Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • OK, thanks, I won't wait for them. On a side note, some of the posts on here are a bit frustrating, I read through five pages or so of someone going through the court process rooting for them as I'm reading, then nothing, not heard of again. Left here wondering what the outcome was, lol!
    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because there was still £69 owing, I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle. However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account ......... has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northern Ireland parking ticket restricted zone with BB


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2276 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was attending my daughter's graduation at the beginning of December.

I parked in a street, in an unfamiliar area.

There were cars parked on both sides of the street

 

I only got parked because another driver was leaving a "space" as I was arriving.

I have a blue badge and as the space was double yellow lines I thought I had touched lucky.

I turned and walked away in the opposite direction.

 

When I returned to my vehicle, it was dark.

Parked cars had mostly cleared and I was able to turn and leave the street the same way as I had arrived.

It was only the following day I found I had received a parking ticket.

And I was angry to see that it was for parking in a street with restricted parking.

 

I looked my ticket up online and the parking attendant had taken photos, showing the position of the car and a nice big closeup of a restricted parking sign.

I had seen no such sign when I parked there.

 

I drove down to the same street,

parked in the same spot and proceeded to look for this big sign.

The only sign I could see was one for "No Drinking In Public" on the opposite side of the street.

 

I eventually found the sign, which turned out to be about 6" x 4" and was on a lamppost about 200 yards from where I parked.

Also the angle it was fixed at made it completely unreadable.

 

I took photos and challenged the ticket on the grounds that the restrictions were not clearly displayed.

I was pretty certain the ticket would be cancelled based on the evidence.

 

Then this morning I received a letter from Parking Enforcement to say the challenge had been rejected as the parking restrictions were clearly signed and lined(?).

 

I am adamant that the restrictions were not clearly posted, plus the fact that the only space available was on yellow lines means I wouldn't have been able to see any "lined" restricted areas.

 

I am of a mind to fight this, but would like the views from members who have experience of doing so.

 

I live in Northern Ireland so I'm not sure if different laws and rules apply here to the rest of the UK.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What’s the name of the street, and town, upon which you parked? As quoted in your PCN...

 

Its Fitzwilliam Street in Belfast. I entered the street from University Road and left on foot towards University Road. There were no signs between the entrance to Fitzwilliam Street and where I parked. The first one (the one I found) was probably 150 yards* from the entrance.

 

*I made a mistake in my original post. The distance from my car to the sign was around 100 yards, not 200 yards as I said originally.

 

I was parked there from around 3.40pm to 4.10pm. The Parking attendant "observed" my car for 5 minutes, from 3.59pm to 4.04pm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that what Disgruntled meant is that if a CPZ is clearly signposted at each gateway (entry point) then they don't need to have signs on each and every street. A driver should already be aware that they are entering (or within) a CPZ.

 

If that is the case, then you might be fighting a loosing battle if your case hinges on there not being a sign where you parked. :|

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you actually checked the Blue Badge Parking Rules?

 

Rights and responsibilities of Blue Badge holders: https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/articles/rights-and-responsibilities-blue-badge-holders

 

Have a read of the webpage but specifically read 'Blue Badge parking rules' onwards,

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I've read the rules.

I don't see anything in them which is pertinent to my case.

let me state the specifics as far as the blue badge rules do apply:

 

I was parked on double yellow lines, just before they became a single yellow line.

I did not park within 15 metres of a junction.

My valid blue badge was clearly displayed so it could be read from outside the car.

 

In other words,

I was,

to the best of my knowledge,

parked legally.

 

The ticket does not allude to a breach of blue badge rules in any way, shape or form.

The only sticking point is that of parking restrictions.

That is why the ticket was issued.

 

I say the restrictions were not clearly displayed;

ie the sign is too small,

and placed where it cannot clearly be seen from certain positions.

 

They say that the restrictions are clearly signed and lined.

That point is the issue I am asking for advice on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that what Disgruntled meant is that if a CPZ is clearly signposted at each gateway (entry point) then they don't need to have signs on each and every street. A driver should already be aware that they are entering (or within) a CPZ.

 

If that is the case, then you might be fighting a loosing battle if your case hinges on there not being a sign where you parked. :|

 

Exactly...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly...

I'm totally confused now.

what you're saying is,

there is one sign on University Road where it joins Bradbury Place,

another at the Malone Road/Stranmillis Road intersection and

another on the Lisburn Road at the start of the streets which connect to University Road,

stating that there is no uparking at all in that area?

 

Because there is definitely on-street parking on Elmwood Avenue,

which runs parallel to Fitzwilliam Street.

 

there would need to be a sign at each end of Elmwood Avenue stating the different rules which apply to the rest of the area, and I'm pretty sure there isn't.

 

I'm also pretty sure there are no signs stating that the area is a permanent no parking zone, at the start of every entrance to the QUB area.

 

This is like squeezing blood from a stone.

 

Why?

I've given all the relevant information.

Including what the sign said.

Haven't you read the previous posts?

 

To recap.

I parked on double yellow lines with my blue badge displayed.

I got a ticket for parking in a restricted parking area.

 

The sign displaying the restrictions (no parking at any time)

was around 100 yards further on from where I was parked

about 6 inches by 4 inches

and positioned in such a way that it was difficult to see,

and impossible to read,

from where my car was parked.

 

I challenged it as I believe the restrictions were not sufficiently displayed

my challenge was rejected on the basis that the restrictions were adequately displayed and lined.

 

There were no other signs in the area,

either at the entrance to the street

or at the "boundaries" if the surrounding area,

stating it was a no parking zone.

 

If you feel that you can give me advice on what I should do,

but feel additional information to what I have already stated is needed, feel free to ask.

 

please don't ask vague or irrelevant questions,

or make inflammatory comments.

It is very unhelpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I've read the rules.

I don't see anything in them which is pertinent to my case.

let me state the specifics as far as the blue badge rules do apply:

 

I was parked on double yellow lines, just before they became a single yellow line.

I did not park within 15 metres of a junction.

My valid blue badge was clearly displayed so it could be read from outside the car.

 

In other words,

I was,

to the best of my knowledge,

parked legally.

 

The ticket does not allude to a breach of blue badge rules in any way, shape or form.

The only sticking point is that of parking restrictions.

That is why the ticket was issued.

 

I say the restrictions were not clearly displayed;

ie the sign is too small,

and placed where it cannot clearly be seen from certain positions.

 

They say that the restrictions are clearly signed and lined.

That point is the issue I am asking for advice on.

 

Why come for advice and don't bother listening??

If your badge was displayed as you say then it doesn't matter if the signs were there or not as you had a blue badge anyway.

You were not from what you say in a disabled bay

so why would the ticket mention the badge?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're mistaken.

 

At one time DYL's used to also have "no parking at any time" signs.

But nowadays DYL's are always 24/7 and the signs are not required,

but councils often have fail to remove the old redundant signs.

 

So if you were on DYL,

with a BB and clock and the time set on the clock was less than 3 hours before the pcn was issued, you have a BB exemption.

 

The pcn will not mention the BB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...