Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Southwest Water CCJ 2018


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2292 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can any Southwest Water customer legally be issued a debt demand and then be taken straight to Court for a CCJ with no defence ?

 

Southwest Water debt letters and their CCJs again, they seem to be the bane of people's lives.

 

Hi, to save starting a new thread I'll use this for Southwest Water "debt",

which looks to be a Southwest Water Christmas [problem] .

 

An elderly member of my family lives in a retirement complex,

and received a demand for a Southwest Water debt,

with a County Court claim (leading to a CCJ) just before Christmas 2017 (dirty trick really, there was no time to defend it).

 

She's usually very good but she's somehow upset these 'people'.

It seems she received a Southwest Water demand letter for over £200 which apparently was for the year.

 

I know she's always paid her bill at the Post Office,

so the SWW demand and the resultant CCJ are a mystery.

 

Today the Court letter came and she's now got a CCJ for six years;

obviously she admitted the "debt" either to save herself trouble or out of some sense of duty.

 

The same trick was played on a neighbour last year, just before Christmas.

 

My conclusion is to beware.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and good evening :)

 

Question, if I may:

 

can any Southwest Water customer legally be issued a debt demand, and then be taken straight to Court for a CCJ with no defence ?

 

Southwest Water debt letters and their CCJs again,

they seem to be the bane of people's lives.

I was advised that this website may be helpful,

 

so here goes...

 

I have what appears to be a Southwest Water Christmas job.

 

An elderly member of my family lives in a retirement complex,

and received a demand for a Southwest Water "debt" (>£200).

 

They also issued a county court claim (leading to a CCJ) just before Christmas 2017

(dirty trick really, there was no time to defend it within the fortnight).

 

She's usually very good but she's somehow upset these 'people'.

I know she's always paid her bill at the Post Office, so the SWW demand and the resultant CCJ are a mystery.

 

I'd call it a damn cheek.

If she'd been defaulting on a large sum for a long time, I would sort of understand it, but I'd expect South-west water to be regulated in these things.

 

Today the Court letter came and she's now got a CCJ for six years;

obviously she "admitted" the "debt" without telling us,

either to save herself trouble or out of some sense of duty.

 

The same thing happened to a neighbour just before Christmas last year.

 

My conclusion is to beware, and I'd be interested to hear if South-west Water broke any rules in this case or others.

I accept that the CCJ can't be undone now.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why cant it?

what address did they sent the claimform too?

she had 33 days not 14...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply @dx100uk.

 

Apparently the claim was sent direct to her and had to be answered within 14-16 days

(clearly stating "you only have a short time to answer this letter").

 

The Court letter arrived shortly before Christmas 2017 and the holidays.

 

Naturally she was frightened and just wanted it to go away;

she didn't even think of going to the CAB.

She's also paid the first instalment this evening.

If the CCJ could be set aside or SWW did not follow rules (for a defence before Court),

 

I'd be interested to know.

However I'm thinking that SWW have won here.

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you checked the bill is correct?

she had 19 days from the date on the claimform to ack it

then shed get a total of 33 days to file a defence

so looks like she missed the 19days?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date was on the claim form ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you checked the bill is correct?

she had 19 days from the date on the claimform to ack it

then shed get a total of 33 days to file a defence

so looks like she missed the 19days?

 

Thankyou for replying.

 

Goodness, I can't state the date here and now, and I don't live with her, I'm sorry.

 

Difficult to check her bill and she pays weekly,

I will be sorting through her bills and receipts.

 

As I said before: she did not miss the 19 days ; she completed the claim form and returned it within the 14-16 days stipulated on the form.

 

Remember she is elderly, and like some people she isn't up to speed with these things.

She would need advice and support like most vulnerable people.

Whichever way it's cut, Southwest Water tactics here are pretty shocking and morally questionable.

 

I'm alleging that Southwest Water have sent these Court letters just before Christmas, with scare tactics.

They've done this to others I know personally,

and in my experience over many years they've usually been unhelpful and inflexible.

Quick to go to Court too.

 

I might ring a lawyer but as I've said,

SWW seems to have won here with their cut and dried blanket policy.

 

In future she will better off paying in advance,

I will keep her receipt and and hopefully she'll escape SWW methods and penalties.

Thanks for your replies in any case.

Edited by gardenfrog
Link to post
Share on other sites

you are making to many assumptions and the things you are intimating are not correct .

 

so if she completed the claimform

which you have not said she did till now

 

what did she put down?

 

she must have admitted the debt to now have a CCJ with a payment order in return?

 

Blaming it to a sneaky SWW smacks of not understanding things properly

take the blinkers off please

there is no issue with claimform being issued 'at christmas'

theres no loss of time to respond, the courts are only closed for one day.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou.

 

I must assume you haven't read -

- and have no interest in-

- the question I posed at the beginning.

 

I also disagree with you.

 

Rather than engage in your partisan conversation and aggressive rudeness I'd sooner seek more qualified advice elsewhere.

 

Thankyou.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well answer the questions then.

you came here slagging off sww that they've pulled some trick to get a ccj as its the holidays.

theres no such trick..it makes no diff

 

so she sent back the form and admitted the debt ??

 

what date was the claimform?

did they abide by the new pre action protocol?

 

As I said before: she did not miss the 19 days ; she completed the claim form and returned it within the 14-16 days stipulated on the form.

 

WHERE: no you didn't..

to interested in slagging the system off

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread temporally closed.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2292 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...