Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LOWELLS Claim Form - old vanquis card debt***Settled F&FS***


rockystar
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1729 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Pers for £900 id let it run even if you lose youve only got to raise £250 in another month to avoid the ccj being reg'd.

 

Or up your f&f to say £650 and thats your lot else i'll take me chance on the day TA

 

See what andy says later

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I went back and offered £650 on Saturday morning and was told I needed to call back Monday morning as no one was available. Called back this morning and they still rejected it. So I'm due in court at 2pm. Feeling sick.

 

All of this is really baffling to me, to be honest. I don't know how to defend myself or what to say or not say. Can anyone give me advice on that? Is there anything I should definitely not say/anything I should?

 

Thanks everyone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You really have to relax and get this into perspective...why you feeling sick ? It really is quite informal...if you win you win..if you lose..at least you gave it go and made them spend more and work harder for their judgment...a claim they never expected you to defend.

 

The Judge will direct and ask you points when your turn arrives...you have your initial defence you have your witness statements with the points raised...simply refer to them and let the judge then ask them to explain your points.

 

It is important that you raise the matter of trying twice to settle this offering F&FS...even given your current financial circumstances..including today's offer...and tell the court they simply flat refused and were not interested.

 

See how the Judge reacts to that.

 

Best of luck...if you lose its a £5 a month.....inform the court you are on benefits.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do not clam up and say nothing...have your say..only 1 chance.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

One quick question: In my conversation on Thursday with Lowells, I was told "It doesn't matter to us whether it takes you 10 or 20 years to pay this". I recorded the conversation. Should I mention this, that I recorded it and the quote? Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No thats irrelevant...just what I have advised above.....courts do not like these type of claims...even more so Claimants who are abusing the system to clog up court time and resources. LOwell will most probably be using in house counsel a the hearing...so thats another chance to rack up a little more profit.

 

Courts always encourage parties to mediate and try to settle..and do not take kindly to parties refusing to even attempt...even if you lose he will be sympathetic and may dismiss and costs for today or restrict their interest requested.

 

If they use a rent a Sol for the hearing he may well approach you before you enter the court room and try to proffer a deal ..unaware that LOwell have already flat refused....if thats the case make your offer again....but no more than £600.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No update ? no further questions ?

 

Would be nice to have a conclusion...good or bad...only courtesy to the poster's who have advised.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello!

 

I thought I'd posted after the court case but it's not here! Really sorry. (

 

You were right Andyorch, they did use a rent a Sol who asked to speak with me before the hearing.

She tried to use the £175 court fees as leverage to get me to sign up to paying £5/month for the rest of my life!

 

When I mentioned what the "recovery executive" from Lowell had said

—that they didn't care if it took me 10 or 20 years to pay this off

—she asked me to leave the room and made a call to Lowells.

When I went back in they had a agreed to settle for the £650 I had previously offered.

So it's settled. Phew!

 

I can't tell you how helpful and supportive I have found this group and I can't thank you all enough.

 

Andyorch, dx100uk, jon8214, Old Cogger—thank you all so much for helping me through this. You've all been fantastic!

 

So sorry my initial reply didn't post. It was a lot more detailed!

 

Thanks again everyone x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the conclusion Rocky.

 

Pleased that you managed to resolve it to your satisfaction and the £650 was in F&FS.

 

I take it they have withdrawn the claim and informed the court settlement was agreed?

 

Thread title updated.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hi again :)

 

Thanks for unlocking the thread.

 

Below is the main part of the letter:

 

'Dear ********

 

Interest Charging on Repayment Option Plan

 

As you will be aware, this account has been sold to Lowell. We are writing to let you know about a matter that has arisen prior to the account being passed to Lowell.

  • We could have done a better job explaining the way interest was charged in relation to your Repayment Option Plan.
  • You are entitled to a refund of £135.23
  • You do not need to do anything – A cheque is enclosed for this amount.

We are writing to you about the recent investigation by the Financial conduct Authority ('FCA') into Repayment Option Plan ('ROP'). We agree with the FCA's conclusion that we did not, during the call where you opted-in to the product, tell you that charges for the Plan attracted interest at you purchase interest rate (though this was disclosed in writing before and after the call). We could have done more to ensure you understood the interest charges on ROP, for which we apologise.

 

You are entitled to a refund of all interest charged on ROP. Your are also entitled to 8% simple interest for any period your account would otherwise have been in credit. We have agreed the method of calculating the refund =with the FCA (under its statutory powers.)

 

A breakdown of the amount being refunded is below...' 

 

So, this threw me a bit and I wanted to get your take on it. Is this anything to do with PPI? Should I just cash it or press for more information?

 

After all that angst and hassle, this!!!

 

Thank you :)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ppi rop refund

cash in

nothing more you need to do.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...