Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Credit/Debit Card Payment Charges post Jan 2018


Heckler
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2267 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On the 13th of Jan 2018, changes came into effect to stop companies adding on fees for people using a card to pay with.

 

I was under the impression that this was now illegal.

 

The other day I went into a Premier Stores franchise and bought a few items, came to less than £7... But when I went to pay, the price had jumped to £7.17... I queried my it had gone up and was told there was a 50p charge for using a card.

 

I pointed out that this was now illegal, but they were adamant they were allowed to do it. I told them under no circumstances was I accepting it and that they'd lost my business... and left.

 

I then left feedback/reviews online to warn others.

 

But what 'exactly' is and isn't allowed now?

 

I read that one of those takeaway delivery apps that used to charge extra for card payments as now simply extended the charge to 'ALL' types of payments, and that's supposedly legal as they're branding it a delivery charge rather than a 'card fee'.

 

If the shop is acting illegally, where do I report it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant charge for using a card but of course they dont have to accept one.

 

I used to refuse payments of under £8 by card but never charged people for processing payments etc.

You didnt buy anything so you cant report them

 

The food delivery people use a flat fee regardless so that is legal.

 

As for trashing them online because you cant be asked to carry a tenner in cash when you go shopping,

would it be acceptable for them call you names online if they told you to go away for trying to pay by card?

 

I suspect that they dont know they couldnt charge you

but when suitably informed they wont be sympathetic to anyone who tried to pay by card for a small amount again.

 

I used to have to pay either 2% or 60p for taking a card payment

so 50p isnt exactly ripping you off.

 

The big companies like airlines used to whack a charge on to dissuade peopel from using credit cards to pay and thus avoiding having to keep to their obligations under the Consumer Credit Act

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the one hand you say..

you say they can't do it..

. and then say I shouldn't let other people know what they are doing is illegal..

. and then claim that you 'suspect' they simply didn't know...

after I'd told them that it wasn't allowed as of the 13th Jan.

. after it's been all over the news, TV/print/online..

 

you are so knowledgeable about them that you can make such an assumption whilst flip flopping back and forth like you did...

and to top it all...

try to make out it's ALL MY FAULT for not having cash on me.

 

[sarcasm]

Well forgive me for not knowing better,

forgive me for not living up to your super standards...

 

I suppose I should have travelled all the way to my nearest ATM at the supermarket,

just so I could travel all the way back to my corner shop to get a few things that would have been cheaper to buy at the supermarket.

[/sarcasm]

 

If you must reply... please try to be consistent next time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

What the mfor aajority of the public forget is that retailers do get charged for every transaction they accepts. Some are on percentages and some are a fixed fee and some on a mix of the two. On top of that there is usually a monthly fee to pay for the rental of the equipment, then is also added the cost of what they call PCI Compliance - it all adds up. Some retailers are paying huge amounts for this - yes I am talking in the hundreds of pounds, who knows what the multiples are paying.

 

I used to charge 5% of every transaction by card but dropped that well over a year ago. I only got to know about the changes from a Social Media site that has a retailers section, the trade press has glossed over it very quickly and nothing at all from Government or those who will be enforcing the new changes. There are many that are still charging and like you customers are voting with their feet and going elsewhere.

 

We now see customers wanting to buy a newspaper or a bag of crisps or packet of chewing gum and wanting to pay by card - seemingly the multiples allow it so Joe Public thinks the small shopkeeper will as well. My minimum spend is now £5 - I don't think that is unreasonable, I don't allow tobacco sales by card as high value item & low profit results in not being able to cover the processing charge. My customers know the rules and are happy - but it is some 12 miles to the next one.

 

For yourself then there is nothing to stop you reporting the shop concerned even though you ended up walking out. Only contact telling them of the new law will correct them. You say it was a Premier Store, then also complain to Premier, Booker who are their Cash & Carry and strangely enough Tesco who are merging with Booker.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...