Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Jacamo & Fashion World Accounts


nicolee2931
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Trying to cut a long story short as much as possible.

Hubby has 2 accounts with Jacamo and Fashion World (both trading as JD Williams)

In September 2017, he entered into a payment arrangement due to illness which will ultimately end up killing him.

Payment arrangement kept to next payment not due until February, or so we thought.

This morning he gets a letter from Lowell informing him both accounts have been sold to them.

He has spoken to Jacamo and raised a complaint with them and they have confirmed they have not issued him with a default notice as they are understanding of his illness, but a business decision was made to sell the accounts.

Now I know I am going to get shot down on this

but he made contact with Lowell to see what the hell was going on.

He passed them no information which could identify him,

he wanted to know why they are in possession of two sold accounts for which Default Notices were never issued.

JD Williams (Jacamo and Fashion World) admitted they didn't issue Default Notices, the telephone call for both conversations was recorded.

 my question is what now?

My husband has 2 debts which have been sold on without Default Notices.

And inside the letters from Lowell, is confirmation from each company the debts have been sold.

He is worried scared of what is going to happen, and while he knows these companies are powerless.

It won't stop them taking him to court or trying to destroy his credit file which is in quite good health..

.. It clearly states under the T & C they will issue a notice under the Consumer Credit Act.

Any advice most welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they would be powerless if they were acting as debt collectors,

they arent,

they now own the debt and are likely to take action to recover the money.

 

Why, because they paid about 6p in the pound for the debt so it is worth their while suing for the whole amount.

 

What you need to do is work out what the actual real debt is after all incorrectly added fees and charges have been taken off the amount they say has been accrued.

 

Also check to see if interest has been added to these fees as they are not part of a credit agreement so dont accrue interest.

 

Now, the company that owes you this will be JDW so reclaiming these fees etc will absolutely negate the small amount of money they have received for selling the debt on.

 

Howeve, it is more likely that these amounts can be removed from the total that Lowells will ask for and thus reduce their unholy gains.

 

As for failing to default,

this is a fairly new tactic they employ to try and kid people that the Statute Barred clock hasnt started yet so they can trash your credit record for longer and take their time taking civil action if it has been a while since you make any payment.

 

You will need to do a SAR to JDW for all of their records so you can do your sums before Lowells kick off.

 

So tell us how much is owed,

when the origianl agreement was signed and anything else relevant such as what was agreed in the payment agreement,

how long that was kept to etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

well its happened

 

probably the best they've not registered defaults as now lowells cant either.

use our debt collection library

and send them the one that states £x for xxmts.

 

then just do it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly the same thing happened to me today as well with a JD Williams account ( SimplyBe )

 

I had an agreement to pay monthly and it says on my letter they sold my account in December without a default notice to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He has pulled the CEO's email from CEOemail and sent a damning complaint email to the CEO of JDW, threatening to take his complaint to the FOS and passing on detailed evidence of his health condition which is a death sentence hanging over his head.

He said death can't come soon enough so Lowell get nothing, but said he will fight the good fight as long as he is here.

The bizarre thing was he didn't break his payment arrangement,

there is a payment due in 10 days time on the Jacamo account which the Direct Debit is still active on his online account,

and worse still his Fashion World account they took a Direct Debit on the day they sold his account,

the Directs Debit is still setup on that account also,

as is the Direct Debit's are still active on the 2 account which were not sold.

As he has 4 accounts in total, 2 which were sold and 2 remain in house.

So now in the mean time send JDW a SAR for all his accounts,

he might as well do it now,

he has 4 accounts,

should he send for all 4 accounts and if so will it be £10 for each account or £10 for all 4?

One interesting thing to note JDW could see his Withheld Number when he called into the call centre,

they have never had our new landline number which we changed just before xmas,

we have permanent 141 one the line and he tested it on his mobile before calling them and it came up Withheld on his mobile,

the agent said they could see his number when he refused to confirm his number,

the cheeky so and so even read it back on a call which was being recorded,

he said the number was absolutely never to be recorded or passed onto Lowell.

So what now,

should he argue the case with Lowell over the lack of a Default Notice keeping it all in writing,

he has it in a recorded call with JDW, one was never issued,

is it worth transcribing the whole 29 minute call in case he has his day in court?

Can a case even proceed with no Default Notice when an account has been sold, which I believe Lowell can't default him either?

And in the mean time wait for the SAR to come back and then raise hell with JDW with both a fee claim and a complaint to the FOS?

After seeing the post from @CC48 above this one, I bet there is a fair few more accounts JDW have just decided to sell onto Lowell.

Also is it also worth having a notice added to the Credit Reference Agencies that no default notice was ever issued,

and send them the transcript of the recorded call and evidence from the SAR that no default was ever issued just in case on is attempted to be registered later on.

Also is it worth asking for a signed copy of the Credit Agreement, or not worth it in this case?

@ericsbrother

The amount for the Jacamo account is £2414 & Fashion World £1347.

To be honest he is up to date on all his arrangements, even the ones that got sold on.

On the £2414 he pays £40.00 per month, and the £1347 he pays £20.00 per month.

He did miss Nov' 2017, but he was rushed into emergency surgery on his neck around the time the payment was due and I took my eye of the ball while he was in ICU kept in a coma to maintain his airway.

But the 1st of December 2017 I paid £120.00 on his online account which was more than enough to cover the missed payment and then they went on to take payment on the 5th December by Direct Debit of £80.00 in addition to the £120.00 I paid on the 1st December 2017,

no doubt the £80.00 consisted of the previous month of November 2017 which was missed and the current month of December 2017.

Then they pull a trick like this after depriving me of £200 3 weeks before xmas while hubby is in a coma for 5 weeks due to complications,

the consultants said if we are going to loose him its best he don't know how ill he is, hence the reason for keeping him in the coma.

Honestly I am so angry with what they have done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you really need to tell him to calm down

theres no need to do any of that.....

so what they've sold the account

why is he SO bothered about 4 stupid cat account

they are lowlife credit.

its not as if you'll have to pay it when he;s gone.............mmmm

ONE sar is all that's needed PS

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He even said that himself, he knows time is short, unless there is some miracle I can only hope for.

I think he want's some fun with these lowlife's, he is more bothered about me and the harassment and lifetime of eternity they will hound our mailbox with once he has gone.

I suppose he is at least doing some good while he is here, if not himself, but for others that these lowlifes lay on the vulnerable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cancel the DD's now.

As the debts have bee sold on JDW are getting money they are not owed.

Also,

may seem callous but do you know the difference between a deceased person's estate and their chattels?

estate,

is money in bank,

shares and stocks,

property (not shared property where it is owned as a tenency in common)

certain works of art, certain " collections" (such as a number of vintage cars or a collection of rare books for example)

and jewellery of significance.

Chattels is

all his furniture,

clothing,

car and anything else he owns that is not covered by the "collections" bit of his estate

so a coin collection worth say £15k and gathered over time is not part of his estate.

Liability for Capital Gians Tax wil determine whether an item is a chattel or not

so buy a Ming vase a year ago for £50k and if it doubles in value then yes it is estate.

No debtor has call on anything that is not valued as part of his estate

there are certain bills that claim precedence,

you pay for your own funeral for example.

If he has no estate after working out the above then they cant get a penny.

Any estate worth less than £350k goes to you automatically

so again they dont get a penny if they try to claim after his death.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I get what you mean,

there is nothing creditors could lay claim to.

We don't own property,

well we did at one point but the house was sold to the local authority under mortgage rescue about 3 years ago.

As my husbands illness meant he had to give up work we decided keeping the mortgage going was impossible,

so the local authority own the property now.

But he has sent the complaint across to the Chief Executive now see await what happens,

he has has also sent a SAR off to see what comes back.

What is the process of claiming the fees back and can they can be claimed back legally,

is there a spreadsheet what works out the interest which has been added to the accounts?

There probably isn't a lot of fees as he never missed payments, only the change in his health caused a blip.

Are they entitled to actually refund the fees to me or offset them on the accounts.

However in a call my husband made to JDW this morning there is an awful lot of customers who have had their account off loaded to Lowell,

JDW tried to assure me I wasn't the only one,

the indication was there is 1000s of poorly performing accounts which have been offloaded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes there is,

you need to read a bunch of other threads in this section to get an idea of what you have been charged.

 

You will need to calculate how much in fees and also how much interest has been added and then let them know you are after them for the money.

 

They are likely to deduct them from any outstanding monies as they are entitled to

but make sure you work out all of the fees etc for all accounts

and get them presented separately rather than bundle them together

 

as any monies refundable on sold on accounts cant generally be added to a different debt

unless you agree to it and TBH I wouldnt as they then lose twice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well an update,

JDW have now sent the other 2 accounts out of the 4 which hubby had with JDW off to Lowell,

even after a complaint going in prior and a promise the 2 in house accounts would not be sold.

 

He has sent off a SAR to JDW for the 4 accounts and see what comes back,

 

I'm guessing he puts in a claim for the charges to wipe out any amounts they have sold the amounts on cheaply to bring as much pain as possible to JDW.

 

I'm guessing JDW owe hubby rather than passing this amount on to Lowell,

as Lowell are claiming they own the debt outright,

so in that sense hubby gets the money back in his pocket from JDW.

 

Also anyone finding themselves in my hubby's position be absolutely prepared to have all your accounts sold to Lowell, even if any arrangement you have with JDW to kept up to date.

They are sending up to date accounts with arrangements on them to Lowell claiming its a business decision.

 

Its wrong and there is something definitely not above board going on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its all quite std practice sadly.

 

I doubt you'll see any of the charges money and nor will lowells

but the spreadsheets correctly done

will most certainly make lowells think twice before issuing a claimform if they are that way minded

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

Hubby has an account with Jacamo.

He was on a payment arrangement for ill health, had heart attack and other issues since. However none of the arrangements were met due to his deteriorating health.

Today he gets an email stating due to a system error in calculating interest rates more interest has been added to his account.

Is this even legal considering he is on a payment arrangement and ill with deteriorating health. Jacamo  say it’s an internal error in their systems which caused the rate error.

Any advice on this, I’ll attach the email later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Jacamo & Fashion World Accounts

ive merged an old thread but i see this must be another jacamo account from 5yrs ago. 

sounds like a std letter sent to everyone.

why are you getting so upset?

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...