Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Management company accounts. Many duplicate invoices.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1983 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi king12345

 

I note you say you sent the letter to the only address you have and also only email address.

 

Whats the name of the Management Company? (are you sure the above address is their Registered Office Address?)

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

might be an idea to send an official SAR first?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the address i sent it to is the only address for that company.

 

I have physically been there and they have a gigantic sign outside.

 

Same address is recorded at companies house, so no mistakes there.

 

I would like to keep their name confidential until they're exposed, then my plan is to get all the other residents to sue them.

 

Why would i sar them?

 

Account receipts are not my personal data, so they won't be included.

 

Any other reason?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they want to correspond by email them it is not your problem if it is CC'd to all and sundry. A letter to the registered address cannot be rebutted by saying they didnt get it. Tough luck if they have used an accommodation addy that no-one monitors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They never asked me to correspond via email, i just thought that by sending recorded delivery letters and emails it would be very difficult for them to say that they didn't receive anything.

But at the same time i wanna see this in court, so if the receptionist bins the lba, that won't be my problem.

What do you think, letter and email or just letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi king12345

 

Can fully appreciate you want to keep there name private at the moment, you can PM the Site Team the name you never know what we may find.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

On my phone, I can find messages by clicking on User CP at the top of the screen. Then there's a heading under Settings that says Private Messages. If I scroll to the bottom of the page of messages, it says Send new message on one of the buttons. I know not all phones are the same...

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pm done to stu007 with details

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys, they capitulated!

 

A stroppy woman called me from a private number asking for my bank details to make a refund.

I said to her that i repeatedly asked for all communication to be in writing.

 

She lost the plot when i said that i was aware of frauds in which people calling from private numbers would obtain bank details.

I put the phone down on her as she was screaming by this point.

 

Next day i received a letter with a cheque for the entire sum i asked (all undocumented charges and duplicate invoices)

This cheque is for a penny more than i asked,

i was tempted to send them a cheque for a penny just to wind them up.

 

In the letter,

strangely they don't talk about gesture of goodwill,

but the fact that they want to close the matter as they failed to do what they had promised.

 

A couple of days later i also received a "revised" service charge estimate notice for 2018/2019 which is half of the original one they sent at the beginning of April.

Have they learnt from their mistake?

 

I doubt it, most likely they realised that if this had gone to court the judge would have whipped them.

Thanks for all who contributed, i will make a donation to the site.

 

Now,

my next move is to ask again for the last 5 years accounts which they refused to disclose as the regulations only allow leaseholders to ask for previous year accounts documents.

 

Any idea on how i can force their hand?

 

Maybe reporting my findings to the trustees (yes, this company is a registered charity!),

report them to HMRC,

report them to the council who owns half of the properties in the block,

report the accountants who signed the accounts as accurate or all of the above?

 

I asked to organise a leaseholder meeting and they said they won't do it as it's never been done before.

 

Any idea is very welcome.

Cheers!

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

It's another battle.

Half of the properties are owned by the council and the other half are rented out or inhabited by oap and disabled people.

Would be good if the council got involved actively.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can organise a leaseholder meeting and invite the council neighbourhood housing officer along as well.

then, if enough people attend you can set up an association or at least a residents association to act as a point of contact for all of these matters and let the council know that you would like to work with them in ensuring the proper up keep of the estate is maintained and so on.

 

Not the same powers but you will at least gather a few friends and others will be more likely to keep their eyes open and keep the agents on their toes.

 

Look up the Knightsbridge Association and you will see that a rich busybody can hold a lot of sway.

They have some claims that dont actually stand up to scrutiny but the council listens to Mrs Wills because her hubby owns a big slice of BAT

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Caggers,

it,s been over 30 days since I received and cashed their cheque, but they are still ignoring me for the previous years accounts.

 

I initially requested account records for all financial years from 2013 (when I bought the property), but they never sent anything apart the few bits of last year.

The guy from finance I met in September last year, verbally announced that under the Landlord and Tenants Act 1985 they are not obliged to let me inspect any accounts apart from the last one.

 

This is true, but having found gross inconsistencies with last year accounts, how could I convince/force them to disclose those records?

I'm sure there will be some irregularities as the service charge has been a steady £1200/1300 from 2013 and this year 2018/2019 we got the same estimate,

however, after my lba (and the cheque) they sent an amended estimate of £620 saying that there had been a mistake.

 

So, I think they realised that they can't keep charging me any unjustifiable expense and that's a good thing,

But how do I get them on the previous years?

 

One line of thoughts (which is a wild one and possibly a failure from the start) is that if I calculate the percentage they refunded me (roughly 50%) and apply it to previous years, so to have a figure and start a claim.

 

Would that have any basis?

 

Would it force them to disclose the account details or would they simply need to mention the Landlord and Tenants act to get off the hook?

Your input is very much appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

but they will have figures for previous years and that is what you want.

 

Hvae you tired looking at the list of shareholders in the company and see if anyone with a share has interests elsewhere that could be compromised?

look for maiden names of married women and multiples of name variations such as with and without middle names.

 

There used ot be a giant book published that held all the details of the top dogs in local government,

mainly so they could look each other up and offer them jobs without having to apply for them.

 

i dont know if it still exists but worth a trawl if such a thing still exists in some form or other

Look for anyone joining or leaving from/to a related business.

 

You know the type of thing,

Fred works for council and his wife is secretary at local builders who get lots of contracts

 

Sometimes the people involved sit on the same board of trustees for a charity that is involved.

It is a small world at that level.

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi caggers,

not much to update apart from complete silence from the management company despite my weekly emails which are definitely delivered as I get the automated response (we'll come back to you in 5 working days at the latest).

 

Question that I can't find an answer to:

Can I take them to court to force them to disclose the previous years accounts?

 

In an email last year they mentioned that they didn't have to disclose them because of the landlord and tenants act which is correct,

but after finding gross irregularities in last year accounts?

 

Can a judge force them to disclose the documentation?

 

If so, what court would deal with this?

 

County court?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you sent hem a new GDPR SAR?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you sent hem a new GDPR SAR?

 

No, not yet.

But I don't think that accounts would be part of it.

They're right when they say that under the landlord and tenants act they have to provide just a summary, so they won't send me the invoices and other proof of expenditures.

I'm holding on with the sar to see what they reply, eventually they will have to.

Their CEO got an obe for customer care recently and I was tempted to write on his Twitter account my appreciation for ignoring my numerous emails in which he was copied in.

Do you think I can take them to court to force a disclosure?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...