Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell claimform - old Lloyds overdraft debt***Claim Struck Out ***


notodebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1912 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Looking for some quick advice on a court claim from Lowell dated 5th Feb who have a Lloyds overdraft debt sold to them in 2015 although it was around 2013 that Lloyds kept adding more and more charges and fees etc.

 

The POC is as follows :

Author Document

Debt assigned on 24/11/15 by Lloyds banking group PLC and the claimant claims

1. 3595.98

2.Statutory interest persuant to section 69 of the county courts act ( 1984) at a rate of 8% per annum from 24/11/2015 to 02/02/18

287.68 and thereafter at a daily rate of 0.79 to date of judgement or sooner payment

Ref ****************** ( there ref number here )

 

I will be defending fully

but was thinking of using CPR31.14 but the claim does not mention any documentation.

 

Also is it worth sending a SAR request today to help my defence.

 

As stated I know there are multiple charges on the account,

I also do not recall receiving and NOA or documents asking me to bring the account up to date in a set timescale.

 

Also as a side not I am currently self employed under contract work until the end of Feb so if it does go to court can I still receive a CCJ for being self employed or possibly unemployed if I do not get any contract work in the coming months ..

 

Thanks...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 235
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi ...

 

If you could read the following link and confirm whether you received the New Pre Action Protocol letter prior to this claim being issued.?

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?481827-The-Pre-Action-Protocol-for-Debt-Claims-is-made-by-the-Master-of-the-Rolls-as-Head-of-Civil-Justice.-1st-Oct-2017

 

Then read the following link and copy and paste the Q,s and your responses back here to provide a history of the debt then we have it all in one post to enable the best advice on how to proceed.

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

 

get mcol done

time is running out

just send our current account CPR 31:14 as is

no need to change anything

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick assistance..AOS done , CRP 31.14 sent to solicitors yesterday to be signed for..printed signature on form...

 

Irrelevant to us until you complete the link in post#2 notodebt.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells

 

claim from dated 5th Feb

 

 

What is the claim for –

 

The poc is as follows :

Author Document

Debt assigned on 24/11/15 by Lloyds banking group PLC and the claimant claims

1. 3595.98

2.Statutory interest persuant to section 69 of the county courts act ( 1984) at a rate of 8% per annum from 24/11/2015 to 02/02/18

287.68 and thereafter at a daily rate of 0.79 to date of judgement or sooner payment

Ref ****************** ( their ref number here )

 

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? - NO

 

What is the value of the claim? - £4015 inc court costs and solicitors fees

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Bank Overdraft

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? - After 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. - Assigned and by the debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No ! Did not get any notification

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? - To my knowledge no

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? - NO

 

Why did you cease payments? - Lloyds kept adding fees and charges they also kept honouring Direct debits despite me telling them not to which increased the balance, I am sure i may have had letters upholding my complaints after raising the DD issue

What was the date of your last payment? - Not sure around 2012/2013

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? - Yes for fees , chargers and not cancelling Direct debits

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? - Yes I did communicate financial problems but no debt management plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this ALL the poc says..

 

Author Document

Debt assigned on 24/11/15 by Lloyds banking group PLC and the claimant claims

1. 3595.98

2.Statutory interest persuant to section 69 of the county courts act ( 1984) at a rate of 8% per annum from 24/11/2015 to 02/02/18

287.68 and thereafter at a daily rate of 0.79 to date of judgement or sooner payment

Ref ****************** ( their ref number here )

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats it word for word !

 

One thing I initially thought is the line debt assigned..don't believe I got a NOA ...

 

You can also see they are adding interest as well..

 

I think initally the debt was £2600 made up of charges , but Lowell have been adding on since

Link to post
Share on other sites

well no they aren't adding interest

they are hoping to get a default judgement which would not be seen by any human, and that slips through

its for the JUDGE to allow 8% and not over several years either, typically only one year is allowed

 

I would assume as they always do that they've lefy this until just before SB date

or what they think is the SB date, to gain max int on it.

 

go ring LLOyds ask last payment date please

they have 24hs phone banking

or do you still have online access

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sort of

its a bit complex the historic web between HBOS/TSB/LLoyds group

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep getting passed from pillar to post by Halifax but not being deterred.

 

On a side note

I have received a letter today from Lowell on another debt ( Vanquis card ) for £710 ..

.I sent them a SAR request for this sametime I sent the 31.14 to their solicitors ,

guess what I have been offered a 40% discount....what a surprise !

This is another one that is full of charges etc but that is for another forum...

 

Spoke to Halifax and they cannot get into account for balance or last payment but will send out statements for within the next 5 working days.

 

What they did confirm is the account was closed March 2014.

I know that between 2012 to 2014 no payments were made by me

so in liklelyhood it is coming up to the SB period which is possibly why Lowell are going for it now.

 

Also checking paperwork I did the pre litigation letter from Lowells solicitors....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still awaiting any response from Lowells for CPR request ( is the timescale 7 days ) ?

Found pre action letter from Lowell solicitors dated 24/12/17 it has the prescribed terms but does not include any documents or statements sent with it

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no timescale on CPR.....

 

what you want are those statements!!

 

just don't ever miss your defence filing date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

an overdraft?

aside from the last payment (have you checked that), when was the o/d taken out

 

Hi..

Awaiting documents for last payment...O/D was taken out in 2009

 

an overdraft?

aside from the last payment (have you checked that), when was the o/d taken out

 

Need to check figures but taken out on 2009 to 2012 when I lost job and then spiralled out of control with fees , chargers and honouring D/D's up to £3500 ..was left like that until 2015 and closed then passed to Lowell...

 

an overdraft?

aside from the last payment (have you checked that), when was the o/d taken out

 

Oh also not a signed in branch O/D but done over the phone with Halifax cust services so no signed docs to accept terms and conditions etc..

Link to post
Share on other sites

i was asking, as if it was after 2011 then the s61b cca act would apply. it wouldn't require signing though, just terms furnished at the time. then up to the court.

when was the last payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay got a letter today from Lowell not relating to this but to 2 other debts they have purchased that I sent a SAR request for sametime as the SAR 31.14.

 

Apparently they are only sending me data since they purchased the accounts and not from previously as I will need to contact the original creditor for this.

 

Surely that is for them to either have all the previous paperwork or down to them to get the information from the OC if Lowell are the supposed owners ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay got a letter today from Lowell not relating to this but to 2 other debts they have purchased that I sent a SAR request for sametime as the SAR 31.14. Apparently they are only sending me data since they purchased the accounts and not from previously as I will need to contact the original creditor for this. Surely that is for them to either have all the previous paperwork or down to them to get the information from the OC if Lowell are the supposed owners ?

 

If its of no connection to this thread...please do not post it ..it complicates the thread.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

start a new thread on it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...