Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

THE GRIMSBY AND CLEETHORPES STOVE CENTRE LTD - Retailer Refusing Refund - *** Resolved ***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2116 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hoping someone can help.

 

We called into a local fire/stove shop as we wished to have our gas fire removed and a wood burner installed.

Chap came round, checked everything and advised due to space we could only have an inset wood burner.

 

He showed us no physical examples just a couple of pictures from the web.

He provided us with an esitamate with his terms stating payment of half upon ordering and the remaining half five days before installation, the fitter to be paid directly upon completion as they are sub contractors. We duly paid and arranged a fitting date of last Friday.

 

The fitter removed our gas fire and found a live electrical socket embedded in the chimney behind it, and advised he could not fit the wood burner whilst it was still there which was quite understandable.

 

A builder working next door came and had a look and arranged for an electrician to come and make the socket safe, which he did and he advised that he had no idea where the wires were coming from as they were encased in concrete in the chimney breast. The fitter said he was still not prepared to fit the wood burner as it stands.

 

We rang the shop and the guy originally said the manufacturer would take the item back less a hundred quid, we felt we were entitled to a full refund because it can't be fitted due to health and safety issue.

 

We agreed to have the hundred quid knocked off the refund and advised that we would look to recoup that amount later,

the guy in the shop promptly hung up on us..

 

we emailed and asked him to process the refund and he emailed back threatening to charge us for storage of the wood burner and said it was totally fit for purpose and that we would come round and chase the wall so the wires could be pushed back, we declined as he is not a qualified electrician but we can't understand why he suddenly changed track and went on the defensive.

 

We paid by credit card, despite him wanting us to pay by Bank transfer so I guess we can down that route if he doesn't give us our refund?

 

Also because we did not physically see the wood burner before it was brought in by the filters we think we might be protected by the Consumer Rights Act which says you have fourteen days from receipt of the goods to return it because the law states you should be allowed to see the product or experience it before making a final decision.

 

We don't really want to go down the legal, route if we can help it but we can't afford to write off £2K

 

Anyone offer any advice on whether we are protected or not?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i wonder why he wanted you to pay by bank transfer.... :) he knows that by CC there are rules. Bank transfer, once the money is in the account, you have zero comeback

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, he;s obviously trying to avoid his responsibilities. And legal route? Just go to the CC and start a chargeback.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

But will they do it?

 

Effectively there is nothing wrong with the goods apart from they can't fit them unless we have electrical works carried out which will be costly and which we can't afford,

 

he has the woodburner and our money but could say we can have the woodburner back

(obviously we don't want it back as it's no use to us)

 

so were hoping that because we hadn't seen the item before it was delivered we would be covered by the consumer contract regulations

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could use an ADR

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh thanks. Its silly i never noticed that.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

We spoke to a solicitor yesterday who says we are covered by the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2015 and are entitled to a full refund.

 

We have once again emailed the guy,

advising he has to give us a full refund within 14 days of our cancelling in writing which we did on 31st Jan,

 

solicitor says if he doesn't refund by 14th Feb he will take up on our behalf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need a solicitor. You can do it yourself for free

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant reclaim solicitors costs so you would be better off staring a claim yourself.

We can advise what the procedure is and what to put in the claim.

 

It is usual for the sller to pay up once the claim form hits their doormat as they know that you arent going to let the matter slide.

 

You have been a member long enough to work out how to navigate the forum and to pick out the relevant bits

so from now on you dont use email,

you write proper letters and send them to the business address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We also put a couple of our emails in the post to him, and sent via signed for post,

he has signed for them so can't say he hasn't received them..

 

solicitor would just send a letter and if he still doesn't pay up we would go through small claims court,

 

I will come back as and when I need help with the forms etc.

 

Thanks for the advice so far

Link to post
Share on other sites

but at the moment you are throwing good money after bad.

recorded post, solicitors etc.

 

you have over 1300 posting so you should know a little about how things work by now or at least know where to look.

 

Just trying to speed things up and reduce your costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This bloke is still ignoring us, he won't reply to anything we send and hasn't issued refund.

 

Come Wednesday when the 14 days are up for issuing refund as per Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013..

.can we just issue small claims court procedure?

 

Been reading about pre action protocol but not sure if that is applicable in this case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have sent a letter telling them what you want and when you expect it by and warned them that you will take court action to recover the amount owed plus expenses then yes, just get on with it.

 

For the CRA it is the date you raised the matter that is important, not the date of your last action.

 

your solicitor should have made this clear both to you and in his letter to the company.

 

It may be that he didnt knowing very well that he would then generate further business by doing things slowly

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've not used solicitor for anything more than a free phone call...

.we have letter before small claims all typed up and ready to send if he doesn't comply with refund by end of 14 day period,

 

we will give him a couple of extra days after then as I'm in hospital next week..

 

.so we send it off, give him 28 days to respond and if nothing whack in the small clams court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes If you threaten to do it, make sure the second the timeframe elapses, you file that claim. Be professional with it. Don't feel you have to be kind to them. Get the claim in, and you want nothing short of a refund as a result.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

why give him an extra couple of days? It makes you look like you arent aht bothered.

 

We've not used solicitor for anything more than a free phone call...

.we have letter before small claims all typed up and ready to send if he doesn't comply with refund by end of 14 day period,

 

we will give him a couple of extra days after then as I'm in hospital next week..

 

.so we send it off, give him 28 days to respond and if nothing whack in the small clams court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...