 

Thank You

 

Whilst a warrant is with an enforcement company, it is not at all easy to persuade a court to re-examine your 'means'. I am being brutally honest as I come across queries such as yours on an all too frequent basis.

 

If it is the case that the court had the correct address for you (which is likely to be the case given that you had received the FSN), then the time when 'means testing' would apply would be at the stage when a summons had been issued.

 

When a summons or Single Justice Procedure notice is sent by the court, there will also be an additional form MC100 Means Enquiry Form (MC100) (Statement of Means) attached.

 

If for one reason or another you decide not to complete the MC100 form, then the Fines Officer is allowed by law to assume that your income of £440 per week. Whilst there is provision in law to allow the court to review the level of fine imposed, it is sadly the case that once a warrant of control has been issued, such applications are very difficult indeed to get accepted by the Magistrates Court.

 

PS: Although it is difficult to persuade a court to allow a 'means hearing', that is not to say that you should not at least call the court to discuss the options.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank for all your help, it makes me fell really better that there is someone willing to help...

 

I reckon that means test could be an option.

 

This is the first time Im facing such a complicated problem, could you please let me know how can i apply to be "means tested"?

 

On the other hand,

 

Could you advise me if it is a good idea to talk to bailiff when he knocks on my door?

 

Or is it better just not to contact him in any way?

 

Thank You

 

I think the bailiff has no option but to return the warrant, and as i said earlier any other subsequent action would have to be facilitated by a means test. It seems to me that you were not given the chance to complete the form mentioned because you did not receive the initial summons, so they should really permit in any case.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...