Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DPD lost parcel in transit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

First time posting here but really need some advice.

I'm a small business and use DPD regularly for shopping within the UK.

 

I dispatched an order to the EU on DPD classic which has been subsequently lost on transit (also dpd staff have mentioned it being stolen - but nothing has been done about this).

 

A search was conducted and nothing found so they've closed it today and offered £8.78 in liability. The value of the item was declared as £2000 on the customs form so was taken aback with their offer.

 

The t&cs for this specific shipping option states anything lost and damaged within transit would be covered by the supplier with the maximum value being the amount on the declaration so I expected to be reimbursed in full or as close to as possible.

 

My customer is expecting a full refund for all costs which is higher than the declaration so at present I'm likely out of pocket by a vast sum of money.

 

DPD have stated they've closed the case and will offer their liability but no further. I would like to appeal this decision due to their mis leading t&cs.

 

Does anyone have any suggestions or advice on what's the best way to go around this?

 

Thanks in advance,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course if the courier is not carried out their contractual obligations correctly by failing to deliver the parcel then they should be 100% liable – at least to the value of the declaration.

 

You say you're going to be out of pocket anyway. What is the actual value of the parcel? And also why is there the discrepancy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

The full refund total is near £2500 owed to my customer which includes reimbursement of the product plus reimbursing of my services and any fees incurred during this time. So the settlement figure is more than the items value.

 

How is it possible to prove the value liability if they are offering such a low sum? I've already reiterated their t&cs in my letters of complaint which has fallen on deaf ears as only been contacted via telephone and only by my local depot rather than higher management who was also contacted from myself.

 

Just feel like this case hasn't and isn't being taken seriously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You obviously need to take control of the situation. Start off by reading our customer services guide and implementing the advice there. Do not make any more phone calls or accept any more phone calls until you are recording them. Once you have installed a recorder then you should make some phone calls to see what kind of things they say and get the varying stories that they will give you.

 

Please can you put up the TNCs in question – in PDF format or else link to them. Did you have a "insurance"? I don't particularly understand how they appear to have agreed to cover you to the extent of the declaration – if they haven't charges some insurance for this. (As it happens, my view is that these insurances are unnecessary anyway – but that's another matter)

 

Have you written to them at all?

 

Can you tell us what the item is please. I don't really understand what you mean when you refer to "services and any fees…"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice, I'll all of this on board.

 

In relation to your questions, please find answers below;

 

dpd.co.uk/classic_terms_and_conditions.jsp

 

Yes I do have business insurance. The parcel itself was sent on a standard DPD classic rate, I've been told verbally by DPD that since I have t&cs I should be fine in relation to full liability but this has not been recieved in writing at any stage.

 

I've contacted them directly every day via phone and lastly by email to both my local depot and the ceo. This has not been responded to via DPD - only recieved phonecallls.

 

The parcel in question contained a handbag. I offer a restoration service which is where the services and fees come from.

 

Thanks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link to the T&Cs but this takes me to the entire contract. It would be helpful if you could link to the particular passage in question or else copy it here

 

Where I suggest that you install your call recorder and start getting a bit of verifiable/confirmable information down and then we can go somewhere.

 

I don't understand why DPD apparently telling you that because of your business insurance it will be fine and then they limit their liability to 8 quid.

 

I suggest that you lay it all out to them in a formal letter and send it recorded delivery. While you are waiting for a response start recording calls to gather all the information you can.

 

After about 7 or 10 days we can see what you've got and we can decide where to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I've pasted the paragraphs I believe show dpd to be liable for loss/damage to the declaration value.

 

8. LIABILITY FOR LOSS AND DAMAGE AND DELAY

 

8.1 Subject to the provisions of this Section 8 and Sections 5.3, 9, 10 and 11, the Service Provider shall be liable for any physical loss of, or physical damage to, goods during Transit (as defined in Section 6), and storage, except as described in the specific provisions published on the website of the Service Provider at .dpd.com and except to the extent that such loss or damage has arisen from or consists of

 

AND

 

9. LIMITATION AND EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY

 

9.1 Except where apply (1) any compulsory obligation or (2) any increased cap offered by the Service Provider as published on the website of the Service Provider or (3) any "Extended Cover" purchased by the Customer and based on declared value of goods as specified in the Service Provider website at dpd.com and subject to Sections 5.2, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 13 hereof and the other provisions of this Section 9, the Service Provider's liability for the loss of or damage to any goods and/or for any other matter (howsoever arising) under a Contract shall be limited to the lesser of the repair or replacement cost of lost or damaged goods (the Customer shall provide proof of value of goods lost or damaged) and;

 

a) if transportation by road, the liability cap set out as a minimum in the provisions of the CMR.

 

Subsequently, they states today the CMR is the value they have offered today at a rate of £8.78.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I've pasted the paragraphs I believe show dpd to be liable for loss/damage to the declaration value.

 

8. LIABILITY FOR LOSS AND DAMAGE AND DELAY

 

8.1 Subject to the provisions of this Section 8 and Sections 5.3, 9, 10 and 11, the Service Provider shall be liable for any physical loss of, or physical damage to, goods during Transit (as defined in Section 6), and storage, except as described in the specific provisions published on the website of the Service Provider at .dpd.com and except to the extent that such loss or damage has arisen from or consists of ???what?? something missing

 

AND

 

9. LIMITATION AND EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY

 

9.1 Except where apply (1) ???? any compulsory obligation or (2) any increased cap offered by the Service Provider as published on the website of the Service Provider or (3) any "Extended Cover" purchased by the Customer and based on declared value of goods as specified in the Service Provider website at dpd.com and subject to Sections 5.2, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 13 hereof and the other provisions of this Section 9, the Service Provider's liability for the loss of or damage to any goods and/or for any other matter (howsoever arising) under a Contract shall be limited to the lesser of the repair or replacement cost of lost or damaged goods (the Customer shall provide proof of value of goods lost or damaged) and;

 

a) if transportation by road, the liability cap set out as a minimum in the provisions of the CMR. What is this??

 

Subsequently, they states today the CMR is the value they have offered today at a rate of £8.78.

 

well you have probably looked at this more closely and more frequently than I have but at the moment I don't really understand much of it at all – apart from the puzzles which I have emphasised in red

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply.

 

It took DPD nearly 3 weeks to tell me the CMR rate, even they didn't know without full research. I still don't know what it stands for in all honesty! But they claim it's a standard rate that fluctuates daily.

 

There are further addtions to each block of text, I thought best not to copy the entire section as they're not applicable to my case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It took DPD nearly 3 weeks to tell me the CMR rate, even they didn't know without full research. I still don't know what it stands for in all honesty!

 

This may help to explain CMR, what it is, and compensation rates: https://bifa.org/library/freight-business/commercial/legal-issues/the-cmr-convention

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DPD will have a rough idea where your item went missing due to there tracking of that item.

 

Something you could consider asking them is was your item when it was lost in the possession of an Owner Driver(ODF).

 

Look at this link: https://drivers.dpd.co.uk/

 

Go down the webpage to 'Read all about becoming an Owner Driver Franchise', then Click on it. (please bear in mind this automatically downloads a PDF before downloading)

 

Open that PDF and have a good read, especially from page 4 onward as an example 'As an ODF you'll be your own Boss'

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

This may help to explain CMR, what it is, and compensation rates: https://bifa.org/library/freight-business/commercial/legal-issues/the-cmr-convention

 

thank you. This is very helpful.

 

So finally at post 12 we start to get an idea of what the situation is about.

 

The claim value of the OP is based on this: –

 

Compensation

This is calculated in relation to the value of the goods at the time and place at which they were accepted for carriage, and the value is based either on the commodity or market price, or, where there is no such price, the normal value of similar goods. Most Western European states have ratified a protocol to the CMR introducing compensation limits based on 8.33 SDRs per kilo of gross weight of the goods lost or damaged. An explanation of SDR – Single Drawing Right can be found in the Resources section of the library In addition to compensation for loss or damage, the carriage charges, customs duties and other charges incurred in respect of the transit are refundable in full in the case of a total loss, or pro rata in the case of a partial loss. Where the exporter or importer proves loss suffered through delay, an amount not exceeding the carriage charges may be recovered.

 

Higher compensation is possible if the exporter makes a declaration of value, which must be shown on the consignment note, but in such cases the carrier is entitled to a higher freight rate. I f the goods are not delivered within 30 days of an agreed time-limit, or in any other case within 60 days, a claimant can treat the goods as lost and claim compensation. Although the time limits set out above apply both to claims made in contract or in tort (the process by which an individual who was not part of the contract but responsible for executing it could potentially be sued), the carrier will lose the benefit of the CMR defences and limits of liability if the loss is caused by wilful misconduct. In one case, an accident caused by a driver who had grossly exceeded EU drivers'' hours rule limits was held to be attributable to wilful misconduct.

… In particular the part which I have emphasised.

 

So I take it that DPD agreed to deliver an item for you. They lost it. You made a declaration of value of £2000 and DPD either opted or declined to charge a higher freight charge. Whatever the case, the value was clear and they had an opportunity to adjust their carriage fee.

 

Now DPD are declining to on of the declaration value and instead are offering some other value of about eight quid.

 

What I don't understand is – how do they calculate that value. Maybe you can help us with this but I would appreciate if you could get to the nugget of the issue

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you. This is very helpful.

 

So finally at post 12 we start to get an idea of what the situation is about.

 

The claim value of the OP is based on this: –

 

 

… In particular the part which I have emphasised.

 

So I take it that DPD agreed to deliver an item for you. They lost it. You made a declaration of value of £2000 and DPD either opted or declined to charge a higher freight charge. Whatever the case, the value was clear and they had an opportunity to adjust their carriage fee.

 

Now DPD are declining to on of the declaration value and instead are offering some other value of about eight quid.

 

What I don't understand is – how do they calculate that value. Maybe you can help us with this but I would appreciate if you could get to the nugget of the issue

 

 

Thank for your advice. I wonder how easy it will be to ascertain this information. Even dealing with DPD today has been a nightmare. I've been told they're still conducting the search and a claim will be processed once it's deemed to be lost.

 

It appears they clearly don't communicate!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Small update: my insurance won't pay out on the claim so I'm in a worse position than last week as now 100% responsible for reimbursing my customer £2500. I'm hoping to appeal still with DPD but still no further forward to understanding the t&cs and my rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link to the T&Cs but this takes me to the entire contract. It would be helpful if you could link to the particular passage in question or else copy it here

 

Where I suggest that you install your call recorder and start getting a bit of verifiable/confirmable information down and then we can go somewhere.

 

I don't understand why DPD apparently telling you that because of your business insurance it will be fine and then they limit their liability to 8 quid.

 

I suggest that you lay it all out to them in a formal letter and send it recorded delivery. While you are waiting for a response start recording calls to gather all the information you can.

 

After about 7 or 10 days we can see what you've got and we can decide where to go.

 

have you acted on any of the advice that I gave you in the post which I have quoted here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe you could post the letter up here when you have completed it – but before you send it.

 

It will help us to understand the full story and also maybe we can suggest any changes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last week I requested all the information to make a formal complaint. This took 4 working days to receive but have it all recorded. I also emailed my complaint email to them to which hasn't had an acknowledgement from anyone in DPD even though they have contacted me. Not quite sure where to go if they're not even responding. Any suggestions welcome :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last week I requested all the information to make a formal complaint. This took 4 working days to receive but have it all recorded. I also emailed my complaint email to them to which hasn't had an acknowledgement from anyone in DPD even though they have contacted me. Not quite sure where to go if they're not even responding. Any suggestions welcome :)

 

It was already suggested that you post up details of your drafts but you chose not to.

 

Unless more Information is forthcoming the experts will not be quite sure where to go either.

 

You got to give info to get advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was already suggested that you post up details of your drafts but you chose not to.

 

Unless more Information is forthcoming the experts will not be quite sure where to go either.

 

You got to give info to get advice.

 

Thank you, that's noted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm unable to attached the letter as a document so will paste below will personal details removed. I have also requested search information from the depot and have their reply recorded as previously suggested.

 

To whom it may concern,

 

In relation to the phonecall from xxxx at xxxx depot I’m extremely dissatisfied with the offer that has been given for claim xxxx. I believe £8.78 is an insufficient sum to compensate the loss incurred. The item’s value was declared at £1500 which once my customers full total expenditure has been calculated sums to £2479.

 

Further to your terms and conditions for DPD classic as found below;

 

8. LIABILITY FOR LOSS AND DAMAGE AND DELAY

8.1 Subject to the provisions of this Section 8 and Sections 5.3, 9, 10 and 11, the Service Provider shall be liable for any physical loss of, or physical damage to, goods during Transit (as defined in Section 6), and storage, except as described in the specific provisions published on the website of the Service Provider at http://www.dpd.com and except to the extent that such loss or damage has arisen from or consists of.

 

9.1 Except where apply (1) any compulsory obligation or (2) any increased cap offered by the Service Provider as published on the website of the Service Provider or (3) any "Extended Cover" purchased by the Customer and based on declared value of goods as specified in the Service Provider website at http://www.dpd.com, and subject to Sections 5.2, 8, 9, 11, 12 and 13 hereof and the other provisions of this Section 9, the Service Provider's liability for the loss of or damage to any goods and/or for any other matter (howsoever arising) under a Contract shall be limited to the lesser of the repair or replacement cost of lost or damaged goods (the Customer shall provide proof of value of goods lost or damaged) and;

a) if transportation by road, the liability cap set out as a minimum in the provisions of the CMR.

 

 

Nowhere within this document does it state a compensatory sum of £8.78.

 

In addition to this information I requested a detailed explanation Monday 22nd January with evidence on how a search has been conducted and investigated regarding this matter; which took 4 working days to produce due to the manager being ‘too busy’. I wholly believe this matter in particular has not been taken seriously nor do I believe a thorough and concise search has been completed.

 

I would also like an answer to the comment made by your representative within the xxxx depot on the item possibly being stolen whilst it was within your care.

 

Why do you think it was stolen? Is there CCTV at the depot(s)? Has the driver been contacted to determine the whereabouts of my parcel?

 

How has this comment/action been investigated and whether such matter has been reported to the police (if not, why?).

 

I feel completely exasperated in the way this has been dealt with and handled. I as a small business owner spend xxxx on average annually for the courier services required and myself and my customers are dependent on the services provided and the loss of confidence in your service is too severe. My business is growing and the annual expenditure towards DPD will likely grow and if this matter isn’t dealt with in a swift and correct manner I will absolutely take my business elsewhere.

 

If I don’t have sufficient answers to all of the above and/or a resolution to this matter within 14 days I will end my contract with DPD and persue legal actions.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello, just wanted to ask if you had any results with your claim as i have a similar situation. DPD lost one of my parcels and the items value is about 1500.00 and they offer back only about 100. So i wonder if it is worth going through claims or to go to Small Claims court directly. Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, just wanted to ask if you had any results with your claim as i have a similar situation. DPD lost one of my parcels and the items value is about 1500.00 and they offer back only about 100. So i wonder if it is worth going through claims or to go to Small Claims court directly. Thank you

 

Please start a new thread for this and tell us the whole story. Then maybe we can advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, just wanted to ask if you had any results with your claim as i have a similar situation. DPD lost one of my parcels and the items value is about 1500.00 and they offer back only about 100. So i wonder if it is worth going through claims or to go to Small Claims court directly. Thank you

 

I had no further success via DPD with this claim. I did every the previous posters suggested but didn't have any further feedback and the claim was closed. It sounds like your parcel had the value declared but not properly insured so the £100 rate would be offered for air mail as a standard. Best of luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...