Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

THE GRIMSBY AND CLEETHORPES STOVE CENTRE LTD - Retailer Refusing Refund - *** Resolved ***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2121 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hoping someone can help.

 

We called into a local fire/stove shop as we wished to have our gas fire removed and a wood burner installed.

Chap came round, checked everything and advised due to space we could only have an inset wood burner.

 

He showed us no physical examples just a couple of pictures from the web.

He provided us with an esitamate with his terms stating payment of half upon ordering and the remaining half five days before installation, the fitter to be paid directly upon completion as they are sub contractors. We duly paid and arranged a fitting date of last Friday.

 

The fitter removed our gas fire and found a live electrical socket embedded in the chimney behind it, and advised he could not fit the wood burner whilst it was still there which was quite understandable.

 

A builder working next door came and had a look and arranged for an electrician to come and make the socket safe, which he did and he advised that he had no idea where the wires were coming from as they were encased in concrete in the chimney breast. The fitter said he was still not prepared to fit the wood burner as it stands.

 

We rang the shop and the guy originally said the manufacturer would take the item back less a hundred quid, we felt we were entitled to a full refund because it can't be fitted due to health and safety issue.

 

We agreed to have the hundred quid knocked off the refund and advised that we would look to recoup that amount later,

the guy in the shop promptly hung up on us..

 

we emailed and asked him to process the refund and he emailed back threatening to charge us for storage of the wood burner and said it was totally fit for purpose and that we would come round and chase the wall so the wires could be pushed back, we declined as he is not a qualified electrician but we can't understand why he suddenly changed track and went on the defensive.

 

We paid by credit card, despite him wanting us to pay by Bank transfer so I guess we can down that route if he doesn't give us our refund?

 

Also because we did not physically see the wood burner before it was brought in by the filters we think we might be protected by the Consumer Rights Act which says you have fourteen days from receipt of the goods to return it because the law states you should be allowed to see the product or experience it before making a final decision.

 

We don't really want to go down the legal, route if we can help it but we can't afford to write off £2K

 

Anyone offer any advice on whether we are protected or not?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i wonder why he wanted you to pay by bank transfer.... :) he knows that by CC there are rules. Bank transfer, once the money is in the account, you have zero comeback

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, he;s obviously trying to avoid his responsibilities. And legal route? Just go to the CC and start a chargeback.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

But will they do it?

 

Effectively there is nothing wrong with the goods apart from they can't fit them unless we have electrical works carried out which will be costly and which we can't afford,

 

he has the woodburner and our money but could say we can have the woodburner back

(obviously we don't want it back as it's no use to us)

 

so were hoping that because we hadn't seen the item before it was delivered we would be covered by the consumer contract regulations

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could use an ADR

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahh thanks. Its silly i never noticed that.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

We spoke to a solicitor yesterday who says we are covered by the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2015 and are entitled to a full refund.

 

We have once again emailed the guy,

advising he has to give us a full refund within 14 days of our cancelling in writing which we did on 31st Jan,

 

solicitor says if he doesn't refund by 14th Feb he will take up on our behalf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need a solicitor. You can do it yourself for free

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cant reclaim solicitors costs so you would be better off staring a claim yourself.

We can advise what the procedure is and what to put in the claim.

 

It is usual for the sller to pay up once the claim form hits their doormat as they know that you arent going to let the matter slide.

 

You have been a member long enough to work out how to navigate the forum and to pick out the relevant bits

so from now on you dont use email,

you write proper letters and send them to the business address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We also put a couple of our emails in the post to him, and sent via signed for post,

he has signed for them so can't say he hasn't received them..

 

solicitor would just send a letter and if he still doesn't pay up we would go through small claims court,

 

I will come back as and when I need help with the forms etc.

 

Thanks for the advice so far

Link to post
Share on other sites

but at the moment you are throwing good money after bad.

recorded post, solicitors etc.

 

you have over 1300 posting so you should know a little about how things work by now or at least know where to look.

 

Just trying to speed things up and reduce your costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This bloke is still ignoring us, he won't reply to anything we send and hasn't issued refund.

 

Come Wednesday when the 14 days are up for issuing refund as per Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013..

.can we just issue small claims court procedure?

 

Been reading about pre action protocol but not sure if that is applicable in this case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have sent a letter telling them what you want and when you expect it by and warned them that you will take court action to recover the amount owed plus expenses then yes, just get on with it.

 

For the CRA it is the date you raised the matter that is important, not the date of your last action.

 

your solicitor should have made this clear both to you and in his letter to the company.

 

It may be that he didnt knowing very well that he would then generate further business by doing things slowly

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've not used solicitor for anything more than a free phone call...

.we have letter before small claims all typed up and ready to send if he doesn't comply with refund by end of 14 day period,

 

we will give him a couple of extra days after then as I'm in hospital next week..

 

.so we send it off, give him 28 days to respond and if nothing whack in the small clams court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes If you threaten to do it, make sure the second the timeframe elapses, you file that claim. Be professional with it. Don't feel you have to be kind to them. Get the claim in, and you want nothing short of a refund as a result.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

why give him an extra couple of days? It makes you look like you arent aht bothered.

 

We've not used solicitor for anything more than a free phone call...

.we have letter before small claims all typed up and ready to send if he doesn't comply with refund by end of 14 day period,

 

we will give him a couple of extra days after then as I'm in hospital next week..

 

.so we send it off, give him 28 days to respond and if nothing whack in the small clams court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...