Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Please provide advice on the following situation: I rented out my property to four students for 16 months until March 2024. Initially, the property was in very good condition, but now it needs extensive renovation. This includes redoing the bathroom, replacing the kitchen, removing wallpaper, and redecorating due to significant mould growth. The tenants also left their furniture on the grass, which is owned by the local authority. As a landlord, I've met all legal requirements. It seems the damage was caused by poor ventilation—windows were always closed, and heating wasn't used. There was also a bathroom leak fixed by reapplying silicone. I tried to claim insurance, but it was denied, citing tenant behaviour as the cause by looking at the photos, which isn't covered. The deposit barely covers the repair costs, or else I'll have to pursue money claims, which I've never done before and am unsure about its legal complications or costs. Any thoughts on this?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PRAC/BW claimform - old PaydayUK PDL Debt - ***Claim Dismissed***


minionherder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2242 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I've been posting on a different site about this but help seems to have dried up.

 

I'm keeping things vague as I don't want to tip their hand.

 

Last year I complained about IL to PDUK. Extremely close to this time, probably passing in the post was a claim form from BW about a £100 loan outstanding from PDUK.

 

I informed them it was in dispute, sent off the usual CCA request and CPR naming agreement, default notice and assignment.

 

My defense stated the account was in dispute and that BW had not supplied docs or CCA.

 

No response from BW.

 

DQs were exchanged, I reminded them no docs had been sent.

 

During this time PDUK took a very long time to turn down my complaint, I escalated it to FOS.

 

Mediation comes and goes as no docs had been produced.

 

BW finally supply reconstituted Agreement 3 months after CCA request. Still no Default or assignment.

 

Hearing date set, BW pay court fee.

 

Im now preparing witness statement, still awaiting FOS outcome they are waiting for docs from OC.

 

Not sure how to proceed with witness statement. I know how to write it but am not sure what legal arguments I should flesh out.

 

Anyone know mistakes BW may make and or arguments I can use on my WS?

 

Also what mistakes may have been made on their reconstituted agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need to hide details

we've dealt with hundreds of PDL Claimforms here.

there should be a WS in one of them

 

I've moved you to our legals forum.

if you use our top search CAG box of the red toolbar

 

PDL Witness statement

 

you should find the threads that have examples

what date is your hearing please?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you've got to send your WS to the court 14 days prior and a copy to the claimant sols too.

 

have a go we'll help

there are lots of PDL claimform WS's here to help you.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they sent a statement (I call this the BW Legal Special) saying you borrowed more than you actually did?

Any chance you can post up docs minus personal details...

 

If you are currently complaining to the FOS then theoretically it should stop court action under the new PAP... They are viewed as a ADR service.

But either way, lets get you sorted...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This claim was entered in september before the new PAP came into force.

 

Also I'm away for work till Friday was going to put together docs, scans and WS on Friday/weekend then post recorded Monday. I'll upload relevent docs then which ones do you want to see?

Edited by minionherder
Addition
Link to post
Share on other sites

IF you can PDF everything you have and remove all personal info... LEts see if we can help

Sorry for being a bit dopey earlier - I read posts but i dont read posts if you get what i mean :lol:

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

read upload one multipage pdf please only

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still sorting docs.

 

Just noticed, my CCA request was sent to PRAC, my CPR request sent to BW.

 

Only BW have sent Agreement, no reply from PRAC does that mean PRAC have still failed to produce CCA or does BW sending one count?

 

Added agreement and statement, I note daily interest applied several times in one day.

 

Also letter from them after I informed them it was in dispute.

Doc post (2 files merged).pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have the agreement.

get working on your WS

you were supposed to be doing that this w/end??

 

its due tomorrow.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

More or less complete just tweaking it before printing and sending it later today.

 

xxxxxx = date to be added

 

2. The payday loan account in question was, and still is, in dispute. The defendant has an ongoing complaint regarding irresponsible lending with the Financial ombudsman and the original creditor. The claimant has been aware of this complaint within the first week of the claim. They have been unreasonable in pushing this matter through the court system before the complaint is resolved. Evidence docs 1-3

 

3. The Defendant denies monies are owed to the Claimant as alleged in the Particulars of Claim and does not recognise the assertion that any debt has been legally assigned to the Claimant and as such the Claimant is put to the strictest of proof. The claimant has stated the debt was ‘assigned to the claimant on xxxxxxx yet has failed to provide a copy of the Legal Assignment a copy of the Deed of Assignment and copy of how the Defendant was served with the aforementioned. A copy of the Defendants CPR 31.1.4 request and tracking number is included in evidence. Docs 4-5

 

4. A request was made to PRAC financial for a copy of the Agreement (Contract) under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79). They have never responded to this request both within and outside the prescribed period. Eventually BW Legal the claimants solicitors supplied an unsigned reconstituted copy, 3 months late. Evidence docs 5-6.

 

5. The amount claimed is vague and unsupported by an accurate statement of account, the defendant requested a statement of account via the aforementioned CPR request. Although a list of interest and payments was supplied they have yet to supply an accurate detailed breakdown of how the total has been reached. Evidence doc 4.

 

6. The Claimant has at this time only supplied a reconstituted agreement unsigned by the original creditor or the defendant. The defendant has yet to see an enforceable original copy as was requested in the CPR request in evidence. It is likely the original was an electronic agreement and the defendant acknowledges that an original copy is difficult to supply in these circumstances, however it should be easy for the claimant to show logs of activity and proof of electronic signature as evidence of the existence of the electronic original copy. doc 4.

 

7. The claimant has ignored or refused requests to show a copy of the Default Notice mentioned in their claim. Further, they have not provided proof of how this was served upon the Defendant. The aforementioned CPR request is in evidence doc 4

 

8. Throughout this claim the claimant has acted unreasonably and by their actions forced the defendant into a course of action that can only result in a court hearing. They withheld the reconstituted credit agreement until after mediation thus forcing the defendant to miss any chance of mediation due to missing documentation. They failed to supply the documents requested in the CPR request of xxxxxxx again hampering both the defendants defense and mediation. Even as recently as late November 2017 despite being made aware of the ongoing complaint with the financial ombudsman they are still continuing with the claim. Their actions have forced the inexperienced defendant to prepare for and appear in court with limited information. Even while preparing this witness statement the defendant is unaware of whether the Financial ombudsman will rule in their favor or not, this again leaves them perplexed as to how to effectively defend the case any further. Evidence doc 7

 

9. I believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update.

 

I sent off witness and evidence pack, (on time).

 

They sent them as well (4 days late)

 

Their witness statement says lots about the usual stuff entering agreement etc. plus about 3 pages attempting to undermine my defence as its a defense posted on the internet (They quote the CAG website).

 

They state my ongoing complaint has little to do with the loan they are claiming despite my complaint covering all loans with PDUK. Also they mention about me asking for the docs (CPR 31.14) but state they do not help my case so are unsure why I asked for them.

 

They have supplied another copy of the reconstituted agreement no signature from PDUK, no signature space for me.

 

They supplied the statement of account (with mistakes).

 

They supplied a printout of a computer system that apparently shows default then also a blank template letter of a default notice. (Its full of boxes stating enter name here, company logo here)

 

They supplied a copy of assignment letters (no proof they were posted)

 

They supplied a copy of a confidential letter between me and PDUK, PDUKs final decision on my complaint.

 

Still no reply from FO regarding the complaint. (Im now assuming PDUK are stalling to drag it beyond the hearing)

 

They state they will not attend court but will have advocate there.

 

What does this mean? I'm assuming they will pay a random solicitor to appear for them.

(If they win does this cost get added to the claim?)

 

Any tips on how to progress welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its live with the FOS BEFORE it went to court then it should have stopped any legal action... MEh

 

Post up all docs minus personal info... Lets see what they have...

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan everything up to one multipage PDF please

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the lack of copy of DN a defence or more of a technicality?

 

So far I can rip their statement of account to bits as it has mistakes, point out they failed the CCA in time, the 31.14 request in time (theoretically still not fulfilled without a default notice) and point out the agreement is just a reconstituted copy.

 

Then I have the fact the entire PDUK account is in dispute with FOS although in their statement they state the loan in question was not loaned irresponsibly and should form part of the dispute.

 

I'm putting together notes for the hearing, what else can I include? Are there any other issues with the docs they have produced?

Link to post
Share on other sites

time failure are immaterial

the DN is a template

and is bogroll

that fatal to their claim.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does their statement look like this? And have errors like double interest application ?

 

The header just says payday uk account statement in their evidence docs and does have interest errors.

 

I have however had one just like that sent out to me seperately from them.

Edited by minionherder
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

They state they will not attend court but will have advocate there.

 

What does this mean? I'm assuming they will pay a random solicitor to appear for them.

(If they win does this cost get added to the claim?)

 

Any tips on how to progress welcome.

 

Anyone know about the above?

 

Still no reply from FOS really taking the mick here.

Edited by minionherder
missed bit
Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably from ELMS Legal or someone like that...

FOS take ages but should have stopped legal action if done BEFORE they issued Court Forms...

 

When it comes to the statement... Point it out to the judge...

When was this loan from?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a similar claim going through against PDUK / BW Legal in respect of a loan from 2012,

 

I had filed an initial holding defence but intend to file an amended defence to include inaffordability / lack of checks and overall usurious interest rates.

 

Are there any templates available for this ?

 

Thanks in advance.

Edited by Yorkmackem
FUrther detail
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...