Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
    • Npower and Scottish Power and others have always had regulations that require them to treat customers fairly - the threads here and my experiences demonstrate that those regs are little more than useless.   Even Octopus recently spent month after month saying they needed to increase my monthly payments despite my credit balance slowly going up TWICE I had to reset it online back to prior payment as they unilaterally increased it unilaterally. Raised formal complaint and they than said i was paying too much and reduced the payment, again without my agreement, although that time at least they told me they were doing it.   .. and Octopus has been one of the better ones.    
    • Thank you. You left all your personal details showing on the invoice, but I've removed them. From Googling it seems the free parking is limited to one hour.  You stayed two.  There is no point appealing, you did overstay.  That's apart from the fact the private parking companies are just interested in £££££ and never accept appeals. We have other Iceland cases, Iceland as a company refuse to have these invoices cancelled. So it's up to you. Pay £51 and the matter goes away. Or refuse to pay.  Horizon very rarely do court.  We would support you all the way. 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot Lloyds Overdraft


Diceman321
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2275 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I had a current account with Lloyds, opened 2002.

 

I stopped servicing this account in 2015, with an overdraft of £1,900.

The account was assigned to Cabot 9 months ago.

 

When I was notified of this assignment I wrote to Cabot to verify that they had the rights of the account and were in a position to request payment.

 

I requested from Cabot copies of the original agreement I would have signed when it was set up, the terms and conditions, a full statement of the account, the notice of assignment and the default notice.

 

After a long wait they have written back stating:

 

"we contacted Lloyds for further information.

Unfortunately, they have been unable to provide a copy of the agreement as when your account was opened, they were not obligated to retain this information"

 

they include a few statements from 2014 to present

there was no default notice

they included a copy of the assignment notice

 

Without the original agreement and terms how am I able to proceed

, I would like to determine the charges applied etc and understand the terms

 

Can I request the statements from day one of the account, or should I SAR Lloyds?

I don't recall receiving a default notice, so I would like to see a copy of this too.

 

What is the best form of reply here?

Cabot end their letter:

"I believe the evidence provided verifies the outstanding balance. "

 

does it?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they haven't supplied a Default notice etc then i think that this will derail any claim.

As its an overdraft debt - They dont have to supply a CCA because there isnt one as such... However I have a better idea - Can you PDF everything and upload it?

 

Remove all personal info / bar-codes etc.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will upload when back from work.

 

I had researched regarding CCA for overdrafts etc and think I'm there with them not being covered.

 

What I am looking for though are the terms and conditions I signed to originally for 2 main reasons.

 

Firstly I want to determine any unfair charges,

what the rate of interest was etc and

secondly If I was issued a default notice,

what terms did I default on?

 

It must state somewhere a reference to why they are defaulting the account against the original terms - or does it?

 

Also the lack of statements annoyed me, as I am unable to look into where all the charges arose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely right, Just a statement doesnt prove a lot.

The T&Cs form a legally binding contract for services and they should have a copy of those...

 

Otherwise good luck to them trying to enforce this... But before you get too hopeful - Let the other guys come in and offer their advice.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once a current account/ overdraft is terminated and recalled...the creditor must serve a demand/termination Notice (Notice served under Sections 76(1) and 98(1) of the CCA1974)

 

Also take a look at ....

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/61B

 

and

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1974/39/section/127/enacted

 

 

Is it showing on your credit reference files as defaulted?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ever sign anything?

You indicate you might have?

 

Yes SAR lloyds

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

I cant remember if I did sign anything, not being evasive! just really cant recall

 

I will SAR Lloyds to determine what is available on this account

 

Do I need to inform Cabot I am doing this, as I know it takes 40 days. They currently have put my account on hold for 21 days, I'd prefer to keep the days going as long as possible!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

On hold from what ? ...ignore Carboot from here on.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ideally you shouldn't have wrote or contacted them at all...gives them delusions of grandeur and you believing that they are actually a creditor....still whats done is done now and given that you have asked all the pertinent questions...puts them on notice that you actually know more about this process then they do and that they wont be steamrollering you.

 

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...