Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Kirklees council PCN - Code 86 Not parked correctly within the markin - any point challenging this parking ticket?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2210 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

This morning I had a very important meeting that I could not miss and went to park in my usual car park.

 

Unfortunately it was full, this has never been the case before, but I sucked it up and used the larger car park across the road where the minimum stay is 4 hours and they charge £2.50, this is why I never use it.

 

This car park is never more than half full, but was full today.

Obviously something local was going on as this has never happened in all the years I have been parking.

 

After driving around for 10 minutes and no space appearing I saw a space that was not blocking anyone at all, and it looked like a space.

There was a small triangle of yellow lines right in the corner of the space,

that made it look like you could maybe not park there,

but I checked all around and it was blocking no one at all, there was ample room.

I took the chance as I really could not miss this meeting and paid my ticket.

 

When I came back I had a ticket on the car,

this small triangle in the corner was half obscured by leaves and was not the easiest to see.

 

I took a pic of the leaves covering it down the side and at the back,

I also took a pic of the front of the car as it really did look like a parking space with white lines at the front and to show it was not blocking anything.

It was just this small half obscured yellow triangle at the back that made me doubtful, but that made no sense as it blocked nothing.

 

I am not trying to say I am in the right as I thought it maybe a non parking spot,

but paid my money and had no choice but to take my chance,

missing the meeting would have cost me far more than the ticket.

 

Is there any point trying to challenge this ticket or do I just suck it up and take it,

the least they could do is take the £2.50 off is the ticket was invalid.

 

Thanks for any help

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

council PENALTY CHARGE NOTICE

or private FAKE notice

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who knows? It is impossible to say from the (minimal) details you have provided.

As an example of significant information that you haven't provided, that will influence the reply you need:

Was this a council car park, or private parking company?.

Was the "ticket" you received a "parking charge notice" or "penalty charge notice"?

 

In the meantime, don't identify yourself as the driver if you have any contact with the issuer (& ideally, hold fire, and avoid any contact in the short term until you've had advice ....)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure it was council parking - Penalty charge notice.

 

Code 86 Not parked correctly within the markings of a bay or space.

 

The parking space was easily enough room to fit a car, in the back corner of the space there was a triangle of yellow lines crossed around 3 ft long and 1 ft high, thats all I can say really, the triangle covered about a quater of the whole space.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it says EXACTLY penalty charge notice?

Be sure its very important!!

 

PPC's are know to use codes too on their tickets to try and con people

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry , yes it is definitely council, I was always sure that car park was, issued by Kirklees council, if it was private it would have been in the bin.

 

As I say I am just wondering of there is any point challenging it or will it just get thrown out.

 

My points are, it looked like a parking bay, obstructed nothing at all and I paid for my ticket? Or I took pics and so much of the small yellow lined area was covered with leaves, could I go for the, it was covered and I did not notice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so,

I guess there argument was the yellow lines,

although these only covered around a 3rd of the parking space, not all of it.

 

I honestly have no idea why they were there as it just looked like a normal space and was blocking nothing off at all,

no entry or exit,

not stopping or impeding anyone getting in our out,

it wasn't obstructing anything.

 

This is why I took my chance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any chance you can show us a pic of the signage at the car park? and where you were parked?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no pics of signage

 

I have also tried to upload the pics via a image hosting site and they are just coming up as question marks which is odd, any other way I can share them?

 

Edit: Here are the links to the pics

 

https://ibb.co/dOEf6m

 

https://ibb.co/kyp8sR

 

https://ibb.co/nRoJsR

Link to post
Share on other sites

put the pictures in a word document one to a page

file save as PDF

upload it

 

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

 

I came on here about the original fine to see if I could appeal it.

I decided it was not worth it and paid the early £25 within 14 days.

This notice was served on 13th February.

 

Without looking I don't know if I have the receipt, I doubt it but if I dig deep enough I may, but I definitely paid it early (it was paid at my local post office) not sure if they will have it on record.

 

Today I have a letter that says I owe another £50 and it actually states, original about £50, 50% charge certificate and amount paid so far £25, so it admits I did pay £25.

 

I am utterly baffled why I have this letter, I made sure I paid within the 14 days, they have the payment showing as paid.

 

Am I missing something here?

 

What is the best stage of action to take?

 

Thanks for any help

 

Paul

Edited by dx100uk
spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

So this is a local authority parking fine? Do they have a help number to call?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes local authority, I have just emailed them, as phone line is always busy. Just wondering where Is stood as I can't find a receipt, maybe better to come back after they reply, just seems v odd and I really can't afford another fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have merged the threads so that people can see the history of the ticket :thumb:

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you pay the discounted penalty?

 

I Paid it 11 days after the letter arrived on the 13th February, so 11 days after that. I can only think they are saying its from when they sent the letter out and I missed the deadline, but not sure as it says nothing . I 100% paid 11 days after the letter arrived. I have had no answer to my email so need to ring them, just feel totally ripped off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original pcn was on the 15th january, so I'm assuming the letter of 13th February was a Notice to Owner, by which point you have lost the discount option (unless the NtO says different) and the full penalty of £50 is due. Since you only paid half the due amount, they are entitled to isssue the Charge Certificate with a 50% surcharge, ie £75. So minus the £25 paid , you still owe £50

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...