Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, you made a bad mistake by outing yourself as the driver. But that's not fatal.  It's a case of one argument unfortunately down, but lots of other arguments still standing.  Chiefly that this is a scam site with an invisible line separating two car parks in order to entrap motorists. 1.  As LFI says, send a SAR to MET so you can get your hands on their original invoice.  Invest in a 2nd class stamp and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office. 2.  About six months ago, when the tsunami of cases at this site started, lots of Caggers contacted the CEO of Starbucks  https://www.ceoemail.com/s.php?id=ceo-82463&c=Starbucks UK-General Manager  Starbucks then contacted EuroGarages which seems to be another company in their group, and which runs the Stansted branch, and which got the invoice withdrawn.  However, after one, two, 10, 20 of these cases Starbucks seemed to get fed up.  However, it's only an e-mail, and surely worth a shot.  Lay it on thick about being a regular Starbucks customer but on this occasion you found the branch closed, and it is completely unfair to be charged £100 for briefly stopping in a car park while trying to use Starbucks. The main point here though is that MET are very, very wary of starting court cases for this site.  If they don't do court there's no reason to pay them.
    • Thanks jk2054, you were indeed correct. I've received the court order requesting documents and the witness statement etc. which I will read through and begin to compile shortly.
    • Find out what these WhatsApp scams are and what to do if you receive a message from a scammerView the full article
    • You need to send Met an SAR and they will send you the original PCN .. However all their PCNs appear to be the same and as the car parks are on airport land the keeper is not liable for the debt. Only the driver is responsible. But there are other considerations which can be enough for you to win. Poorly lit signage; scam site, it's a penalty; as well as problems with the contract. So you have a lot of things going for you as well as Met are not keen to take well defended cases to Court.  
    • The brand, which runs 216 shops as well as franchised stores, is looking at ways to save cash.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MMF chasing QQ debt subject to iressponsible lending claim from dec 2010


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2274 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear all

 

I wonder if you can help?

 

Last week I received a letter from our friends at MMF chasing a quick quid loan and threatening a CCJ.

This made me take my head out of the sand and decide to do something

– but I fear I might be too late

 

I had 15 loans from QQ from December 2010 to the last one in (which was an extension of an existing loan taken out in Dec 2011) in March 2012, which I didn’t pay to break the cycle.

 

I have paid over £3k in interest.

I took a loan out every month which was an increase or an extension.

At the time they lent to me, whilst I was on a good salary,

due to mental health issues I was in total financial disarray.

 

I was on a DMP with debts of approx. £38k,

I had 8 defaults and also debts with Wonga (written off) and Payday UK (paid in full).

 

QQ never reported a default to any CRA

(although they did send me a default notice y email in june 2012)

to be honest with sorting out all the other messes I conveniently forgot about them until MMF kindly got in touch.

 

further to the MMF letter I wrote to QQ to complain about IL and had a standard template reply saying its past 6 years so we don’t have to do anything go to the FOS.

 

I also wrote to MMF informing them I didn’t acknowledge the debt,

that the account was in dispute and asking for the loan agreement.

They have agreed to put the account on hold for 30 days.

 

So my questions are

 

1) is it worth going to the FOS after all this time?

I have evidence of my financial state at the time as kept a couple of old Credit reports,

I could get bank statements (not sure if they will help my case due to my salary and borrowing) but cant do this until pay day,

 

2) have I now acknowledged the debt by putting the claim in thus resetting the clock

 

3) as I paid to extend the loan in march 2012 does this count as a new loan (asking as this would be under the 6 year mark?)

 

4) would it be worth just offering MMF a low FFS figure I really do want to avoid a CCJ or default or do they have to wait for the FOS complaint

 

I have worked so hard for the last 10 years to pull myself out of this mess and am nearly at the finishing line ,

I really don’t want to give up without a fight.

TBH i dont want any cash back just acknowledgement that the last loan is unenforceable

Link to post
Share on other sites

moved to the MMF forum.

 

pers i'd ignore them

and no they cant put a default on your file if the one placed by QQ has already reached 6yrs and the loan is no longer showing.

 

which account number are MMF claiming you owe money on..

and when did you take it out?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for taking the time to reply, it is very much appreciated:-)

 

just to clarify a default was never entered at any CRA for this debt but i did receive a notice of default.

 

I think they are referring to a QQ loan originally taken out in jan 12 which i continually rolled forward last payment was made in March 12, but the idiots have sent me the Credit agreement for a previous loan so i am waiting for a bank statement to prove that it was paid but i am guessing they will catch up!!

 

The last correspondence with QQ was in July 2012 when i tried to set up a payment plan - so that would, i guess, be the date from which the statute barred clock starts as the debt was acknowledge in writing - albeit email

 

is it worth going to the FOS for irresponsible lending and should i challenge QQ for the knock back as the last loan WAS taken out with in the 6 year period?

 

MMF have agreed to put my account on hold for 30 days

 

like i said i paid the loan back and well over £3k in interest - i really dont want to pay those cockroaches any more (sorry if i have offended any cockroaches)

Link to post
Share on other sites

email does not reset SB.

 

i'd go with an IRL claim to QQ

and ignore the powerless MMF

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...