Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Virgin Media - Trespass?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2159 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After receiving a Wayleave letter from Virgin Media out of the blue and neighbours not having the decency to discuss with me first, I denied access and did not sign the Wayleave.

 

I just returned home to find one of their contracted engineers on my property, who had lifted drain covers and laid cables in the drain along the length of my property.

 

I'm really annoyed that they would just walk onto my property and install cables without permission. What are my options please? Any advice welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

They asked me to sign an access agreement which I did not sign. I emailed them the following.

 

"With regard to your recent letter…undated. As owner of this property, I do not wish to have cables or ducting running over or under my property and will not grant permission for such an undertaking.

 

Please do not contact me further regarding this matter"

 

In essence they needed permission to be on my property which I denied.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That doesn't answer the question.

 

But I sounds like its not a stat wayleave.

 

Write to them, not email, registered saying they have 14 days to remove the cable or you will commence legal proceedings. Put a big red title at the top.. Letter before action.

 

 

However I do advise for you not to remove or dig up the cable yourself or "accidentally" cut it with a spade. This could lead to a prosecution

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can ask them to compensate you for the trespass and to remove the offending cabling. You can issue a court claim to achieve this if they refuse.

 

What I’m unsure of is if you are entitled to “self-help” and if you can just remove the cabling yourself (making it clear they can come and collect their cable).

It wouldn’t be theft if you weren’t intending to keep the cable, but you might want to be sure it isn’t criminal damage to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you specifically deny access on the form & return, or just did not return the form?

 

I did not return the form as it was an online signature required, which I obviously did not sign. The email to them was just out of courtesy and they replied asking which house the installation was at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will a court enforce the trespass and give damages rather than mandate the removal of the cabling?

Is there applicable judicial guidance claimants can respectfully draw to the court’s attention or is it the “judicial lottery” (dependant on the judge, on the day)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the property might be yours but the underground drain is not esp if it serves other properties

the water company would have given perm for them to lay their cables in them ?

so don't go removing them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

really, that's a bit silly of them then.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow the advice above. Only sent the letter advised if you are fully willing to go through full court action. They recieve hundreds of threats of legal action, very few ever go to court, so they will call your bluff.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the basis of what you say, you have an excellent chance of success.

 

Is the trespass merely that they came onto your property to let the cable – or is the cable itself trespassing on your property as well?

 

If the cable itself is trespassing then that means that not only was there a trespass in order to install it but there is a continuing trespass and in terms of damages that becomes more interesting.

 

Trespass damages would be awarded under two heads. Firstly to compensate for any damage/losses. Secondly to remedy the insult of the trespass.

 

I haven't heard you talk about any damage so far so I would expect that this head of loss would be quite minimal. Maybe even a nominal £1. The second head of damage is far more interesting and you need to think carefully about what you are going to ask.

 

In any event, you shouldn't bring a legal action unless you know what it is you are asking for and you can justify it.

 

Maybe you can tell us a bit more about the trespass and maybe put up some pictures in PDF format please

Link to post
Share on other sites

cable is trespassing.

 

Your problem is that the judge may decide on a sum to compensate you for this and the cable stays.

 

You will have to consider what alternatives Virgin have in the routing of their cable.

 

If it is a straightforward digging up the pavement then yes, they will be expected to remove the offending wirework and place it where they have statutory permission.

 

If there is no real alternative then you will be given a cheque as quantum for the damages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread tidied

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

your pictures dont really show where the cable ends up and certainly give no indication of any alternative route. We take it as read that it is going from a public highway at the front of your property but where does it end up. Are those other houses behind yours that have access over the driveway for example.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No.3 shows where the cable begins from under next door's property. The trunking for that was installed many years before I moved into the property. It then goes along the drain over my driveway to the garden next door pic no.3. I'm not concerned about an alternative route as long as it isn't over my property. The tarmaced piece at the end of my patio and drive is communal and owned by all three houses, mine included.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing you need to decide here is what you want the end result to be, If it is complete removal of the cable from your property then think how that is going to impact on your neighbour

 

How well do you get on with your neighbour, If you get on with them and have a good relationship with them, That could all change once their services have been stopped because you objected to their service crossing your boundary

 

Years ago i had neighbours that we didn't get on with and its not pleasant, I really like having good neigbours that all get along now

 

If my neighbours needed a cable crossing under my property to get a service, I would do it without hesitation

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did get on with the them fine,

but the fact they didn't even ask if it was ok and discuss it with me says it all really.

 

why should I give a damn about what they want?

May sound a bit harsh..

.but I think it's downright rude what they have done.

 

I intend having the cable removed.

They had TV and telephone before this installation..

.it just wasn't with Virgin Media.

 

What riles me the most is some big corporate thinking they can just do what they want on a property they don't even own.

I own my home outright and worked hard to pay for it...Virgin Media didn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...