Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hoist/Cohen Claimform - Ex Barclaycard mediation planned - what to expect please help!


Josh2017
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2292 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

simply because debt collection and debt buying is the biggest monetary sector of the whole finance industry.

 

some 750'000 speculative claimforms are issued every year...

 

85% go uncontested resulting in a default rubbestamped judgement whereby no human checks anything.

 

its a numbers game.

 

if everyone [YES YOU TOO!!] stopped blindly paying DCA's tomorrow

the whole industry would totally collapse over night.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea why you think that you would gain any advantage from going to mediation.

 

Have you not read any of the things that we have said here in the past about mediation – about how unsuitable it is?

 

Have you not even looked at the official advice relating to mediation - https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Guidance/civil_court_mediation_service_manual_v3_mar09.pdf ? Even this official guide at page 9 makes it clear that mediation is probably not suited to cases involving simple debt.

 

Have you done any reading or any preparation?

 

I would suggest that you cancel the mediation. Contact the mediation service in writing and also the claimant in writing – you may as well just copy them in – and make it clear that you are not prepared to enter into any mediation unless they provide you with a proper copy of the CCA – as outlined by site team member DX above. Tell them very clearly that in the meantime you deny that you are indebted to them as they allege and this will continue to be your position until they can prove evidence of the debt by providing a signed CCA.

 

If there is no CCA – then there is no enforceability – and there is absolute nothing to be gained by you from mediation. Of course the other side have a huge amount to gain from a mediation on this unenforceable debt because they will attempt to get you to agree and to sign up to some kind of scheme of repayment.

 

Cancel the mediation in writing and explain why and tell them that once you receive the CCA then you will have a look at your options. In the meantime you consider that the debt is unenforceable and you are ceasing all payments.

 

Send them a statutory request for a CCA – I think it costs £1.

 

I also suggest that you write to them formally and send them an amended defence.

 

 

The defence should be set out with the header that you used in the one that you have already supplied. It should simply headed "amended defence"

 

And it should say:

 

The defendant denies that he is indebted as alleged by the claimant or at all.

 

The claimant has failed to provide a signed copy of the Consumer Credit Act agreement.

 

Statement of truth

 

Signed, dated

this is what you should have supplied in the first place and saved everybody a load of problems.

 

 

Incidentally, I see that you have been on the phone to them. Presumably you haven't recorded your calls?

 

Also, a word on the defence that you have supplied. It is verbose and immediately flags up to the other side that you have no idea what you're talking about and you are easy prey. This is probably one of the reasons why they jumped at the chance of getting you into a mediation.

 

Apart from anything else, your frequent use of the phrase (or thereabouts) "I do not recall…" Is completely unsuitable for a solid defence. It demonstrates that you are in doubt as to what you say and if it ever came before a judge, this very clear doubt that you have admitted to having will form the basis of a judgement against you.

 

I'm sorry to say that not only is the defence verbose but it is also an attempt to be formal and to adopt what you imagine is the legal vernacular. In fact this is the kind of language that I see used by student solicitors who are still doing their legal practice courses and still walk around as if they have a stick up their derriere.

 

In future, please come here before you start getting involved in any of this kind of thing. You will save yourself a lot of trouble – and also us as there will be fewer problems for us to sort out for you.

 

Geddit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just noticed the address on the t`s and c`s was not the correct address at time of execution of the credit agreement

 

good spot too.

 

just cancel mediation Monday

 

the defence is one of andyorch std ones and if fine for the old mkdp ex BC claimforms.

 

don't also forget hph2 [the hoist group] purchased mkdp group in 2013

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bankfodder,

 

Thank you very much for your input and information I take on board what you say and yes with hindsight I should have played things out differently and came to you guys first.

 

The reason why I ticked yes to mediation was down to the fact last time this happened to me I was told to agree to mediation from a member of this site so assumed this was standard delay tactics.

 

The telephone calls I had with the claimant were not recorded although should I ever have to contact them again sure I will record for future reference.

 

With regard to the defence, This defence I used was copied from a claim I had previously been involved with that never made it to court, the claim was put together for me by a team member so I simply amended it and cut out the parts that had no relevance to this claim assuming what was good for one would be good for another similar case.

 

I have done lots of reading regarding mediation, claims and similar cases but none of what I read made me think I had to handle this claim differently to what I had been recommended to do previously,

 

In future I will leave this to the experts who deal with it daily, thank you for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help DX you had a late night mainly down to me and it was appreciated, did you manage to remove the sensitive info that i left on the pdf`s by mistake or would you like me to re submit them with it blacked out?

 

The defence was one i copied from Andy that gave me the outcome I wanted the last time I was involved in a claim.

 

Bankfodder / dx

 

Just to clarify my next steps:

 

Send a cancellation request off to mediation / Claimant Monday stating the reason:

 

"I am not prepared to enter into any mediation unless the claimant can provide me with a proper copy of the original signed CCA and I deny that I am indebted to the claimant as alleged and this will continue to be my position until the claimant can prove evidence of the debt by providing a signed CCA.

Once I receive the CCA I will look at my options, In the meantime I consider that the debt is unenforceable and I am ceasing all payments"

 

I will enclose a £1 payment within the claimants envelope and request a statutory request for a CCA for the alleged debt.

 

Do I need to make reference to the year the agreement was allegedly made (2000) stating a reconstituted agreement is not sufficient as a CCA?

 

With regard to the amended defence I will use the following defence added by bankfodder:

 

Amended Defence

 

The defendant denies that he is indebted as alleged by the claimant or at all

 

The claimant has failed to provide a signed copy of the consumer credit act agreement

 

statement of truth

 

with signature and date.

 

I will send this off to the claimant solicitors, do I need to send this off to the courts too? I have already submitted my defence deveral weeks ago.

 

If the claimant is unable to provide a copy of the original agreement what is likely to happen?

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll be doing the docs today

its not an issue anyway as those that need to see them can anyway.

 

I wouldn't bother amending your defence ...

costs too much and changes little

 

just send our std CCA request to the claimant today.

 

sorry you've already sent a CCA request once you got the claimform

theres no need for a second one.

 

I would simply ring mediation Monday and cancel

nothing more needed

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It will cost you £255 to submit an amended defence and possible costs from the claimant..it must be done by way of n244 application notice and you will also have to seek the claimants permission.

 

The defence you have submitted is tried and tested with 1000s of discontinued claims in the Financial Legal Success forum.

 

Mediation will cancel anyway...once you inform them they are still in default of your section 78 request.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

ofcourse I meant wouldn't bother...:lol:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to eventually run away

go read the like claims here already.

 

on a recon agreement and the fake 620000 T&C's they usually do.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys for your help,

 

What am I hoping will be the next stage by the claimant after mediation is cancelled?

 

It proceeds .......you refer to your Notice of allocation and comply with the directions....submission of a witness statement and standard disclosure in preparation for the hearing date.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...