Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
    • I would say You should accept it - I HIGHLY doubt you will  be able to claim for letters at trial ans they’re offering you that, which is higher monetary value than interest.   Also they raise a good point, getting interest at anything above 4% is lucky these days, yes judges give it, but rarily above 4%   Also you might find depending on the judge  you don’t get some costs if you take it all the way over £7.40 when court woukdnt award letters costs and thus meaning their award would be less than evris offer which was made    Up to you though but the wait will be 3-4mo for a trial date at least
    • Hi Folks, Been 162 days! Just by way of update. Today I received a text from Opos Ltd so no doubt Capquest are renting the debt out to anybody who fancies a nibble. Safe to say I will not be responding.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/Cohen Claimform - Ex Barclaycard mediation planned - what to expect please help!


Josh2017
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2288 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have a mediation planned with regard to a small claim issued against me by Howard Cohen solicitors on behalf of hoist portfolio that I have a few questions about that I would like help on please.

 

A bit of back ground information..

 

The debt for £2900 was originally passed to MDKP LLP in November 2014, the account was then assigned by MKDP LLP to their client Hoist Portfolio in December 2015.

 

I had a payment plan set in place of £50 per month and made payments reducing the total outstanding to £2000,

in around June of this month i fell in to difficulty and missed a couple of payments,

 

I called and explained and was asked to provide an income and expenditure to show what i could afford and was told they would send me the appropriate paperwork for me to fill in.

 

Approx 2 weeks later I received a small claims pack requesting the sum of £2000 + costs so roughly £2200,

I called Hoist Portfolio and explained I was waiting for an income and expenditure pack and was told by a rather snotty woman

"its too late now, we will not accept any payments on this account no matter what you send in to us,

we have forwarded this now to our legal department and we are taking action against you"

 

I was then told it would be easier in the long run if i accepted the action and waited to see what the judge asked me to pay,

I thanked her kindly for her useless information and hung up!

 

I followed directions that have been posted on here and clicked defend all and sent the pack back,

but first i sent a CCA request and a cpr 31.14 both went unanswered,

I then submitted my defence on the last day i was allowed and its posted here.

 

Particulars of Claim.

 

1.This claim is for the sum of £2000 in respect of monies owing under an Agreement with the account number xxxxxxxxxx pursuant to The consumer credit Act 1974

(CCA). The debt was legally assigned by MKDP LLP (Ex Barclaycard) to the Claimant and notice has been served

 

2.The Defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the Agreement.

A default notice has been served upon the defendant pursuant to s.87(1) CCA.

 

3.The Claimant claims

1.The sum of £2000

2.costs

 

1 The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is accepted. In that I have had financial dealings with Barclaycard in the past. I do not recall with any precision the agreement the claimant refers to and have therefore sought clarity by way of a CPR 31.14 and CCA section 78 Request

 

3. Paragraph 2 is noted but again I have no recollection of the agreement or whether a Default Notice was ever served.The claimant is therefore put to strict proof to disclose the default notice its claim relies upon.

 

4. On receipt of the claim form, the Defendant sent a request under the customer credit Act 1974, by way of a section 78 for a copy of the agreement, and on payment of the statutory fee of £1.00; the Claimant did not respond and is and remains in Default of said s78 request. A further request was made via CPR 31.14,*

requesting disclosure of documents on which the Claimant is basing their claim. The claimant has failed to respond and to comply.

 

5. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and;

b) show and evidence the nature of any breach and Default Notice;

c) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for and;

d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim.

 

6. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of section 136 of the Law of Property Act and section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974.

 

8. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

 

When I submitted i ticked the mediation box,

I was surprised to receive a response back that the claimant also ticked the mediation box

and i now have a meeting planned next week for a one hour time slot on the phone.

 

Since setting up the mediation I have received a pack from howard cohen with some old card statements showing the balance at £2900 from barclaycard until MKDP took over the debt, a reconstituted credit agreement with no signature of mine on or anyones for that matter, a couple of default notices and a notice of assignment.

 

Now what I find strange is the very footnote of the letter i received states the client will consider allowing me to repay the debt by installments for the outstanding balance on sight of my income and expenditure details and payment offer and states an arrangement can be formalized at the above mentioned mediation.

 

I just dont get why they would not entertain my offer before yet once i click defend they now add this footnote or is this a standard comment that they put knowing full well unless i pay the full amount upon mediation they will pursue me through the small claims court?

 

When I spoke with the lady who set up the mediation appointment she implied most cases dont end up being settled with the full balance being paid and kind of pointed me towards offering less than the £2000 they are asking for, not sure why she did this tbh.

 

My questions are,

 

1.are they nervous because they have no proof they own the debt?

2. what kind of payment plan should I offer initially expecting to have to go up a bit to where they want to meet me?

 

3.lastly realistically what are my chances of getting something set up without having to go to court and get a CCJ using the mediation process?

 

Thank you and sorry for the essay just thought it would be easier if i added all information i held.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please complete this:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?428590-You-have-received-a-Claim-**ISSUED-IN-SCOTLAND**-What-you-need-to-do.

 

and scan up their paperwork bundle to ONE multipage PDF please

read upload.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that was quick for them to start legals.

why didn't you post up here, hindsight.

it doesn't seem to be barred, so it may rest on the enforceability of the agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ford, thanks for your response.

 

I had already had expert advice from several guys on here before mainly dx100uk and andyorch and probably cockily thought I could just do it myself this time,

 

the first time I had to go through this there was a bit more of a defence than this time so thought it would be easier to deal with

 

I kind of hoped they wouldnt reply to my defence and it would get stayed and i could set up a payment plan, I called their bluff and they called it would seem.

 

what other details is it worth posting?

 

Hi dx100uk thanks for commenting,

most of their paperwork is just old bank statements from Barclaycard,

 

I have 2 default notices, covering letter, reconstituted credit agreement and a couple of pages from the original letters regarding the claim,

 

I will do my best to get a to a scanner tomorrow to upload as i currently dont have access, unless their is anything you would like me to type up now,

 

im bored wife is asleep kids are playing xbox so im happy to type :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

get that link done please

the age of this and the other Q's could be the important bit toward correct info

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please complete this:

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?428590-You-have-received-a-Claim-**ISSUED-IN-SCOTLAND**-What-you-need-to-do.

 

and scan up their paperwork bundle to ONE multipage PDF please

read upload.

 

hi DX that link is for a claim issued in Scotland, Im not in Scotland. I cant se any questions to ask on that link I presume its the upload details and how to do it that im taking from that link?

Link to post
Share on other sites

doh! silly me

yess please

 

thanks ford.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is it the 620000 t&c's etc

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Hoist Portfolio Holdings 2 ltd, r/o first floor, le masurier house, st helier, jersey, je2

 

Date of issue – 28 sep 2017

 

What is the claim for –

1.This claim is for the sum of £2000 in respect of monies owing under an agreement with the account number xxx persuant to the consumer credit act 1974 cca

the debt was legally assigned by MKDP LLP ex barclaycard to the claimant and notice has been served.

 

2.The defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the agreement. A default notice has been served upon the defendant persuant to s.87(1)cca

3.the claimant claims.

1. the sum of £2000

2. costs

 

What is the value of the claim? £2300

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 2001

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? yes

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? NO

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? NO

 

Why did you cease payments? illness - more important bills

 

What was the date of your last payment?

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan icon? NO

 

Something I would like to add,

i assumed as the covering letter states i had been provided with a default notice in the pack from howard cohens that it would actually be there,

 

 

upon further inspection it is 3 sheets of

 

 

"what to do if i get a default notice"

and not an actual default notice,

 

 

i have checked the whole pack its definitely not there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you take the card out please?

when did you cease payments please?

 

not sure where we've ever told you to ring fleecing DCA's!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

card was taken out in 2001,

payments stopped in June 2017.

 

Only called the idiots to let them know i couldnt make a payment as i didnt want them harrassing me

thats when they told me they would send out an income and expenditure,

next call was to ask why they are lying when i received the claim pack

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you don't.....

that's why they do those things on purpose to make you react

never ever ring a DCA or their dogs!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a recon agreement is no good for a 2001 agreement

must be the signed one.

you tell the mediator you have not received the required response to enter into mediation...

 

can you not take photos ...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sure i can i was being thick,

what do you want to see their cover letter,

the recon agreement

(tbh not sure how this would hold up as its a rubbish copy they have sent me) and the notice of assignment, apart from the claim pack this is all i have from them

 

Not sure of the relevance of this,

regarding the card statements they have supplied me from Barclaycard

 

they have supplied them to me since mid 2011,

this is where i initially came into difficulty,

I quickly went over my allowed limit and have statements showing £500 worth of charges for late payments at £12 a time,

on default sum balance and returned direct debit fees of £12 a time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean by claim pack?

its not a WS

its just a reply to your CPR or CPR I assume.

 

agreement/defaults/T&C's

 

don't need cover letters nor statements

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean the claim pack that was sent to me by the courts,

apart from this and the envelope i received this week from the "solicitors"

 

I have very little information,

 

I will get onto it now and upload in a couple of mins

 

Do I phone mediation before they contact me next week and inform them that under CCA 1974; sec 127 (3) the original credit agreement is needed and It has not been provided,

 

will this eradicate the mediation or allow them more time to provide it if they can before we enter mediation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the info was from cohems I assume its in reply to the CPR

so the claimant has failed to comply with your CCA request that's fatal...

 

lets see the return 1st please

but it cant be a recon and I bet its the std 620000 crap they get out from their filing cabinet for every BC claimform they've replied on here

there are numerous hoist/hph2 ex Barclays claimform threads here already with uploads for you to look at.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you, yes its wifes name. But i am dealing with this for her, there is also some codes on the bottom of the t`s and c`s that i guess could be tied up with a printer as it has a date stamp on, only just noticed

 

Im impressed you seen that name though thats tiny

Link to post
Share on other sites

one point you've missed

I said twice abut the 620000 number...

and how they use those and remarkably get the right details typed in

when we know they put those up in every defended claim

 

go look at the upload on any other hoist/hph2 ex BC claimform thread

you'll see exactly the same docs

they are faking the same type set and getting them out of their filing cabinet

NOT from Barclaycard..fake documents.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...